This article seeks to understand how Latin American feminist public expression has gained algorithm-mediated visibility on social media. To this end, a cross-platform analysis was conducted for two issues: the legalisation of abortion in Argentina and the struggle to eliminate violence against women. The data were collected on four platforms: Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube through the representative hashtags, ‘#abortolegal2020’, ‘#25N’, and ‘#niunamenos’. Digital critical methods were employed to gather data and approach high-visibility users, visual messages, and hashtagging practices. The findings reveal two configurations of algorithmic mediated visibility, formed by assemblages of actors, formats, and knowledge: platform vernaculars and algorithmic resistance. Both result in a mutual shaping between platforms, seeking to impose a quantitative logic of visibility, and feminist actors, using the tactics of algorithmic resistance to give visibility to the content, aesthetics, and resignified messages about their struggles.
OECDet al. (2020) Latin American Economic Outlook 2020: Digital Transformation for Building Back Better. Paris: OECD Publishing.
2.
AbidinC (2021) Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal12(1): 77–103.
3.
AllenNMagniGSearingD, et al. (2020) What is a career politician? Theories, concepts, and measures. European Political Science Review12(2): 199–217.
4.
Banet-WeiserS (2018) Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
Banet-WeiserSGillRRottenbergC (2020) Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah banet-weiser, rosalind gill and catherine rottenberg in conversation. Feminist Theory21(1), pp. 3–24.
6.
Bard-WigdorGArtazoG (2017) Pensamiento feminista Latinoamericano: Reflexiones sobre la colonialidad del saber/poder y la sexualidad [Latin American feminist thought: reflections on the coloniality of knowledge / power and sexuality]. Cultura y Representaciones Sociales11(22): 193–219. Available at http://www.culturayrs.unam.mx/index.php/CRS/article/view/301 (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
7.
BarrancosD (2020) Historia mínima de los feminismos en América Latina[A Minimal History of Feminisms in Latin America]. México: El Colegio de México.
8.
BertolacciniLM (2020) Pañuelos en el activismo callejero. Políticas de aparición y protestas sociales feministas [Scarves in street activism. Emergence policies and feminist social protests]. Polémicas Feministas (4): 1–14. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2133/20883 (accessed 13 June 2021).
9.
BishopSBradbury-RanceCConorB, et al. (2020) Introduction to the special issue: Algorithms for her? Feminist claims to technical language. Feminist Media Studies20(5): 730–732.
10.
Blanco-RamírezGScott-MetcalfeA (2017) Hashtivism as public discourse: Exploring online student activism in response to state violence and forced disappearances in Mexico. Research in Education97(1): 56–75.
11.
BrunsA (2008) The future Is user-led: The path towards widespread produsage. Fibreculture Journal (11), Available at: https://eleven.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-066-the-future-is-user-led-the-path-towards-widespread-produsage/ (accessed 10 June 2021).
12.
BucherT (2018) If … Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
BurgessJGreenJ (2018) YouTube Online Video and Participatory Culture. Second Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
CARE (2020) Rapid Gender Analysis for the Emergence of COVID-19 in LAC[Análisis Rápido de Género para la Emergencia de la COVID-19 en ALC]. Atlanta: CARE-UN Women.
Cerva-CernaD (2020) La protesta feminista en México. La misoginia en el discurso institucional y en las redes sociodigitales [The feminist protest in Mexico. Misogyny in institutional discourse and sociodigital networks]. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales65(240): 177.
17.
CeurvelsMWilliamsonD (2020) TikTok’s corporate focus on Latin America is paying off. Available at: https://www.emarketer.com/content/tiktoks-corporate-focus-on-latin-america-paying-off (accessed 10 June 2021).
CotterK (2019) Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on instagram. New Media & Society21(4), pp. 895–913.
20.
De la TorreRSemánP (2021) Religiones y espacios públicos en América Latina. [Religions and public spaces in Latin America]. Buenos Aires: Latin American Council of Social Sciences.
21.
DeuzeM (2003) The Web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of news media online. New Media & Society5(2): 203–230.
22.
DixonK (2014) Feminist online identity: Analyzing the presence of hashtag feminism. Journal of Arts and Humanities3(7): 34–40.
23.
ECLAC (2020) Adressing Violence Against Women and Girls and Girls During and After the COVID-19. Santiago: ECLAC.
24.
ElmerG (2015) Scraping the first person. In: LangloisGReddenJElmerG (eds) Compromised Data: From Social Media to Big Data. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 112–125.
25.
EsterBChaves-GarcíaN (2019) La cuestión del aborto en América Latina [The abortion issue in Latin America]. Available at: https://www.celag.org/la-cuestion-del-aborto-en-america-latina/ (accessed 10 June 2021).
26.
FelittiKRamírez-MoralesMdR (2020) Pañuelos verdes por el aborto legal: historia, significados y circulaciones en Argentina y México [Green scarves for legal abortion: history, meanings and circulations in Argentina and Mexico]. Encartes. Revista Digital Multimedia3(5), Available at: https://encartes.mx/felitti-ramirez-panuelos-verdes-aborto-argentina-mexico/ (accessed 10 June 2021).
27.
Flores-MárquezD (2019) Imaginar un mundo mejor: la expresión pública de los activistas en internet[Imagine a Better World: Public Expression of Activists on the Internet]. Guadalajara: ITESO.
28.
FrankzeABechmannAZimmerM, et al (2020) Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. Available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf. (accessed 10 June 2021).
29.
GEO (2019) Laws of violence. Gender Equality Observatory of Latin America and the Caribbean. Available at: https://oig.cepal.org/en/laws/violence-laws.
30.
GibbsMMeeseJArnoldM, et al. (2015) #Funeral and instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society18(3): 255–268.
31.
GillR (2007) Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies10(2): SAGE Publications Ltd: 147–166.
32.
GillR (2016) Post-postfeminism?: New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies16(4): 610–630.
33.
GillespieT (2014) The relevance of algorithms. In: GillespieTBoczkowskiPFootK (eds) Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 167–193.
34.
GuinaudeauB (2020) Benjaminguinaudeau/Tiktokr [software]. Available at: https://github.com/benjaminguinaudeau/tiktokr (accessed 10 June 2021).
35.
HighfieldTLeaverT (2016) Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice2(1): 47–62.
36.
Huguet-PanéG (2021) Por qué el morado es el color del feminismo [Why purple is the color of feminism]. Available at: https://historia.nationalgeographic.com.es/a/por-que-morado-es-color-feminismo_16449 (accessed 10 June 2021).
37.
HutchinsonJ (2021) Micro-platformization for digital activism on social media. Information, Communication & Society24(1): 35–51.
38.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture. New York: New York University Press.
LarsenF (2016) El aborto en América Latina: entre el derecho y el poder [Abortion in Latin America: between law and power]. In: VII Congreso de Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad de La Plata: Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, 24-26 November 2016. Available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/58254 (accessed 10 June 2021).
LeaverTHighfieldTAbidinC (2020) Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
43.
LievrouwL (2011) Alternative and Activist New Media. Cambridge: Polity.
44.
MaratE (2021) Transformative Violence and Mobilization in India and Mexico. Mobilization: An International Quarterly26(3): 303–322.
45.
MarresNGerlitzC (2016) Interface methods: Renegotiating relations between digital social research, STS and sociology. The Sociological Review64(1): 21–46.
46.
MarresNWeltevredeE (2013) Scraping the social? Issues in live social research. Journal of Cultural Economy6(3): 313–335.
47.
MarwickA (2017) Microcelebrity, self-branding, and the internet. In: RitzerG (ed) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–3.
48.
McDuffieKAmesM (2021) Archiving affect and activism: Hashtag feminism and structures of feeling in women’s march tweets. First Monday26(2).
49.
MilanS (2015) When algorithms shape collective action: Social Media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media + Society1(2). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305115622481
50.
MilanS (2017) Data activism as the new frontier of media activism. In: PickardVWYangG (eds) Media Activism in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 151–163.
51.
MilanSTreréE (2019) Big data from the south(s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media20(4): 319–335.
52.
NieborgDBPoellT (2018) The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society20(11): 4275–4292.
53.
Núñez-PuenteSFernández-RomeroDRubira-GarcíaR (2015) Online activism and subject construction of the victim of gender-based violence on spanish YouTube channels: Multimodal analysis and performativity. European Journal of Women’s Studies22(3): 319–333.
54.
OmenaJJRabelloETMintzAG (2020) Digital methods for hashtag engagement research. Social Media + Society6(3). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2056305120940697
55.
ÖzşenlerD (2021) Digital activism: An analysis of #challengeaccepted hashtag activism developed for violence against women. World Women Studies Journal6(1): 35–62.
56.
PapacharissiZ (2015) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
57.
ParadisCMatosM (2013) Los feminismos latinoamericanos y su compleja relación con el Estado: debates actuales [Latin American feminisms and their complex relationship with the State: current debates]. Íconos - Revista de Ciencias Sociales45: 91.
58.
PasqualeF (2016) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
59.
PearceWÖzkulaSMGreeneAK, et al. (2018) Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society23(2): 161–180.
60.
PetreCDuffyBEHundE (2019) “Gaming the system”: Platform paternalism and the politics of algorithmic visibility. Social Media + Society5(4). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2056305119879995
61.
RiederB (2015) YouTube Data Tools [software]. Digital Methods Initiative. Amsterdam University. Available at: https://tools.digitalmethods.net/netvizz/youtube/mod_videos_listphp (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
62.
RiederBMatamoros-FernándezACorominaÒ (2018) From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’: Investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence24(1): 50–68.
63.
RogersR (2017) Digital media for cross-platform analysis. In: BurgessJMarwickAPoellT (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. London: Sage, pp. 91–119.
64.
Rovira-SanchoG (2018) El devenir feminista de la acción colectiva: Las redes digitales y la política de prefiguración de las multitudes conectadas. Teknokultura15(2): Grupo de Investigación Cibersomosaguas: 223–240,
SerafiniP (2020) ‘A rapist in your path’: Transnational feminist protest and why (and how) performance matters. European Journal of Cultural Studies23(2): 290–295.
67.
Statista (2021) Instagram: users by country. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/578364/countries-with-most-instagram-users/ (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
68.
TarulloRGarcíaM (2020) Hashtivismo feminista en Instagram: #NiñasNoMadres de @actrices.argentinas [Feminist hashtivism on Instagram: #NiñasNoMadres of @actrices.argentinas]. Revista Dígitos1(6): 31.
69.
TreréE (2019) Hybrid media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. London: Routledge.
70.
UNESCO (2018) Día Internacional de la Eliminación de la Violencia contra las Mujeres [International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women]. Available at: https://es.unesco.org/commemorations/eliminationofviolenceagainstwomenday (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
71.
UN Women (2020a) COVID-19 y su impacto en la violencia contra las mujeres y niñas. [COVID-19 and its impact on violence against women and girls]. Available at: https://mexico.unwomen.org/es/digiteca/publicaciones/2020-nuevo/abril-2020/covid19-y-su-impacto-en-la-violencia-contra-las-mujeres-y-ninas (accessed 10 Jun 2021) .
72.
UN Women (2020b) Expertas de la ONU esperan que la legalización del aborto en Argentina sea un modelo para América Latina [UN experts hope that the legalization of abortion in Argentina will be a model for Latin America]. Available at: https://news.un.org/es/story/2020/12/1486122 (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
73.
Van-DijckJ (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society12(2): 197–208.
74.
Velasco-DomínguezMCastañeda-XochitlS (2020) Desaparición de mujeres y niñas en México: aportes desde los feminismos para entender procesos macrosociales. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales67: 95–117. [Disappearance of women and girls in Mexico: Contributions of feminisms for understanding macrosocial processes],
75.
VelkovaJKaunA (2021) Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society24(4): 523–540.
76.
Vicinitas (2018) Social media strategy for Twitter - 2018 Research on 100 Million Tweets Vicinitas. Available at: https://www.vicinitas.io/blog/twitter-social-media-strategy-2018-research-100-million-tweets (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
77.
Von-ScheveC (2019) Social collectives. In: SlabyJvon SchieveC (eds) Affective Societies: Key Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp. 267–278.
78.
WarnerM (2021) Publics and Counterpublics. London: Zone Books.
79.
Women Free of Violence (2020) PERÚ: Anaflex Mujer lanza campaña ‘Voces por el Cambio’ para luchar contra la violencia hacia las mujeres [PERU: Anaflex Mujer launches ‘Voices for Change’ campaign to struggle for eliminating violence against women]. In: Mujeres libres de violencia [Women free of Violence]. Available at: http://www.mujereslibresdeviolencia.usmp.edu.pe/peru-anaflex-mujer-lanza-campana-voces-por-el-cambio-para-luchar-contra-la-violencia-hacia-las-mujeres/ (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
80.
Yanisky-RavidSLahavBZ (2017) Public interest vs. Private lives-affording public figures privacy in the digital era: The three principle filtering model. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law19(4): 975–1014. Available at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jcl/vol19/iss4/4/ (accessed 10 Jun 2021).
