Reports and documents from government and other organisations have existed for centuries, but in the post-war period their production increased significantly. Computers, databases, desktop publishing software and the internet have revolutionised the ways documents can be produced and disseminated, allowing individuals, groups and organisations access to a whole new world of information. The result has been an explosion in online publishing that has transformed scholarly communication. Research reports – or grey literature as they are also known – are now an essential part of many disciplines, including science and technology, health, environmental science and many areas of public policy. While access to these reports has become easier in many respects, online publishing presents many challenges as well, particularly for collecting organisations faced with the task of adapting their systems. The management of grey literature raises many issues that are still not resolved today. This article provides some background to these ongoing challenges in Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe.
AugurC.P.1998, Information Sources in Grey Literature, 4th ed., BowkerSaur, London.
7.
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access2010, Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet, OCLC, Ohio, brtf.sdsc.edu/biblio/BRTF_Final_Report.pdf.
8.
FaraceD.J.1998, ‘Foreword’, in Third International Conference on Grey Literature: Perspectives on the Design and Transfer of Scientific and Technical Information, GL 2004 Conference Proceedings, Luxembourg, 13–14 November 1997, GreyNet/TransAtlantic, Amsterdam.
9.
FaraceD.J.FrantzenJ. (eds) 2005, Sixth International Conference on Grey Literature: Work on Grey in Progress, GL 2004 Conference Proceedings, New York, 6–7 December, TextRelease, Amsterdam.
10.
FaraceD.J.SchöpfelJ. (eds) 2010, Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
11.
FeatherJ.SturgesR.P.2003, International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2nd ed., Routledge, London.
12.
HoughtonJ.SteeleC.SheehanP.2006, Research Communication Costs in Australia: Emerging Opportunities and Benefits, Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/44485.
OkoromaF.2011, ‘Towards Effective Management of Grey Literature for Higher Education, Research and National Development’, Library Review, vol. 60, pp. 789–802.
21.
OpenGrey n.d., System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe, Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique- Laboratoire CNRS, www.opengrey.eu.
22.
Pandora2005, Online Australian Publications: Selection Guidelines for Archiving and Preservation by the National Library of Australia, National Library of Australia, Canberra, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/selectionguidelines.html.
SmithJ.2009, ‘The Evidence Base: Where is It?’Australian Library Journal, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 28–38.
27.
ThomasJ.2005, ‘Between Journals and Archives: Peer Reviewing and Other Possible Futures for Academic Publishing’, Southern Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 81–88.
28.
TillettS.NewboldE.2006, ‘Grey Literature at the British Library: Revealing a Hidden Resource’, Interlending and Document Supply, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 70–73.
29.
VigenJ.2011, ‘Mixing Black and White Makes Grey: The Spectrum of Scientific Exchange Over Time’, paper presented to Grey Literature Conference 2011, Washington, 5–6 December, www.textrelease.com/gl13abstracts/openingsession.html.
