Creative Nation confirmed the shift by federal governments to viewing popular music as part of the Australian cultural economy, where the ‘contemporary music’ industries were expected to contribute to economic growth as much as providing a set of creative practices for musicians and audiences. In the 19 years between Creative Nation and Creative Australia, much has changed. This article examines relationships between the music industries, governments and audiences in three areas. First, it charts the funding of popular music within the broader cultural sector to illuminate the competing discourses and demands of the popular and classical music sectors in federal budgets. Second, it traces configurations of popular music and national identity as part of national policy. Third, the article explores how both national policy documents position Australian popular music amid global technological and regulatory shifts. As instruments of cultural nationalism, Creative Nation and Creative Australia are useful texts in assessing the opportunities and limits of nations in asserting coherent national strategies.
Australian Government (2011) National Digital Strategy: Leveraging the National Broadband Network to Drive Australia’s Digital Productivity. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.
6.
Australian Government (2014) Online Copyright Infringement Discussion Paper. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government.
7.
Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) (2013) Copyright and the digital economy: summary report. ALRC report 122, November. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government.
8.
BourdieuP (1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Commonwealth of Australia (1994) Creative Nation: Commonwealth Cultural Policy. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Department of Communications and the Arts.
11.
Commonwealth of Australia (2010) Strategic Contemporary Music Industry Plan. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.
Commonwealth of Australia (2013) Creative Australia: National Cultural Policy. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government.
14.
CouldryN (2003) Media, Symbolic Power and the Limits of Bourdieu’s Field Theory (Media@lse Electronic Working Paper). London: London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London.
15.
CraikJ (2013) Creative Australia: missed opportunity or new paradigm for a national cultural policy?Asia Pacific Journal of Arts and Cultural Management10(1): 48–54.
GrenfellM (2013) Bourdieu and the music field. Presentation, Division of Education, Arts and Social Sciences, University of South Australia, Magill Campus, 13November. Available at: www.unisa.edu.au/global/eass/cred/musisfield.pdf
LeungH (2009) Myth of the digital dilemma: deciphering the legal antagonism towards online piracy. Canterbury Law Review15: 67–100.
33.
Liberal Party of Australia (2011) Arts for All: Our Future Action Plan. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Liberal Party of Australia.
34.
McIntyreP (2011) Rethinking the creative process: the systems model of creativity applied to popular music songwriting. Journal of Music Technology and Education4(1): 77–90.
