The use of media sources increases exponentially during a health crisis or disaster. Similarly, digital health information and misinformation can spread quickly through social media. From the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the press conference has been one of the federal, state, and territory governments’ key outlets for providing updates, containing misinformation, reassuring constituents, and articulating public health measures. This article focuses on NSW press conferences relating to the major Delta outbreak in Australia. The article looks at the press conferences as they pertain to the NSW government's controversial targeting of the lower socioeconomic and ethnically diverse south-west ‘hotspot’ or ‘LGA of concern’, Fairfield, which turned the LGA into an area of intense policing. We argue strategic manoeuvring in the press conferences, through the individualisation of responsibility and blame shifting, formed part of the NSW government's attempts to minimise political fallout.
BaumFNewmanLBiedrzyckiK (2012) Vicious cycles: Digital technologies and determinants of health in Australia. Health Promotion International29(2): 349–360.
9.
BerkowitzRLGaoXMichaelsEK, et al. (2020) Structurally vulnerable neighbourhood environments and racial/ethnic COVID-19 inequities. Cities & Health: (ahead of print article) 1–4. DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1792069.
10.
BoinAHartPTMcConnellA, et al. (2010) Leadership style, crisis response and blame management: The case of hurrican katrina. Public Administration88(3): 706–723.
BotterillLCLakeJWalshMJ (2021) Factors affecting public responses to health messages during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: Partisanship, values, and source credibility. Australian Journal Of Political Science 56(4): 358-375.
CairneyPWellsteadA (2021) COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice4(1): 1–14.
15.
CardonaB (2021) The pitfalls of personalization rhetoric in time of health crisis: COVID-19 pandemic and cracks on neoliberal ideologies. Health Promotion International36(3): 714–721.
16.
CockburnP (2021) NSW Premier gladys berejiklian cancels daily COVID press conference as state sets new infection record. ABC News (accessed 10 September 2021).
17.
CroucherS MSommierMRahmaniD (2015) Intercultural communication: Where we’ve been, where we’re going, issues we face. Communication Research and Practice1(1): 71–87.
18.
Cuan-BaltazarJYMuñoz-PerezMJRobledo-VegaC, et al. (2020) Misinformation of COVID-19 on the internet: infodemiology study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance6(2): e18444.
19.
DavisA. (2018). Reckless Opportunists: Elites and at the End of the Establishment. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
DepouxAMartinSKarafillakisE, et al. (2020) The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine27(3): taaa031.
KentMEllisK (2015) People with disability and new disaster communications: access and the social media mash-up. Disability & Society,30(3): 419–431. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2015.1021756.
34.
KozinetsRVGershoffADWhiteTB (2020) Introduction to special issue: trust in doubt: consuming in a post-truth world. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research5(2): 130–136.
NSW Department of Health (2020a) COVID-19 Press conference with Chinese media Tuesday 3 march. Available at: https://vimeo.com/395134712/ac0d308e56 (accessed 4 November 2021).
NutbeamD (2000) Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International15(3): 259–267.
55.
O’MaraB (2012) Social media, digital video and health promotion in a culturally and linguistically diverse Australia. Health Promotion International28(3): 466–476.
PicklesKCvejicENickelB, et al. (2020) COVID-19: beliefs in misinformation in the Australian community. medRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.04.20168583.
59.
PienaarKFloreJPowerJ, et al. (2021) Making publics in a pandemic: posthuman relationalities, ‘viral’ intimacies and COVID-19. Health Sociology Review30(3): 244-259.
60.
RennOLevineD (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: KaspersonREStallenPJM (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, 175−217.
61.
ReynoldsBSeegerM (2005) Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication10(1): 43–55.
StobartADuckettS (2021) Australia’s response to COVID-19. Health Economics, Policy and Law 17(1): 95-106.
65.
SuZMcDonnellDAhmadJ, et al. (2020) Time to stop the use of ‘wuhan virus’, ‘China virus’ or ‘Chinese virus’ across the scientific community. BMJ Global Health5(9): e003746.
WatkinsDVClevengerAD (2021) US Political leadership and crisis communication during COVID-19. Cogent Social Sciences7(1): 1901365.
72.
WibawaT (2020) Push for multilingual COVID-19 resources to help elderly people who don't speak English. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-21/coronavirus-information-limited-language-cald-australia/12063104 (accessed 12 November 2020).
73.
Woodward-KronRStoryD (2020) Intercultural communication and safe, effective healthcare for all. Future Leaders Communiqué5(3): 11–13.
74.
XieBCharnessNFingermanK, et al. (2020) When going digital becomes a necessity: ensuring older Adults’ needs for information, services, and social inclusion during COVID-19. Journal of Aging & Social Policy32(4-5): 460−470.
