Focusing on the Australian KFC T20 Big Bash League (BBL), this article explores the innovative televisual technologies that represent T20 cricket as an action packed ‘smash and bash’ spectacle. An array of innovative technologies is deployed to aesthetically and affectively re-present the BBL. Cameras and microphones are embedded within the field of play, operate in highly mobile and fluid ways, and are framed in close proximity to the action – particularly when placed on the players themselves. The BBL provides intersecting affective layers for viewer engagement built upon tools for analysis, sites of commodification, visual renditions of pseudo-player perspectives and an emphasis on fast-paced entertainment. By constructing degrees of sensory invigoration and vicarious involvement for both casual and invested viewers, these innovative technologies mobilise ‘smash and bash’ cricket as an affective televisual spectacle.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgurC.2013, ‘A Foreign Field no Longer: India, the IPL, and the Global Business of Cricket’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 541–56.
2.
AxfordB.HugginsR.2011, ‘Cricket for People Who Don't Like Cricket? Twenty20 as Expression of the Cultural and Media Zeitgeist’, Sport in Society, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1326–39.
3.
BoyleR.2014, ‘Television Sport in the Age of Screens and Content’, Television and New Media, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 746–51.
CloughP.HalleyJ. (eds) 2007, The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
6.
EnglishP, 2011, ‘Twenty20 and the Changing Face of Australian Cricket’, Sport in Society, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1369–82.
7.
FlemingD.SturmD.2011, Media, Masculinities and the Machine: F1, Transformers and Fantasizing Technology at Its Limits, Continuum, New York.
8.
GalilyY.2014, ‘When the Medium Becomes “Well Done”: Sport, Television, and Technology in the Twenty-First Century’, Television and New Media, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 717–24.
9.
GreggM.SeigworthG. (eds) 2010, The Affect Theory Reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
10.
GrossbergL.1992, We Gotta Get Out of this Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern Culture, Routledge, New York.
11.
GuptaA.2011, ‘The IPL and the Indian Domination of Global Cricket’, Sport in Society, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1316–25.
12.
HarrissI.1990, ‘Packer, Cricket and Postmodernism’, in RoweD.LawrenceG. (eds), Sport and Leisure: Trends in Australian Popular Culture, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Sydney, pp. 109–21.
HorneJ.2006, Sport in Consumer Society, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
16.
HutchinsB.RoweD.2012, Sport Beyond Television: The Internet, Digital Media and the Rise of Networked Media Sport, Routledge, London.
17.
HutchinsB.RoweD. (eds.) 2013, Digital Media Sport: Technology, Power and Culture in the Network Society, Routledge, New York.
18.
KellnerD.2003, Media Spectacle, Routledge, New York.
19.
KellnerD.2010, ‘Media Spectacle and Media Events: Some Critical Reflections’, in CouldryN.HeppA.KrotzF. (eds), Media Events in a Global Age, Routledge, New York, pp. 76–91.
20.
KennedyE.PussardH.ThorntonA.2006, ‘“Leap for London”? Investigating the Affective Power of the Sport Spectacle’, World Leisure Journal, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 6–21.
21.
MassumiB.2002, Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
RoweD.2011, Global Media Sport: Flows, Forms and Futures, Bloomsbury, London.
24.
RumfordC.2011a, ‘Guest Editor's Introduction: Twenty20 and the Future of Cricket’, Sport in Society, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1311–15.
25.
RumfordC.2011b, ‘Twenty20, Global Disembedding, and the Rise of the “Portfolio Player”’, Sport in Society, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1358–68.
26.
RumfordC. (ed.) 2013, Twenty20 and the Future of Cricket, Routledge, London.
27.
StoddartB.2011, ‘Game for Hire: Twenty20 and the New Cricket Mercenary’, Sport in Society, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1421–27.
28.
SturmD.2011, ‘Masculinities, Affect and the (Re)place(ment) of Stardom in Formula One Fan Leisure Practices’, Annals of Leisure Research, vol. 14, pp. 224–41.
29.
SturmD.2014, ‘A Glamorous and High-Tech Global Spectacle of Speed: Formula One Motor Racing as Mediated, Global and Corporate Spectacle’, in DashperK.FletcherT.McCulloughN. (eds), Sports Events, Society and Culture, Routledge, London, pp. 68–82.
30.
ThorpeH.RinehartR.E.2010, ‘Alternative Sport and Affect: Non-Representational Theory Examined’, Sport in Society, vol. 13, pp. 1268–91.
31.
WennerL.2014, ‘On the Limits of the New and the Lasting Power of the Mediasport Interpellation’, Television and New Media, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 732–40.
32.
WhannelG.1992, Fields in Vision: Television Sport and Cultural Transformation, Routledge, London.
33.
WhannelG.2014, ‘The Paradoxical Character of Live Television Sport in the Twenty-First Century’, Television and New Media, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 769–76.
