Although livestock welfare issues were once barely visible to mainstream consumers, animal welfare activists now combine traditional public media advocacy with digital media advocacy to spread their campaign message and mobilise consumers. This article examines one attempt to mainstream animal welfare issues: Animals Australia's ‘Make It Possible’ multimedia campaign. Specifically, we contend that the campaign puts into circulation an ‘affective economy’ (Ahmed, 2004a, 2004b) aimed at proposing and entrenching new modes of everyday behaviour. Core affective positions and their circulation in this economy are considered from three interrelated articulations of this campaign: the release of and public response to the YouTube campaign video; Coles' short-lived offering of campaign shopping bags; and public engagement in the ‘My Make It Possible Story’ website. Analysis also opens up broader questions concerning the relationship between online activism and everyday life, asking how articulations in one domain translate to everyday practices.
CochraneA.2012, Animal Rights Without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligation, Columbia University Press, New York.
13.
CloughP.2010, ‘The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia, and Bodies’, in GreggM.SeigworthG.J. (eds), The Affect Theory Reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 206–25.
GlickmanL.B.2009, Buying Power: A History of Consumer Activism in America, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
18.
GoodwinJ.JasperJ.M. (eds) 2003, The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
19.
HollenbeckC.R.ZinkhanG.M.2006, ‘Consumer Activism on the Internet: The Role of Anti-brand Communities’, Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 479–85.
20.
JasperJ.M.1998, ‘The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions In and Around Social Movements’, Sociological Forum, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 397–424.
21.
JasperJ.M.NelkinD.1992, The Animals Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest, Free Press, New York.
22.
JasperJ.M.PoulsenJ.1995, ‘Recruiting Strangers and Friends: Moral Shocks and Social Networks in Animal Rights and Anti-nuclear Protests’, Social Problems, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 493–512.
23.
JoyM.2008, Strategic Action for Animals: A Handbook on Strategic Movement Building, Organizing, and Activism for Animal Liberation, Lantern Books, New York.
KuntsmanA.2012, ‘Introduction: Affective Fabrics of Digital Culture’, in KaratzogianniA.KuntsmanA. (eds), Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion: Feeling, Affect and Technological Change, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 1–17.
LangeP.2008, ‘Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 361–80.
28.
LoweB.M.2006, Emerging Moral Vocabularies: The Creation and Establishment of New Forms of Moral and Ethical Meanings, Lexington Books, Oxford.
SnowD.A.BenfordR.D.1988, ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization’, in KlandermansB.KriesiH.TarrowS. (eds), From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 197–217.
WatkinsM.2010, ‘Desiring Recognition, Accumulating Affect’, in GreggM.SeigworthG.J. (eds), The Affect Theory Reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 250–85.
43.
WeerakkodyN.2009, Research Methods for Media and Communication, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
WilliamsR.H.1994, ‘Movement Dynamics and Social Change: Transforming Fundamentalist Ideology and Organizations’, in MartyM.E.ApplebyR.S. (eds), Accounting for Fundamentalisms: The Dynamic Character of Movements, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 785–833.
46.
WrennC.L.2012, ‘Applying Social Movement Theory to Nonhuman Rights Mobilization and the Importance of Faction Hierarchies’, Peace Studies Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 27–44.
47.
WrennC.L.2013, ‘Resonance of Moral Shocks in Abolitionist Animal Rights Advocacy: Overcoming Contextual Constraints’, Society & Animals, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 379–94.
