Internet media have come under increasing examination since the early 1990s within a number of theoretical frameworks, including their use and potential influence in the public sphere of political discourse. Increasing use of internet media was identified in the 2000 and 2004 US presidential elections, with the latter being described as ‘a critical turning point’. However, the development of what some call ‘new media’ or ‘social media’ based on Web 2.0 internet technology has overtaken many findings of previous research. Some of the most popular Web 2.0-based media currently in use were developed after 2004. These technological changes, coinciding with declining television viewing and newspaper readership, suggest that new forms of internet media need ongoing critical review. This paper analyses findings from a study of internet media use in the 2007 Australian federal election and explores their implications in relation to the public sphere.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
‘A ringing endorsement’2007, The Australian, 25 October, p. 32.
2.
Australian Centre for Public Communication2008, E-Electioneering: Use of New Media in the 2007 Australian Federal Election, research report, University of Technology Sydney, January.
3.
Australian Communications and Media Authority2007, Media and Communications in Australian Families 2007: Report of the Media and Society Research Project, ACMA, Canberra, January.
4.
BentivegnaS.2002, ‘Politics and New Media’, in LievrouwL.LivingstoneS. (eds), The Handbook of New Media, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 50–61.
5.
BuckinghamD.2000, The Making of Citizens: Young People, News and Politics, Routledge, London.
6.
CornerJ.2007, ‘Media, Power and Political Culture’, in DevereauxE. (ed.), Media Studies: Key Issues and Debates, Sage, London, pp. 211–30.
7.
CurranJ.2002, Media and Power, Routledge, London.
8.
FallowsJ.2000, ‘Internet Illusions’, New York Times Book Review, 16 November, pp. 28–31.
9.
FlewT.2005, New Media: An Introduction, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
10.
FlewT.2008, New Media: An Introduction, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
11.
FoucaultM.1980, ‘The History of Sexuality: An Interview’, Oxford Literary Review, no. 4, p. 1.
12.
FoucaultM.1998, The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality, Vol 1, The Care of the Self, trans. HurleyR., Penguin, London.
13.
FountainN.1988, Underground: The London Alternative Press 1966–74, Commedia/Routledge, London.
14.
GarnhamN.1992, ‘The Media and the Public Sphere’, in CalhounC. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15.
GreenJ.1999, All Dressed Up: The Sixties and the CounterCulture, Pimlico, London.
16.
GitlinT.1998, ‘Public Spheres or Public Sphericles?’ in LiebesT.CurranJ. (eds), Media, Ritual and Identity, Routledge, New York.
17.
GoodeL.2005, Jurgen Habermas: Democracy and the Public Sphere, Pluto Press, London.
18.
GrossbergL.WartellaE.WhitneyD.WiseM.2006, Media Making: Mass Media in a Popular Culture, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19.
HabermasJ.1989 [1962], The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
20.
HabermasJ.2006, ‘Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’, Communication Theory, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 411–26.
21.
HillK.HughesJ.1998, Cyperpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet, Rowman and Littlefield, New York.
22.
HowleyK.2007, ‘Community Media and the Public Sphere’, in DevereauxE. (ed.), Media Studies: Key Issues and Debates, Sage, London, pp. 342–60.
23.
JenkinsH.2006, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York University Press, New York.
24.
JonesS. (ed.) 1995, Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25.
JonesS. (ed.) 1998, Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26.
KatzE.BlumlerJ.GurevitchM.1973, ‘Uses and Gratifications Research’, Public Opinion Quarterly, no. 37, pp. 509–23.
27.
KatzE.BlumlerJ.GurevitchM.1974, ‘Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual’, in BlumlerJ.KatzE. (eds), The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 19–32.
28.
LévyP.1997, Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World of Cyberspace, Perseus, Cambridge, MA.
29.
LivingstoneS.1999, ‘New Media, New Audiences’, New Media & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–66.
30.
LievrouwL.LivingstoneS. (eds) 2002, The Handbook of New Media, Sage, London.
31.
FoundationMarkle1997, The State of 'Electronically Enhanced Democracy: A Survey of the Internet, October.
32.
McChesneyR.1996, ‘The Internet and US Communication Policy-Making in Historical and Critical Perspective’, Journal of Communication, no. 46, pp. 98–124.
33.
McChesneyR.2000, Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times, rev. ed., New Press, New York.
34.
MonitorsMedia2008, ‘E-Election Media Analysis Report’, January, Sydney.
35.
MunchE.1893, The Scream, oil paining on cardboard, National Gallery, Oslo, Norway.
36.
NeumanW.1991, The Future of the Mass Audience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37.
NightingaleV.DwyerT. (eds) 2007, New Media Worlds: Challenges for Convergence, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
de Sola PoolI.1983, Technologies of Freedom, Belknap, Cambridge, MA.
41.
PosterM.1997, ‘Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere’, in PorterD. (ed.), Internet Culture, Routledge, New York.
42.
PosterM.2006, ‘Culture and Media: Introduction’, in LievrouwL.LivingstoneS. (eds), The Handbook of New Media, Sage, London, pp. 479–84.
43.
PriorM.2005, ‘News vs Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout’, American Journal of Political Science, no. 49, pp. 577–92.
44.
PutnamR.1995, ‘Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 65–78.
45.
PutnamR.2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of America Community, Simon & Schuster, New York.
46.
RheingoldH.1993, The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
47.
Roy Morgan Research2007, Newspaper Readership Survey data for the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.
SchneiderS.1996, ‘A Case Study of Abortion: Conversation on the Internet’, Social Science Computer Review, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 373–93.
50.
SchneiderS.1997, Expanding the Public Sphere Through Computer-Mediated Communication: Political Discussion About Abortion in a Usenet Newsgroup, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, www.sunyit.edu/steve
51.
SchudsonM.2003, ‘Click Here for Democracy: A History and Critique of an Information-Based Model of Citizenship’, in JenkinsH.ThorburnD. (eds), Democracy and New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
52.
SeverinW.TankardJ.2001, Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media, Addison Wesley Longman, New York.
53.
ShahD.KwakN.HolbertR.2001, ‘Connecting and Disconnecting with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’, Political Communication, no. 18, pp. 141–62.
54.
ShapiroA.LeoneR.1999, The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know, Public Affairs Century Foundation, New York.
55.
SparksG.2006, Media Effects Research: A Basic Overview, 2nd ed., Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
56.
StreetJ.2001, Mass Media, Politics and Democracy, Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK.
57.
‘The YouTube Election’2007, Sydney Morning Herald, 14 July, p. 23.
58.
Van ZoonenL.1998a, ‘A Day at the Zoo: Political Communication, Pigs and Popular Culture’, Media, Culture and Society, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 183–200.
59.
Van ZoonenL.1998b, ‘“Finally I Have My Mother Back”: Politicians and Their Families in Popular Culture’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48–64.
60.
WarnerM.2002, Publics and Counterpublics, Zone Books, New York.
61.
WellmanB.2000, ‘Physical Place and Cyberspace: The Rise of Networked Individualism’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, December.
XenosM.MoyP.2007, ‘Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement’, Journal of Communication, vol. 57, no. 4, December, pp. 704–18.
64.
Young Voters Caught Hook, Line and Sinker2007, Sydney Morning Herald, World, 23–24 June, p. 21.
