In this article, we examine the digitalised emotional campaigning of one of Australia’s peak animal welfare body, Animals Australia, focusing on their most effective digital strategies associated with their campaigns against factory farming. Our broader interest lies with sounding out the affective affordances of the technologies informing such activist work; technologies of affect in a very significant sense. This discussion comprises three parts. First, we unpack the context for the problematic faced by animal and environmental activisms: neoliberalism, showing how neoliberal assumptions constrain such activisms to emotional appeals and denounce them for such strategising. Second, we sound out some of the affordances of digital media technologies for affectively oriented activisms; and finally, we delve into some of Animals Australia’s digital campaigning with regard to issues of factory farming in order to show the efficacy of such affectively oriented mediated strategising for the forming of new relations with factory farm.
ABC News (2013) Animal rights activists ‘akin to terrorists’, says NSW Minister Katrina Hodgkinson. ABC News, 18July. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/gq5pu94 (accessed 26 July 2017).
4.
AhmedS (2004a) Affective economies. Social Text79(2): 117–139.
5.
AhmedS (2004b) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6.
AkinAIEncinaCRestivoMet al (2012) Old wine in a new cask? Protest cycles in the age of the new social media. The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations13(1): 89–103.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
14.
BimberBFlanaginAJStohlC (2005) Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory15(4): 365–388.
15.
BrownW (2005) Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
BurgessJGreenJ (2009) Youtube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
CartyVOnyettJ (2006) Protest, cyberactivism and new social movements: the reemergence of the peace movement post 9/11. Social Movement Studies5(3): 229–249.
18.
ChenPJ (2016) Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of Sydney Press.
19.
CouldryN (2015) The myth of ‘us’: digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity. Information, Communication & Society18(6): 608–626.
HarveyD (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
HerzogHAGoldenLL (2009) Moral emotions and social activism: the case of animal rights. Journal of Social Issues65(3): 485–498.
29.
HuntSABenfordRD (2004) Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. In SnowDASouleSAKriesiH (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 433–457.
30.
JacobssonKLindblomJ (2013) Emotion work in animal rights activism: a moral-sociological perspective. Acta Sociologica56(1): 55–68.
31.
JasperJMNelkinD (1992) The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest. New York: Free Press.
32.
JasperJMPoulsenJ (1995) Recruiting strangers and friends: moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems42(4): 493–512.
33.
KharroubTBasO (2016) Social media and protests: an examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society18(9): 1973–1992.
34.
KirjnerD (2015) Painfully, from the first-person singular to first-person plural: the role of feminism in the study of the Anthropocene. In: Human-Animal Research Network Editorial Collective (ed.) Animals in the Anthropocene: Critical Perspectives on Non-human Futures. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Sydney University Press, pp. 135–150.
35.
KuntsmanA (2012) Introduction: affective fabrics of digital culture. In: KaratzogianniAKuntsmanA (eds) Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion: Feelings, Affect and Technological Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–17.
36.
McLaganMMcKeeY (2012) Introduction. In: McLaganMMcKeeY (eds) Sensible Politics: The Visual Culture of Nongovernmental Activism. New York: Zone Books, pp. 9–26.
37.
MaddisonSMartinG (2010) Introduction to ‘surviving neoliberalism: the persistence of Australian social movements’. Social Movement Studies9(2): 101–120.
38.
MartinG (2015) Understanding Social Movements. Oxon: Routledge.
MelucciA (2013) The process of collective identity. In: JohnstonHKlandermansB (eds) Social Movements and Culture. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis, pp. 73–109.
41.
MiloniDLTrigaV (2012) Web 2.0 and deliberation: an introduction. International Journal of Electronic Governance5(1): 3–10.
42.
MitchellWJT (2013) Image, space, revolution: the arts of occupation. In: MitchellWJTHarcourtBETaussigM (eds) Occupy: Three Inquiries in Disobedience. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 93–130.
43.
MorrisonA (2014) Facebook and coaxed affordances. In: PolettiARakJ (eds) Identity Technologies: Constructing the Self Online. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 112–131.
44.
MunroL (2004) Animals, ‘nature’ and human interests. In: WhiteR (ed.) Controversies in Environmental Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–76.
45.
MunroL (2015) The live animal export controversy in Australia: a moral crusade made for the mass media. Social Movement Studies14(2): 214–219.
46.
NabiRL (2009) The effect of disgust-eliciting visuals on attitudes toward animal experimentation. Communication Quarterly46(4): 472–484.
47.
PapacharissiZA (2015) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
PapacharissiZA (2016) Affective publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society19(3): 307–324.
49.
PoellTVan DijckJ (2015) Social media and activist communication. In: AttonC (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media. London: Routledge, pp. 527–537.
50.
PolettaFJasperJM (2001) Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology27: 283–305.
51.
PotterW (2011) Green Is the New Red: An Insider’s Account of a Social Movement Under Siege. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
RodanDMummeryJ (2014a) Platforms and activism: sharing ‘my make it possible story’ narratives. In: proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand communication association conference: the digital and the social: communication for inclusion and exchange. Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, July, pp. 9–11. Available at: http://www.anzca.net/conferences/past-conferences/2014-conf.html (accessed 26 July 2017).
54.
RodanDMummeryJ (2014b) The ‘make it possible’ multimedia campaign: generating a new ‘everyday’ in animal welfare. Media International Australia153: 78–87.
55.
RodanDMummeryJ (2016) Doing animal welfare activism everyday: questions of identity. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies30(4): 381–396.
56.
RodanDMummeryJ (2017) Activism and Digital Culture in Australia. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
57.
RuchtD (2004) The quadruple ‘A’: media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In: Van De DonkWLoaderBDNixonPGet al (eds) Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements. London: Routledge, pp. 29–56.
58.
RuchtD (2013) Protest movements and their media usages. In: CammaertsBMattoniAMcCurdyP (eds) Mediation and Protest Movements. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 249–268.
59.
SarantakosS (2005) Social Research, 3rd edn.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
ShirkyC (2011) The political power of social media: technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs90(1). Available at: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~beki/cs4001/Shirky.pdf (accessed 26 July 2017).
62.
ShotwellA (2011) Knowing Otherwise: Race, Gender, and Implicit Understanding. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
63.
SmithRG (2015) Affect and American Literature in the Age of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SorensonJ (2009) Constructing terrorists: propaganda about animal rights. Critical Studies on Terrorism2(2): 237–256.
TimoshankoAC (2015) Limitations of the market-based approach to the regulation of farm animal welfare. University of New South Wales Law Journal38(2). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2611886 (accessed 26 July 2017).
67.
TorresB (2007) Making a Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
WatkinsM (2010) Desiring recognition, accumulating affect. In: GreggMSeigworthGJ (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. London: Duke University Press, pp. 250-285.
70.
WeerakkodyN (2009) Research Methods for Media and Communication. South Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Oxford University Press.
71.
WrennCL (2013) Resonance of moral shocks in abolitionist animal rights advocacy: overcoming contextual constraints. Society & Animals21(4): 379–394.
