Conflict over landscape use, resource access and environmental futures has become a central feature of contemporary political life. Increasingly, these conflicts are articulated, negotiated and potentially resolved across national boundaries and complex networks of media and communications. Within the context of intensifying pressure for resources, market opportunities and changing media practices, this article examines the multi-directional and multi-layered flows of political communication and action that are developing within the Asian region. It outlines a case of recent environmental protests targeted at Japanese and Malaysian companies involved in the procurement and sale of Australian forest products, and reveals how distant supporters are being enabled to join with those affected locally to resist development, end resource procurement and undermine growth strategies.
FraserN.2007, ‘Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 7–30.
22.
FreemanL.A.2000, Information Cartels and Japan's Mass Media, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
23.
GaleF.HawardM.2011, Global Commodity Governance: State Responses to Sustainable Forest and Fisheries Certification, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
24.
HannerzU.2003, ‘Being there … and There … and There! Reflections on Multi-site Ethnography’, Ethnography, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 201–16.
HutchinsB.LesterL.2006, ‘Environmental Protest and Tap-dancing with the Media in the Information Age’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 433–51.
27.
HutchinsB.LesterL.2011, ‘Politics, Power and Online Protest in an Age of Environmental Conflict’, in CottleS.LesterL. (eds), Transnational Protests and the Media, Peter Lang, New York, pp. 159–71.
KatoK.2013, ‘As Fukushima Unfolds: Media Meltdown and Public Empowerment’, in LesterL.HutchinsB. (eds), Environmental Conflict and the Media, Peter Lang, New York, pp. 201–14.
30.
KingstonJ.2004, Japan's Quiet Transformation: Social Change and Civil Society in the Twenty-first Century, RoutledgeCurzon, New York.
31.
KraidyM.M.MurphyP.D.2008, ‘Shifting Geertz: Toward a Theory of Translocalism in Global Communication Studies’, Communication Theory, vol. 18, pp. 335–55.
32.
LesterL.2007, Giving Ground: Media and Environmental Conflict in Tasmania, Quintus, Hobart.
33.
LesterL.2010, Media and Environment: Conflict, Politics and the News, Polity Press, Cambridge.
34.
LesterL.CottleS.2009, ‘Visualizing Climate Change: Television News and Ecological Citizenship’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 3, pp. 17–26.
35.
LesterL.CottleS.2011, ‘Transnational Protests and the Media: Toward Global Civil Society’, in CottleS.LesterL. (eds), Transnational Protests and the Media, Peter Lang, New York, pp. 287–93.
36.
LesterL.HutchinsB.2009, ‘Power Games: Environmental Protest, News Media and the Internet’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 579–96.
37.
LesterL.HutchinsB.2012a, ‘Soft Journalism, Politics and Environmental Risk: An Australian Story’, Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 654–67.
38.
LesterL.HutchinsB.2012b, ‘The Power of the Unseen: Environmental Conflict, the Media and Invisibility’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 832–46.
39.
MelissenJ. (ed.) 2005, The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
40.
MurphyP.D.2011, ‘Putting the Earth into Global Media Studies’, Communication Theory, vol. 21, pp. 217–38.
41.
Nikkei Ecology2012, ‘Australian Certified Wood Products Accused of Environment Destruction: Engos Develop Boycott Campaign Against Japanese Customer Companies – SMKC, Eidai, Panasonic, Daiwa and Sekisui’, May, pp. 45–7.
