Host/Host Conversations: Analysing Moral and Social Order in Talk on Commercial Radio

Abstract

Talk between dual (or triple) host combinations dominates breakfast and drive programs. These programs are chat based, and incorporate talk on a range of topics conducted for an overhearing audience, including talkback segments that involve callers. This article considers the features of chat-based programming, and proposes a framework for analysis into talk-in-interaction on this format. Using ethnomethodological approaches – conversation and membership category analysis – as the basis for analysis, this article argues that in addition to the influence of the ‘radio program’, there are three membership category devices that influence host/host talk. These are ‘telling stories’, ‘members of a team’ and ‘members of a community’. The ways in which hosts and callers orient to these have consequences that may lead to the overt or subtle exclusion, or otherwise, of members of the overhearing audience, and this approach encourages a systematic analysis of the type of community to which participants orient within particular program.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleton

1999, ‘The Lure of Laws: An Analysis of the Audience Appeal of the John Laws Program’, Media International Australia, no. 91, pp. 67–81.

Atkinson

Moores

2003, ‘“We All Have Bad Bad Days”: Attending to Face in Broadcast Troubles-talk’, Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 129–46.

Atkinson

1988, ‘Ethnomethodology: A Critical Review’, Annual Review of Sociology, no. 14, pp. 441–65.

Bergmann

J.R.

1998, ‘Introduction: Morality in Discourse’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 31, nos 3 and 4, pp. 279–94.

Berland

1990, ‘Radio Space and Industrial Time: Music Formats, Local Narratives and Technological Mediation’, Popular Music, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 178–92.

Busch

2011, ‘The Social Orders of Family Mealtime’, PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.

Butler

Fitzgerald

Gardner

2009, ‘Branching Out: Ethnomethodological Approaches to Communication’, Australian Journal of Communication, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1–14.

Cheshire

2000, ‘The Telling or the Tale? Narratives and Gender in Adolescent Networks’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 234–62.

Cohen

A.P.

1985, The Symbolic Construction of Community, A.P. Cohen/Ellis Horwood, London.

10.

Cole

C.L.

2005, ‘Review – Paul ten Have (2004): Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 6, no. 3, Article 12, www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/38/79#g15.

11.

Cook

2001, ‘Dangerous Radio/activity: Self and Social Space in Contemporary Australian Talk Radio’, PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney.

12.

Donnellon

1996, Team Talk: The Power of Language in Team Dynamics, Harvard College, Boston.

13.

Drew

1998, ‘Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 31, nos 3 and 4, pp. 293–325.

14.

Fairclough

2001, Language and Power, 2nd ed., Longman, Harlow.

15.

Fitzgerald

1999, ‘Method in Media Interaction: An Ethnomethodological Analysis of a Radio Phone-in’, PhD thesis, University of Wales.

16.

Fitzgerald

Housley

2002, ‘Identity, Categorization and Sequential Organisation: The Sequential and Categorical Flow of Identity in a Radio Phone-in’, Discourse and Society, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 579–602.

17.

Fitzgerald

Housley

2007, ‘Talkback, Community and the Public Sphere’, Media International Australia, no. 122, pp. 150–63.

18.

Fitzgerald

Housley

Butler

2009, ‘Omnirelevance and Interactional Context’, Australian Journal of Communication, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 45–64.

19.

Garfinkel

1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

20.

Gibbs

2000, ‘Irony in Talk Among Friends’, Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 15, nos 1 and 2, pp. 5–27.

21.

Goffman

1961, Interaction Rituals, Pantheon, New York.

22.

Heritage

1984, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

23.

Higgins

Moss

1982, Sounds Real: Radio in Everyday Life, University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.

24.

Hogg

Reid

2006, ‘Social Identity, Self-categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms’, Communication Theory, vol. 16, pp. 7–30.

25.

Housley

Fitzgerald

2002, ‘The Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorisation Analysis’, Qualitative Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59–83.

26.

Housley

Fitzgerald

2009, ‘Membership Categorisation, Culture and Norms in Action’, Discourse and Society, vol. 20, pp. 345–62.

27.

Hutchby

1991, ‘The Organisation of Talk on Talk Radio’, in Scannell

(ed.), Broadcast Talk, Sage, London.

28.

Hutchby

1996a, Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

29.

Hutchby

1996b, ‘Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show’, Discourse and Society, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 481–97.

30.

Hutchby

2001, ‘“Witnessing”: The Use of First-hand Knowledge in Legitimating Lay Opinions on Talk Radio’, Discourse Studies, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 481–97.

31.

Hutchby

2006, Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting, Open University Press, Maidenhead.

32.

Hutchby

Wooffitt

1998, Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, Applications, 5th ed., Polity Press, Cambridge.

33.

Jayyusi

1984, Categorisation and the Moral Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston.

34.

Kangasharju

1996, ‘Aligning as a Team in Multiparty Conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 291–391.

35.

Korolija

1998, ‘Episodes in Talk: Constructing Coherence in Multiparty Conversation’, PhD thesis, Linköping University, Sweden.

36.

Korolija

2009, ‘Recycling Cotext: The Impact of Prior Conversation on the Emergence of Episodes in a Multiparty Radio Talk Show’, Discourse Processes, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–125.

37.

Lepper

2000, Categories in Text and Talk, Sage, London.

38.

Lerner

1992, ‘Assisted Storytelling: Deploying Shared Knowledge as a Practical Matter’, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 247–71.

39.

Lerner

2004, ‘On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 151–84.

40.

Liddicoat

2011, An Introduction to Conversation Analysis, 2nd ed., Continuum, London.

41.

Linnell

Rommetveit

1998, ‘The Many Forms and Facets of Morality in Dialogue’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 31, nos 3 and 4, pp. 465–73.

42.

Maynard

D.W.

Zimmerman

1984, ‘Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships’, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 301–16.

43.

Norrick

N.R.

1993, Conversational Joking, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

44.

O'Sullivan

2001, ‘The Illusion of Consumer Participation: The Case of Talk Radio. M/C Reviews’, www.media-culture.org.au/reviews/features/interactive/sosullivan.html.

45.

O'Sullivan

2005, ‘The Whole Nation is Listening to You: The Presentation of the Self on a Tabloid Talk Radio Show’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 719–38.

46.

Pomerantz

1998, ‘Multiple Interpretations of Context: How are They Useful?’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 123–32.

47.

Pomerantz

Atkinson

1984, ‘Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and the Study of Courtroom Interaction’, in Muller

D.J.

Blackman

D.E.

Chapman

A.J.

(eds), Topics in Psychology and the Law, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 283–94.

48.

Sacks

1995, Lectures on Conversation: Volumes 1 and 2, Blackwell, Oxford.

49.

Sacks

Schegloff

Jefferson

1974, ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation’, Language, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 696–35.

50.

Scannell

1991, ‘Introduction: The Relevance of Talk’, in Scannell

(ed.), Broadcast Talk, Sage, London, pp. 1–13.

51.

Schegloff

E.A.

1991, ‘Reflections on Talk and Social Structure’, in Boden

Zimmerman

(eds), Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 44–70.

52.

Schegloff

E.A.

2007, ‘A Tutorial on Membership Categorisation’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, pp. 462–82.

53.

Tannen

2005, Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

54.

Taylor

Cameron

1987, Analysing Conversation: Rules and Units in the Structure of Talk, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

55.

Thornborrow

2001, ‘Authenticating Talk: Building Public Identities in Audience Participant Broadcasting’, Discourse Studies, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 459–79.

56.

Thornborrow

2007, ‘Narrative, Opinion and Situated Argument in Talk Show Discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, pp. 1436–53.

57.

Tolson

1991, ‘Televised Chat and the Synthetic Personality’, in Scannell

(ed.), Broadcast Talk, Sage, London, pp. 178–200.

58.

Tolson

2006, Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.