This article uses the Foucauldian framework of governmentality and the particular concept of dispositif to analyse two Vietnamese television dramas, Hanoian (1996) and The City Stories (2002). I argue that the first drama presents a memory dispositif of the recent wartime to express dissatisfaction about contemporary situations. Meanwhile, the second drama sought to build a ‘new yesterday’ to engage Vietnamese viewers in the ongoing economic transformations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngI.1985, Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination, Methuen, London.
2.
BasuL.2011, ‘Memory Dispositifs and National Identities: The Case of Ned Kelly’, Memory Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–41.
3.
BrownM.E.1994, Soap Opera and Women's Talk: The Pleasure of Resistance, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4.
ÐặngA.Ð.1987, ‘Khi Ông Tuóng Về Huu Xuất Hiện’, Văn Nghệ, no. 37, n.p.
5.
DavisF.1979, Yearning for Yesterday: A Sociology of Nostalgia, Free Press, New York.
6.
DeleuzeG.1988, Foucault, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
7.
DrummondL.B.W.2003, ‘Popular Television and Images of Urban Life’, in DrummondL.B.ThomasM. (eds), Everyday Life and Popular Culture in Contemporary Vietnam, Routledge, London, pp. 155–69
8.
FoucaultM.1980, ‘The Confession of the Flesh’, in GordonC. (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Harvester, Brighton, pp. 194–228.
9.
FoucaultM.1984, The Use of Pleasure, Penguin, London.
10.
FoucaultM.1991, ‘Politics and the Study of Discourse’, in BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP. (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 53–72.
11.
FoucaultM.1996, ‘Film and Popular Memory’, in LotringerS. (ed.), Foucault Live — Collected Interviews, 1961–1984, Semiotext(e), New York.
12.
FoucaultM.2000, ‘Governmentality’, in FaubionJ.D. (ed.), Power, New Press, New York, pp. 201–22.
13.
FoucaultM.2003a, ‘The Subject and Power’, in RabinowP.RoseN. (eds), The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, New Press, New York, pp. 124–44.
14.
FoucaultM.2003b, ‘Technologies of the Self’, in RabinowP.RoseN. (eds), The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, New Press, New York, pp. 145–69.
15.
GillenJ.2011, ‘A Battle Worth Winning: The Service of Culture to the Communist Party of Vietnam in the Contemporary Era’, Political Geography, vol. 30, no. 5, pp 272–81.
16.
GuggenheimM.2009, ‘Building Memory: Architecture, Networks and Users’, Memory Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–53.
17.
HarmsE.2012, ‘Neo-Geomancy and Real Estate Fever in Postreform Vietnam’, positions, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 405–34.
18.
HawkinsG.2001, ‘The Ethics of Television’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 412–26.
19.
HồC.M.2000, Hồ Chí Minh Toàn Tập, Chính Trị Quốc Gia Press, Hà Nội.
20.
HoTai H.T.2001, ‘Faces of Remembrance and Forgetting’, in HoTai H.T. (ed.), The Country of Memory: Remaking the Past in Late Socialist Vietnam, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 167–95.
21.
HobsbawnE.J.1992, ‘Introduction: Inventing Traditions’, in HobsbawnE.J.RangerT.O. (eds), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–14.
22.
LeshkowichA.M.2006, ‘Woman, Buddhist, Entrepreneur: Gender, Moral Values, and Class Anxiety in Late Socialist Vietnam’, Journal of Vietnamese Studies, vol. 1, nos 1–2, pp. 277–313.
23.
MalarneyS.K.2002, Culture, Ritual and Revolution in Vietnam, Routledge, London.
24.
MarrD. (ed.) 1998, Mass Media in Vietnam, ANU Press, Canberra.
25.
OngA.1997, ‘“A Momentary Glow of Fraternity”: Narratives of Chinese Nationalism and Capitalism’, Identities, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 331–66.
26.
PelleyP.M.2002: Postcolonial Vietnam: New Histories of the National Past, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
27.
QianG.2008. ‘A Trip Down Memory Lane: Remaking and Rereading the Red Classics’, in ZhuY.KeaneM.BaiR. (eds), TV Drama in China, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp. 157–72.
28.
SurborgB.2006, ‘Advanced Services, the New Economy and the Built Environment in Hanoi’, Cities, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 239–49.
29.
TodorovaM.A.N.GilleZ. (eds) 2010, Post-Communist Nostalgia, Berghahn Books, New York.
30.
TranH.Q.2000, Truyền Thông Ðại Chúng và Công Chúng — Truòng Hop Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh, unpublished PhD Thesis, Vietnam Institute of Sociology.
31.
ZhuY.2008. ‘Yongzheng Dynasty and Totalitarian Nostalgia’, in ZhuY.KeaneM.BaiR. (eds), TV Drama in China, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp. 3–17.
