The Construction of Karen Karnak: The Multi-Author Function

Abstract

The context of this article is the changes in authorship that have occurred within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia. The mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture, compared with that of a Read/Only tradition, is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such represents new functions and attributes. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Karen Karnak and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, while concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names forms an important tool of deconstruction involving an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology in the creation of a collective multi-author pseudonym, Karen Karnak. The article ends with a discussion of the implications of multi-authorship on the concept of the body of work, ownership and copyright.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Braddock

2001, ‘Smithee's Incorporation’, in Braddock

Hock

(eds), Directed by Allen Smithee, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 143–73.

Braddock

Hock

(eds) 2001, Directed by Allen Smithee, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

DGA 2008, ‘2006–2008 Creative Rights Handbook – DGA Basic Agreement, Article 7’, www.dga.org/contracts/ba2005-finalpdfs/09-ba2005-7.pdf.

Eliot

2002, ‘Karen Eliot @ everything2.com’, http://everything2.com/title/Karen+Eliot.

Foucault

1977, ‘What is an Author?’ trans. Bouchard

, in Bouchard

(ed.), Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essay and Interviews, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 113–39.

Home

1999, ‘Multiple Name Short Entry’, www.stewarthomesociety.org/sp/eliot.htm.

Jaszi

Woodmansee

1994, ‘On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity’, in Jaszi

Woodmansee

(eds), The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 15–28.

Love

2002, Attributing Authorship: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

McLeod

2001, Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law, Peter Lang, New York.

10.

Ray

Graeff

2008, ‘Reviewing the Author-function in the Age of Wikipedia’, in Eisner

Vicinus

(eds), Originality, Imitation, and Plagiarism, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 39–47.

11.

Rose

1993, Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

12.

Saper

2001, ‘Artificial Auteurism and the Political Economy of the Allen Smithee Case’, in Braddock

Hock

(eds), Directed by Allen Smithee, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 29–50.

13.

Wiki 2002, ‘What is Wiki’, http://wiki.org/wiki.cgi?WhatIsWiki.

14.

Woodmansee

1984, ‘The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the “Author”’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 425–48.