Popular portrayals of ubiquitous computing tend to downplay the surveillance implications of emerging forms of mobile, networked interactivity. This essay seeks to supplement such accounts with a critical analysis of the emergence of digital enclosures that limit access to interactive networks and services to those who ‘freely’ submit to increasingly comprehensive forms of monitoring. If land enclosure helped produce the spatial conditions for the exploitation of wage labor, digital enclosures enable the exploitation of information generated by users as they go about their daily lives. Describing interactive networks, in both virtual and physical spaces, as forms of spatial enclosure helps to supplement privacy-based critiques of surveillance with questions about the ownership and control of data collected within the enclosure.
BardAlexanderSöderqvistJan2002, Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism, Pearson Education, London.
3.
BenjaminWalter1999, The Arcades Project, trans. EilandHowardMcLaughlinKevin, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
4.
BenklerYochai2006, The Wealth of Networks, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
5.
BondPaula2003, ‘ID Tags Make Products Talk’, The Atlanta Journal Constitution, 29 July, sec. A, p. 1.
6.
BoyleJames2001, ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’, paper presented to the Conference on the Public Domain, Duke Law School, Durham, North Carolina, 9–11 November. www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers/boyle.pdf.
7.
De AngelisMassimo1998, ‘Marx and Primitive Accumulation: The Continuous Character of Capital's Enclosures’, The Commoner Web Journal, no. 2, www.commoner.org.uk.
8.
DresserMichael2005, ‘Cell Phone Data Tracing Traffic in MD: System “Watches” Vehicles, Raises Fears About Privacy’, The Baltimore Sun, 18 November, sec A, p. 1.
9.
DysonEsther1996, ‘Cyberspace and the American Dream: A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age’, The Information Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 295–308.
10.
GatesBill1996, The Road Ahead, Penguin, New York.
11.
HardenBlaine2006, ‘Tech Companies Lured by Cheap Energy; Microsoft, Yahoo Have Plans to Build Servers Fueled by Washington Dams’, The Houston Chronicle, 9 July, sec. A, p. 3.
12.
HoffmanWilliam2006, ‘Strong Signal: Motorola's Purchase of Symbol has Big Implications for Supply-Chain Management’, Journal of Commerce, 9 October, p. 28.
JenkinsHenry2004, ‘The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–43.
15.
JenkinsHenry2006a, Convergence Culture, NYU Press, New York City.
16.
JenkinsHenry2006b, ‘Democracy, Big Brother Style,’, Confessions of an Aca/Fan: The Official Weblog of Henry Jenkins, www.henryjenkins.org.
17.
KazanjianDavid2002, ‘Mercantile Exchanges, Mercantilist Enclosures: Racial Capitalism in the Black Mariner Narratives of Venture Smith and John Jea’, The New Centennial Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 147–78.
18.
KopytoffVerne2006, ‘WiFi Plan Stirs Big Brother Concerns; Log-On Rule Would Allow Google to Track Users' Whereabouts in S.F,’, The San Francisco Chronicle, 8, April, p. C1.
19.
LehmannUlrich2002, Tigersprung: Fashion in Modernity, MIT Press Cambridge, MA.
20.
LessigLawrence, 2000, Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, New York.
21.
LessigLawrence, 2001, The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, Random House, New York.
22.
LessigLawrence, 2004, Free Culture, Penguin, New York.
23.
MarkoffJohnHansellSaul2006, ‘Hiding in Plain Sight, Google Seeks an Expansion of Power’, The New York Times, 14 June, p. 1.
24.
MarxKarl1992, Capital Volume 1: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production, International Publishers, New York.
