In this article, I argue for a public relations research agenda which places new divisions of labour and worker subjectivities at the centre. While communication technology may be facilitating greater work flexibility, research is needed into how work processes interact with broader inequality regimes, producing new discourses and possibilities for resistance among public relations practitioners. I discuss the benefits of sociological frameworks which position work as a central organising process through which power relations are constructed and maintained. I then propose that Bourdieu’s theory of habitus complements Glucksmann’s ‘Total Social Organisation of Labour’ (TSOL) framework, combining a focus on power relations within a field with a feminist analysis of new divisions and processes of labour. After briefly discussing cultural and public relations scholarship which problematises work from a critical perspective, I conclude by framing a critical feminist public relations research agenda on labour, which utilises Bourdieuvian theory and Glucksmann’s TSOL.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20(4): 441–464.
2.
AdkinsLSkeggsB (2004) Feminism after Bourdieu. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
AldooryLJiangHTothE. (2008) Is it still just a women’s issue? A study of work-life balance among men and women in public relations. Public Relations Journal2(4): 1–20.
4.
Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) (2011) Broken Concepts: The Australian Communications Legislative Landscape. Canberra, ACT, Australia: ACMA.
BergerBK (2005) Power over, power with, and power to relations: Critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism. Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 5–28.
7.
BergerBKMengJ (2014) Public Relations Leaders as Sensemakers: A Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management. London: Routledge.
8.
BourdieuP (1980) The Logic of Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (1990) In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
DalyTArmstrongPLowndesR (2014) Liminality in Ontario’s long-term care homes: Private companions in the space ‘betwixt and between’ formal/informal regulation and care work. In: The Association of Industrial Relations Academics in Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ) conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 5–7February.
15.
DavisA (2000) Public relations, news production and changing patterns of source access in the British national media. Media, Culture & Society22(1): 39–59.
DesaiRWolfK (2014) Is social media really the answer? How issues create communities and communities create issues online. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal15(1): 71–88.
18.
DeuzeM (2007) Media Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
DickP (2008) Resistance, gender, and Bourdieu’s notion of field. Management Communication Quarterly21(3): 327–343.
20.
EdwardsL (2010) ‘Race’ in public relations. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 205–222.
21.
EdwardsLHodgesCE (2011) Public Relations, Society & Culture: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. London: Routledge.
22.
FitchKThirdA (2014) Ex-journos and promo girls: feminization and professionalization in the Australian public relations industry. In: DaymonCDemetriousK (eds) Gender and Public Relations: Critical Perspectives on Voice, Image and Identity. London: Routledge, pp. 247–267.
23.
FitchKJamesMMotionJ (2016) Talking back: reflecting on feminism, public relations and research. Public Relations Review42(2): 279–287.
24.
GillR (2014) Unspeakable inequalities: post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity, and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society21(4): 509–528.
25.
GillRPrattA (2008) In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society25(7–8): 1–30.
26.
GlucksmannM (1986) In a class of their own? Women workers in the new industries in inter-war Britain. Feminist Review24(1): 7–37.
27.
GlucksmannM (2000) Cottons and Casuals: The Gendered Organisation of Labour in Time and Space. Durham: Sociology Press.
28.
GlucksmannM (2005) Shifting boundaries and interconnections: extending the ‘total social organisation of labour’. Sociological Review53(2): 19–36.
29.
GlucksmannM (2009) Formations, connections and divisions of labour. Sociology43(5): 878–895.
30.
GlucksmannMNolanJ (2007) New technologies and the transformations of women’s labour at home and work. Equal Opportunities International26(2): 96–112.
31.
GreggM (2008) The normalisation of flexible female labour in the information economy. Feminist Media Studies8(3): 285–299.
32.
HesmondhalghDBakerS (2010) ‘A very complicated version of freedom’: conditions and experiences of creative labour in three cultural industries. Poetics38(1): 4–20.
HoltzhausenDRVotoR (2002) Resistance from the margins: the postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research14(1): 57–84.
35.
HuangJYangA (2015) Implementing dialogic communication: a survey of IPR, PRSA, and IABC Members. Public Relations Review41(3): 376–377.
36.
JamesM (2007) A review of the impact of new media on public relations: challenges for terrain, practice and education. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal8(1): 137–148.
37.
JamesM (2015) Situating a new voice in public relations: the application of positioning theory to research and practice. Media International Australia154: 34–41.
L’EtangJMcKieDSnowN. (eds) (2015) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations. London: Routledge.
40.
OmarKStockdaleRScheepersH (2014) Social media use in local Government: an Australian perspective. International Journal of Public Administration37(10): 666–675.
41.
PhillipsLBrabhamD (2012) How today’s digital landscape redefines the notion of power in public relations. Prism9(2): 1–17.
42.
PlaceKR (2015) Binaries, continuums, and intersections: women public relations professionals’ understandings of gender. Public Relations Inquiry4(1): 61–78.
43.
PompperD (2014) Interrogating inequalities perpetuated in a feminized field: using critical race theory and the intersectionality lens to render visible that which should not be disaggregated. In: DaymonCDemetriousK (eds) Gender and Public Relations: Critical Perspectives on Voice, Image and Identity. London: Routledge, pp. 67–86.
44.
ShenHJiangH (2013) Profiling public relations practitioners’ work-life conflict: from a diversity lens. Public Relations Journal7(2): 71–95.
45.
WheelerKGlucksmannM (2013) Economies of recycling, ‘consumption work’ and divisions of labour in Sweden and England. Sociological Research Online18(1): 9.
46.
YeomansL (2014) Gendered performance and identity work in PR consulting relationships: a UK perspective. In: DaymonCDemetriousK (eds) Gender and Public Relations: Critical Perspectives on Voice, Image and Identity. London: Routledge, pp. 87–107.
