This paper positions current Australian discussions about practice-led research within international, national, historical and policy contexts and relates them to the developing pedagogical debate around performing and creative arts doctorates. Arguing that the creative industries offer benefits across the economy, it suggests that recognition for the research methodology specific to practice-led disciplines and the creative industries is overdue. The discussions in this paper, and in this theme issue of MIA, are all the more critical as a result of their articulation with the imminent introduction of the Research Quality Framework (RQF), which will allow nuanced, rigorous and internationally benchmarked evaluation of the quality and impact of research outputs. The RQF and the proposed research assessment panel for ‘creative arts, design and built environment’ herald the way for wider acceptance of practice-led outputs in the Australian research environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AARE2003, Defining the Creative Arts Doctorate, AARE mini-conference, Newcastle University, 2–4 October, Australian Association for Research in Education, www.aare.edu.au/conf03nc
2.
AHRC n.d., Arts and Humanities Research Council, UK Government: Department of Employment and Learning (DEL) et al., www.ahrb.ac.uk
AUQA2006, Australian Universities Quality Agency, Good Practice Database, Creative and Performing Arts Index, ECU, Ministerial Council on Education, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA): AUQAwww.auqa.edu.au/gp/search/detail.php?gp_id=2054
5.
BAA2004, Backing Australia's Ability — Building Our Future through Science and Innovation, Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Education, Science and Training, http://backingaus.innovation.gov.au
6.
CHASS2004, Council for the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, CHASS, www.chass.org.au/website
PicciniA.2002, An Historiographic Perspective on Practice as Research, Practice as Research in Performance (PARIP), Bristol, www.bris.ac.uk/parip/t_ap.htm
19.
RAE2001, UoA [Unit of Assessment] 66 — Drama, Dance and Performing Arts — Overview Report, UK Government, Department of Employment and Learning (DEL) et al., www.hero.ac.uk/rae/overview/docs/UoA66.pdf
20.
RichardsA.1995, Performance as Research/Research by Means of Performance: A Discussion Paper, Australasian Drama Studies Association/Performance as Research Subcommittee, Armidale, July, http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/adsa/paper.html
21.
RifkinJ.2000, The Age of Access: How the Shift from Ownership to Access is Transforming Modern Life, Penguin, London.
WisslerR.1998, ‘Benchmarks, Interpretation and Peers — Judging Performance as Research’, Proceedings of the National Symposium on Research in the Performing Arts, University of Melbourne.
27.
WisslerR.HasemanB.WallaceS-A.KeaneM.2004, Innovation in Australian Arts, Media and Design: Fresh Challenges for the Tertiary Sector, Flaxton, Qld: Post Pressed.
