The role of mass media in framing public discourse about gendered life courses is a fundamental mechanism for reinforcing patriarchal culture. Women who do not comply with the marriage and maternity mandate are subject to the type of personalised reaction experienced by Australia's first female prime minister that triggered renewed public debate about misogyny in social organisation. Using case study methodology and framing analysis, I examined a feature published in the national broadsheet about marriage trends that made patriarchy's preferred model explicit. The communication practices used in the feature are discussed in terms of ‘truth’, and how they might reflect and confirm the attitudes and beliefs of the newspaper's readership.
ArndtB.2013, ‘For Better or for Worse’, Weekend Australian Magazine, 11–12 May, pp. 22–5.
5.
AughtersonK. (ed.) 1995, Renaissance Woman: A Sourcebook. Constructions of Femininity in England, Routledge, London.
6.
BernardJ.1972, The Future of Marriage, Souvenir Press, London.
7.
BrookmyreC.2006, A Tale Etched in Blood and Hard Black Pencil, Little, Brown, London.
8.
CameronR.1983, ‘Census of Population and Housing, 30 June 1981’, in Cross-classified Characteristics of Persons and Dwellings Australia, ABS, Canberra.
ConnellR.2000, ‘Arms and the Man: Using the New Research on Masculinity to Understand Violence and Promote Peace in the Contemporary World’, in BrienesI.ConnellR.EideI. (eds), Male Roles, Masculinities and Violence, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 21–33.
11.
CumminsR.WoernerJ.TomynA.GibsonA.KnappT.M.2005, The Wellbeing of Australians — Personal Relationships, Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Geelong.
12.
De VogliR.ChandolaT.MarmotM.2007, ‘Negative Aspects of Close Relationships and Heart Disease’, Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 167, pp. 1951–7.
13.
DePauloB.2007, Singled Out: How Singles are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After, St Martin's Press, New York.
14.
DienerE.SuhE.LucasR.SmithH.1999, Subjective Well-being: Three Decades of Progress, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 125, pp. 276–302.
15.
EdyJ.SnidowS.2011, ‘Making News Necessary: How Journalism Resists Alternative Media's Challenge’, Journal of Communication, vol. 61, pp. 816–34.
16.
FoucaultM.1980, Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, Harvester Press, Brighton.
17.
FowlerR.2003, Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press, Routledge, London.
18.
FriedmanH.MartinL.2011, The Longevity Project: Surprising Discoveries for Health and Long Life from the Landmark Eight-Decade Study, Hudson Street Press, New York.
19.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ.2010, ‘What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from US Daily Newspapers’, Econometrica, vol. 78, pp. 35–71.
20.
GilesD.ShawR.2009, ‘The Psychology of News Influence and the Development of Media Framing Analysis’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vols 3/4, pp. 375–93.
21.
GillisJ., 1985, For Better for Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22.
GillisJ.1996, A World of Their Own Making: Myth, Ritual, and the Quest for Family Values, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
23.
GrahamM.RichS., 2012, What's ‘Childless’ Got to Do with It?, Alfred Deakin Research Institute, Geelong.
24.
HymowitzK.CarrollJ.WilcoxB.KayeK.2013, Knot Yet: The Benefits and Costs of Delayed Marriage in America, University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VA.
25.
KipnisL.2003, Against Love: A Polemic, Vintage Books, New York.
26.
KitzingerJ.2000, 'Media Templates: Patterns of Association and the (Re)construction of Meaning Over Time, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 22, pp. 61–84.
27.
KlinenbergE.2012, Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone, Penguin, New York.
28.
LangfordW.1999, Revolutions of the Heart: Gender, Power and the Delusions of Love, Routledge, London.
ShoebridgeA.2012, Single Women: A History of Misogyny, Lambert Academic, Saarbrücken.
39.
SummersA.2013, The Misogyny Factor, UNSW Press, Sydney.
40.
UssherJ.2011, The Madness of Women: Myth and Experience, Routledge, London.
41.
Van DijkT.1995, ‘Power and the News Media’, in PaletzD. (ed.), Political Communication and Action, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, pp. 9–36.
42.
Van DijkT.2006, ‘Discourse and Manipulation’, Discourse & Society, vol. 17, pp. 359–83.
43.
Van GorpB.VettehenP.BeentjesJ.2009, ‘Challenging the Frame in the News: The Role of Issue Involvement, Attitude, and Competing Frames’, Journal of Media Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 161–70.
44.
VicinusM.1985, Independent Women: Work and Community for Single Women, 1850–1920, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
45.
WilkinsR. (ed.) 2013, Families, Incomes and Jobs, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Melbourne.
46.
WilkinsR.WarrenD.HahnM.HoungB.2010, Families, Incomes and Jobs, Vol. 5: A Statistical Report on Waves 1 to 7 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Melbourne.
