Public concern about popular culture's sexualisation of women and girls is regularly voiced in the Australian media. Young women grow up against a backdrop of ‘raunch culture’ (Levy, 2005), which for some scholars represents a ‘new’ femininity (Gill, 2007), in which ‘hyper-sexual’ forms of (hetero)sexual expression are now expected of young women and girls, despite ostensibly being about choice and personal empowerment. In this article, I explore the constructions of girlhood and femininity amongst young women attending an elite, single-sex, private school in Melbourne, Australia. Elite schooling for girls is often associated with highly classed notions of (hetero)sexual modesty and propriety, epitomised in the reality television program Ladette to Lady. Here I consider how hypersexualities are configured within students' constructions of themselves and others, and I explore their relationship to classed expectations of identity for privileged girls. I examine the role that classed norms of identity play in mediating these girls' negotiations of hypersexualities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AapolaS.GonickM.HarrisA.2005, Young Femininity: Girlhood, Power and Social Change, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.
2.
AlburyK.2002, Yes Means Yes: Getting Explicit About Heterosex, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
3.
AllanA.2009, ‘The Importance of Being a “Lady”: Hyper-femininity and Heterosexuality in the Private, Single-sex Primary School’, Gender and Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 145–58.
4.
ArcherL.HalsallA.HollingworthS.2007a, ‘Class, Gender, (Hetero)sexuality and Schooling: Paradoxes Within Working-class Girls' Engagement with Education and Post-16 Aspirations’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 165–80.
5.
ArcherL.HalsallA.HollingworthS.2007b, ‘Inner-city Femininities and Education: “Race”, Class, Gender and Schooling in Young Women's Lives’, Gender and Education, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 549–68.
6.
BudgeonS.2003, Choosing a Self: Young Women and the Individualization of Identity. Praeger, Westport, CN.
7.
ButlerJ.1990, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge, New York.
8.
DelamontS.1989, Knowledgeable Women: Structuralism and the Reproduction of Elites, Routledge, London.
9.
DohertyC.2010, ‘The Appeal of the International Baccalaureate in Australia's Educational Market: A Curriculum of Choice for Mobile Futures’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 73–89.
GillR.2007, ‘Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–66.
14.
GillR.2008, ‘Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 35–60.
15.
GillR.2009, ‘Supersexualise Me! Advertising and the “Midriffs’”, in AttwoodF. (ed.), Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualisation of Western Culture, I.B. Taurus, London, pp. 153–68.
16.
GonickM.2006, ‘Between “Girl Power” and “Reviving Ophelia”: Constituting the Neoliberal Girl Subject’, NWSA Journal, vol. 18, no 2, pp. 1–23.
17.
HarrisA.2004, Future Girl: Young Women in the Twenty-First Century, Routledge, London.
18.
KearneyM.C.2006, Girls Make Media, Routledge, New York.
19.
KenwayJ.1990, ‘Privileged Girls, Private Schools and the Culture of “Success”’, in KenwayJ.WillisS. (eds), Hearts and Minds: Self-esteem and the Schooling of Girls, 6th ed., Falmer Press, New York, pp. 131–56.
20.
Ladette to Lady. 2005, ITV Television Series, United Kingdom, RDF Media producer.
21.
LeesS.1993, Sugar and Spice: Sexuality and Adolescent Girls, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
22.
LevyA.2005, Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture, Free Press, New York.
23.
LilleyC.2005, We Can Be Heroes, DVD recording, Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
24.
LilleyC.2007, Summer Heights High, DVD recording, Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
25.
McKeeA. (ed.) 2003, Textual Analysis: A Beginner's Guide, Sage, London.
26.
McRobbieA.2004, ‘Notes on “What Not to Wear” and Post-feminist Symbolic Violence’, in SkeggsB.AdkinsL. (eds), Feminism After Bourdieu, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 99–109.
27.
McRobbieA.2005, The Uses of Cultural Studies, Sage, London.
28.
McRobbieA.2007, ‘Top Girls?’Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 718–37.
29.
NayakA.KehilyM.J.2008, Gender, Youth and Culture: Young Masculinities and FemininitiesPalgrave, Houndmills.
30.
O'FlynnG.PetersenE.2007, ‘“The Good Life” and “the Rich Portfolio”: Young Women, Schooling and Neoliberal Subjectification’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 459–72.
31.
ReayD.2001, ‘“Spice Girls”, “Nice Girls”, “Girlies”, and “Tomboys”: Gender Discourses, Girls' Cultures and Femininities in the Primary Classroom’, Gender and Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 153–66.
32.
RenoldE.AllanA.2006, ‘Bright and Beautiful: High Achieving Girls, Ambivalent Femininities, and the Feminization of Success in the Primary School’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 457–73.
33.
RenoldE.RingroseJ.2008, ‘Regulation and Rupture: Mapping Tween and Teenage Girls' Resistance to the Heterosexual Matrix’, Feminist Theory, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 313–38.
34.
RingroseJ.2007, ‘Successful Girls? Complicating Post-feminist, Neoliberal Discourses of Educational Achievement and Gender Equality’, Gender and Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 471–89.
35.
RingroseJ.WalkerdineV.2008, ‘Regulating the Abject: The TV Makeover as Site of Neo-liberal Reinvention Toward Bourgeois Femininity’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 227–46.
36.
SkeggsB.1997, Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable, Sage, London.
TylerI.2008, ‘“Chav Mum Chav Scum': Class Disgust in Contemporary Britain’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–34.
41.
WalkerdineV.LuceyH.MelodyJ.2001, Growing Up Girl: Psychosocial Explorations of Gender and Class, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
42.
WalkerdineV.RingroseJ.2006, ‘Femininities: Reclassifying Upward Mobility and the Neoliberal Subject’, in SkeltonC.FrancisB.SmulyanL. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Gender and Education, Sage, London, pp. 31–46.
