The Role of Local Intermediaries in the Process of Digitally Engaging Non-Users of the Internet

Abstract

This article aims to provide a better understanding of the process of becoming digitally engaged. Those who cannot utilise digital networks are systematically disadvantaged, particularly in a hyper-connected world in which services are provided online by default. By interviewing and observing clients and trainers at a telecentre, the ACT Digital Hub, this study investigated the process that non-internet users undergo – from digital readiness to digital engagement – in order to become adept users. Intermediaries such as telecentres play a crucial role in equipping non-users with digital readiness, which is a precursor to digital media literacy. Social environment also plays a significant role in non-users' digital readiness. Rather than focusing merely on the provision of access to bridge the digital divide, we need a longer-term investment in adequate environments, such as sustainable community training centres, that nurture digital readiness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apperley

Nansen

Arnold

Wilken

2011, ‘Broadband in the Burbs: NBN Infrastructure, Spectrum Politics and the Digital Home’, M/C Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/400

Arifoglu

Afacan

2013, ‘An Analysis of Public Internet Access Points (PIAPs)’, Journal of Community Informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/561

Bailur

2007, ‘Using Stakeholder Theory to Analyze Telecenter Projects’, Information Technologies & International Development, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 61–80.

Bandiera

Rasul

2006, ‘Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique’, The Economic Journal, vol. 116, no. 514, pp. 869–902.

Baron

L.F.

Gomez

2013, ‘Relationships and Connectedness: Weak Ties that Help Social Inclusion Through Public Access Computing’, Information Technology for Development, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 271–95.

Boschma

2005, ‘Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment’, Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61–74.

Conley

T.G.

Udry

C.R.

2010, ‘Learning About a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana’, The American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 35–69.

Andrade

A.E. Díaz

Urquhart

2009, ‘The Value of Extended Networks: Social Capital in an ICT Intervention in Rural Peru’, Information Technology for Development, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 108–32.

Eynon

Geniets

2012, On the Periphery? Understanding Low and Discontinued Internet Use Amongst Young People in Britain, report for the Nominet Trust, London.

10.

Federal Communications Commission 2010, Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan, US Government, Washington, DC.

11.

Fuchs

R.P.

1998, Little Engines That Did: Case Histories from the Global Telecentre Movement, Telecenter.org/ IDRC, Ottawa.

12.

Goolsbee

Klenow

P.J.

2002, ‘Evidence on Learning and Network Externalities in the Diffusion of Home Computers’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 317–44.

13.

Gurstein

2003, ‘Effective Use: A Community Informatics Strategy Beyond the Digital Divide’, First Monday, vol. 8, no. 12, http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1107/1027

14.

Hargittai

Walejko

2008, ‘The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 239–56.

15.

Helsper

E.J.

2011, The Emergence of a Digital Underclass: Digital Policies in the UK and Evidence for Inclusion, LSE Media Policy Project, London.

16.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C.J.

McNeal

R.S.

2008, Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

17.

Murdock

2002, ‘Review Article: Debating Digital Divides’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 385–90.

18.

Nansen

Wilken

Arnold

Gibbs

2013, ‘Digital Literacies and the National Broadband Network: Competency, Legibility, Context’, Media International Australia, no. 147, pp. 18–28.

19.

Powell

Bryne

Dailey

2010, ‘The Essential Internet: Digital Exclusion in Low-Income American Communities’, Policy & Internet, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 161–92.

20.

Rennie

Crouch

Wright

Thomas

2011, Home Internet for Remote Indigenous Communities, Australian Communications Consumer Action Network, Sydney.

21.

Rogers

E.M.

2005, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn, The Free Press, New York.

22.

Saunders

Sutherland

Davidson

Hampshire

King

Taylor

2005, Experiencing Poverty: The Voices of Low-Income Australians, Stage One: Focus Group Outcomes Report, UNSW Social Policy Research Centre, Sydney.

23.

Sey

Fellows

2009, Literature Review on the Impact of Public Access to Information and Communication Technologies, CIS Working Paper, 6. University of Washington Center for Information and Society, Seattle.

24.

Sourbati

2009, ‘Media Literacy and Universal Access in Europe’, The Information Society: An International Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 248–54.

25.

Warren

2007, ‘The Digital Vicious Cycle: Links Between Social Disadvantage and Digital Exclusion in Rural Areas’, Telecommunications Policy, vol. 31, nos 6–7, pp. 374–88.

26.

White

Selwyn

2013, ‘Moving on-line? An Analysis of Patterns of Adult Internet Use in the UK, 2002–2010’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–27.

27.

Wolske

Gibbs

Kehoe

Jones

Irish

2013, ‘Outcome of Applying Evidence-Based Design to Public Computing Centers: A Preliminary Study’, The Journal of Community Informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, http://go.illinois.edu/PCCRedesignPaper

28.

Zillien

Hargittai

2009, ‘Digital Distinction: Status-specific Types of Internet Usage’, Social Science Quarterly, no. 90, pp. 274–91.