Recent scholarship has sought to emphasise boundaries and borders as being complex social institutions that play a vital role in mediating national and global flows. This article examines transactions occurring along the boundary between Hong Kong and Mainland China, which experienced a sudden ‘hardening’ owing to travel restrictions imposed following the outbreak of COVID-19. When individuals found themselves unable to physically cross the boundary as per usual, they instead turned to mobile media to enact everyday transactions – both financial and social – between the two regions. Calling upon the notion of ‘digital passages’, we argue that the appropriation of digital money infrastructures for managing such transactions should act as a reminder for scholars to productively engage with the various forms of boundaries and borders emerging within online spaces.
AlvarezRR (1995) The Mexican-US border: the making of an anthropology of borderlands. Annual Review of Anthropology24(1): 447–470.
2.
AndersonJO’DowdLWilsonTM (2003) Culture, co-operation and borders. In: AndersonJO’DowdLWilsonTM (eds) Culture and Cooperation in Europe’s Borderlands. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, pp. 13–29.
3.
ChanYW (2016) A tale of two borderlands: material lucidity and deep play in the transborder tourism space in Hong Kong and Macao. Asian Anthropology15(2): 186–206.
4.
ChanYWWomackB (2016) Not merely a border: borderland governance, development and transborder relations in Asia. Asian Anthropology15(2): 95–103.
5.
ChoiWK (2007) (Post)coloniality as a Chinese state of exception1. Postcolonial Studies10(4): 391–411.
6.
DoddN (2014) The Social Life of Money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
GuyerJI (2004) Marginal Gains: Monetary Transactions in Atlantic Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
HKSAR Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau (2019) Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Hong Kong: HKSAR Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau.
LaidlerKJLeeM (2015) Border trading and policing of everyday life in Hong Kong. In: PickeringSHamJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook on Crime and International Migration. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 316–328.
12.
LatoneroMKiftP (2018) On digital passages and borders: refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. Social Media + Society4(1): 1–11.
13.
LongN (2011) Bordering on immoral: piracy, education, and the ethics of cross-border cooperation in the Indonesia-Malaysia-Singapore Growth Triangle. Anthropological Theory11(4): 441–464.
14.
LuiT-l (2019) Flexible and plastic national identification in Hong Kong its historical configuration and changes since 1997. Journal of Asian Sociology48(1): 71–90.
15.
MathewsGMaEK-wLuiT-l (2008) Hong Kong, China: Learning to Belong to a Nation. London: Routledge.
16.
MezzadraSNeilsonB (2013) Border as Method: Or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
NewmanD (2006) The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography30(2): 143–161.
18.
ShenJLuoX (2013) From Fortress Hong Kong to Hong Kong–Shenzhen Metropolis: the emergence of government-led strategy for regional integration in Hong Kong. Journal of Contemporary China22(84): 944–965.
19.
SmartASmartJ (1998) Transational social networks and negotiated identities in interactions between Hong Kong and China. In: SmithMPGuarnizoLE (eds) Transnationalism from below. Milton: Routledge, pp. 103–129.
20.
StarSL (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 377–391.
21.
SwartzL (2020) New Money: How Payment Became Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
TaylorEBHorstHA (2018) A living fence: mobility and financial inclusion on the Haitian–Dominican Republic border. In: MaurerBMusarajSSmallI (eds) Money at the Margins: Global Perspectives on Technology, Financial Inclusion and Design. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 23–43.
23.
VertesiJ (2014) Seamful spaces: heterogeneous infrastructures in interaction. Science, Technology, & Human Values39(2): 264–284.
24.
YanY (2009) The Good Samaritan’s new trouble: a study of the changing moral landscape in contemporary China. Social Anthropology17(1): 9–24.
