Introduction to algorithmic antagonisms: Resistance,reconfiguration,and renaissance for computational life

Amoore L (2020) Cloud ethics. Duke University Press.

Ananny M Crawford K (2018) Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media and Society.

Azar M Cox G Impett L (2021) Introduction: ways of machine seeing. AI and Society. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-01124-6.

Barnett JT Johnson CW (2014) Queer. In: S Thompson (ed) Encyclopedia of Diversity and Social Justice. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, p. 581.

boyd D (2008) Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. Berkeley: PhD.

boyd D (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. A networked self. Routledge, pp.47–66.

boyd D Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 662–679.

Castells M (2007) Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication 1(1): 29.

Chambers SA (2001) Language and politics: Agonistic discourse in the west wing. CTheory. 11/12/2001–2011/2012/2001.

Costa E (2018) Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society 20(10): 1461444818756290.

Costanza-Chock S (2020) Design Justice: Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds we Need. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Crawford K (2016) Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(1): 77–92. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915589635.

Cubitt S (2006) Tactical media.

Daso F (2021) DoNotPay, A Consumer Robotic Process Automation Startup, Encodes Consumer Rights Into Society’s Operating System. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickdaso/2021/10/31/donotpay-a-consumer-robotic-process-automation-startup-encodes-consumer-rights-into-societys-operating-system/ (accessed 14 December).

Davis JL (2020) How Artifacts Afford: The Power and Politics of Everyday Things. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Dencik L Hintz A Redden J , et al. (2019) Exploring data justice: Conceptions, applications and directions. Information, Communication & Society 22(7): 873–881.

DiSalvo C (2012) Adversarial Design. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Dourish P (2016) Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data and Society 3(2).

Elwes J (2016) Machine Learning Porn. Available. Available at: https://www.jakeelwes.com/project-MLPorn.html

Elwes J (2021) Making of The Zizi Show. https://youtu.be/3c5-ABUkI_M.

Forensic Architecture (2021) Environmental Racism in Death Alley, Louisiana.

Fuller M (ed.) (2008) Software studies: A lexicon. Mit Press.

Ganesh M I Moss E (2022) Resistance and refusal to algorithmic harms: Varieties of ‘knowledge projects'. Media International Australia 183(1): 90–106.

Garcia D Lovink G (1997) The ABC of tactical media. posting to Nettime mailing list 16.

Heemsbergen L (2019) Killing secrets from Panama to Paradise: Understanding the ICIJ through bifurcating communicative and political affordances. New Media and Society 21(3): 693–711.

Johnson J (2014) From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology 16(4): 263–274.

Kalpokas I (2019). Agency and the Posthuman Shape of Law. Algorithmic Governance. Cham.: Palgrave Pivot, 67–88.

Kapsch P H (2022) Exploring user agency and small acts of algorithm engagement in everyday media use. Media International Australia 183(1): 16–29.

Kitchin R (2017) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20(1): 14–29.

Kluitenberg E Garcia D (2017). The Concept of Tactical Media. In:Tactical Media Files. Available at: http://www.tacticalmediafiles.net/articles/44999 (accessed 20 April 2021).

Lavigne S (2021). Zoom Escaper. Available at: https://zoomescaper.com (accessed 24 February).

Magalhães J C (2022) Algorithmic resistance as political disengagement. Media International Australia 183(1): 77–89.

Milioni D L Papa V (2022) The oppositional affordances of data activism. Media International Australia 183(1): 44–59.

Mouffe C (2005) The Return of the Political. London: Verso.

Mueller G (2021) Breaking Things at Work: The Luddites Are Right About Why You Hate Your Job. Brooklyn: Verso.

Neff G Tanweer A Fiore-Gartland B , et al. (2017) Critique and contribute: A practice-based framework for improving critical data studies and data science. Big data 5(2): 85–97.

Noble SU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.

Nunez C (2017) Artificial intelligence and legal ethics: Whether AI lawyers can make ethical decisions. Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 20: 189.

Ochigame R (2020) Informatics of the Oppressed. Logic.

Ochigame R Ye K (2021) Search Atlas: Visualizing Divergent Search Results Across Geopolitical Borders. Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1970–1983.

Pasquale F (2015) The Black Box Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Pereira G et al. (2022) We've always been antagonistic: algorithmic resistances and dissidences beyond the Global North. Media International Australia 183(1):124–138.

Raley R (2009) Tactical Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Riehl D (2020) Copyrighting all the melodies to avoid accidental infringement. Tedx Minneapolis. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJtm0MoOgiU (accessed 20 April).

Seaver N (2017) Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data and Society 4(2).

Sholette G Ray G (2008) Reloading tactical media: An exchange with Geert Lovink. Third Text 22(5): 549–558.

Simshaw D (2018) Ethical issues in robo-lawyering: The need for guidance on developing and using artificial intelligence in the practice of law. Hastings LJ 70: 173.

Soon W Cox G (2021) Aesthetic Programming: A Handbook of Software Studies. London: Open Humanities Press.

Sued G E Castillo-González M C Pedraza C et al. (2022) Vernacular Visibility and Algorithmic Resistance in the Public Expression of Latin American Feminism. Media International Australia 183(1): 60–76.

Tan G (2021) Robo-Lawyer Valued at $210 Million With Backing From Andreessen. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-30/robo-lawyer-valued-at-210-million-with-backing-from-andreessen (accessed 14 December).

Taylor L (2017) What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data and Society 4(2).

Thomas SL Nafus D Sherman J (2018) Algorithms as fetish: Faith and possibility in algorithmic work. Big Data & Society 5(1). DOI: 10.1177/2053951717751552.

Treem JW Leonardi PM (2012) Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook 36: 143–189.

Treré E (2018) From digital activism to algorithmic resistance. In: G Meikle (ed) The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism. London: Routledge.

Velkova J Kaun A (2021) Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society 24(4): 523–540.

Weizman E (2017) Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Whitman A (1973) Earl Browder, Ex–Communist Leader, Dies at 82. New York Times, 28 June 1973.

Wiehn T (2022) Becoming intimate with algorithms: Towards a critical antagonism via algorithmic art. Media International Australia 183(1): 30–43.

Yu Z Treré E Bonini T (2022) The emergence of algorithmic solidarity: unveiling mutual aid practices and resistance among Chinese delivery workers. Media International Australia 183(1): 107–123.

Zuboff S (2019) The age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.