This article investigates the way in which one particular talk radio program, Mornings with Madonna King, deploys strategies that seem to address some of the criticisms levelled at conventional news formats in their ability to engage people as citizens. The program does this by providing background information, linking news content to listeners' experience and creating an impression of efficacy. Finally, the article examines how the institutional practices of radio production and consumption constrain this democratic potential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngI.BrandJ.E.NobleG.SternbergJ.2006, Connecting Diversity: Paradoxes of Multicultural Australia, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Bond University, http://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/20.
2.
ButtnyRichard1993, Social Accountability in Communication, Sage, London.
3.
ClaymanS.HeritageJ.2002, The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4.
CouldryN.2007, ‘Communicative Entitlements and Democracy: The Future of the Digital Divide Debate’, in MansellR.AvgerouC.QuahD.SilverstoneR. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 383–403.
5.
CouldryN.LivingstoneS.MarkhamT.2007, Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention, Consumption and Public Life, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills.
ElsonS.2007, ‘A Habermasian Perspective on the Alternative Radio Program’, Social Alternatives, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 32–38.
8.
FairchildC.2006, ‘The Grinding Gears of a Neo-Liberal State: Community Radio and Local Cultural Production’, Southern Review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 61–76.
9.
FaircloughN.1995, Media Discourse, Edward Arnold, London.
10.
FaircloughN.2003, Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, Routledge, London.
11.
FitzgeraldR.JaworskiA.HousleyW.2008, ‘Generating News: Agenda Setting in Radio Broadcast News’, in BurgerMarcel (ed.), The Analysis of Language: Discourse in Media, Les Editions Nota Bene, Quebec, pp. 133–54.
12.
FlemingC.2002, The Radio Handbook, 2nd ed., Routledge, London.
13.
FlewT.2004, ‘A Medium for Mateship: Commercial Talk Radio in Australia’, in CrissellA. (ed.), More Than a Music Box: Radio Cultures and Communities in a Multi-Media World, Berghahn Books, New York, pp. 229–46.
14.
GoffmanE.1981, Forms of Talk, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
15.
HitchensL.2004, ‘Commercial Broadcasting: Preserving the Public Interest’, Federal Law Review, vol. 32, pp. 79–106.
16.
HofstetterC.R.1998, ‘Political Talk Radio, Situational Involvement, and Political Mobilization’, Social Science Quarterly, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 273–86.
17.
KingM.2005, Catalyst: The Power of the Media and the Public to Make Change, University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.
18.
LeeD.1987, ‘The Semantics of Just’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 11, pp. 79–100.
19.
LivingstoneS.2007, ‘Youthful Experts? A Critical Appraisal of Children's Emerging Internet Literacy’, in MansellR.AvgerouC.QuahD.SilverstoneR. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 494–513.
20.
PanZ.KosickiG.M.1997, ‘Talk Show Exposure as an Opinion Activity’, Political Communication, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 371–88.
21.
ScannellP.1996, Radio, Television and Modern Life: A Phenomenological Approach, Blackwell, Oxford.
22.
SternbergJ.2004, ‘Generation X and Television Current Affairs: Journalism and Youth Culture in the 1990s’, PhD thesis, University of Queensland.
23.
TolsonA.2006, Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
24.
WayneM.PetleyJ.MurrayC.HendersonL.2010, Television News, Politics and Young People: Generation Disconnected?, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills.
