Australia's media policy agenda has recently been dominated by debate over two key issues: media ownership reform, and the local content provisions of the Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement. Challenging the tendency to analyse these issues separately, the article considers them as interlinked indicators of fundamental shifts occurring in the digital media environment. Converged media corporations increasingly seek to achieve economies of scale through ‘content streaming’: multi-purposing proprietary content across numerous digitally enabled platforms. This has resulted in rivalries for control of delivery technologies (as witnessed in media ownership debates) as well as over market access for corporate content (in the case of local content debates). The article contextualises Australia's contemporary media policy flashpoints within international developments and longer-term industry strategising. It further questions the power of media policy as it is currently conceived to deal adequately with the challenges raised by a converging digital media marketplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbarranAlan B.DimmickJohn1996, ‘Concentration and Economies of Multiformity in the Communication Industries’, Journal of Media Economics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 41–50.
CrayfordPeter2002, ‘The Revolt on Planet Hollywood’, Australian Financial Review, 13 July, p. 45.
12.
CryleDenis1998, ‘Niche Markets or Monopolies? Regional Media, Government Policy and the Cross-Media Review’, Media International Australia, no. 88, pp. 79–88.
13.
CunninghamStuart1994, ‘Diversity: Rhetoric & Reality’, in SchultzJ. (ed.), Not Just Another Business: Journalists, Citizens and the Media, Pluto Press and National Centre for Australian Studies, Sydney and Melbourne, pp. 115–30.
14.
CunninghamStuartFlewTerry2002, ‘Policy’, in CunninghamS.TurnerG. (eds), The Media & Communications in Australia, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 48–61.
15.
DayMark2002a, ‘Media Policy Stumbles Towards the Light’, Australian, Media, 2 May, p. 6.
16.
DayMark2002b, ‘Red Tape Strangles Media Market’, Australian, Media, 14 November, p. 6.
17.
DayMark2003, ‘Media Players Eye Up New Suitors While Alston Woos Hard-to-get Independents’, Australian, Media, 3 April, p. 3.
18.
DayMark2004, ‘Parties Share Their Broadcast Policies’, Australian, Media, 2 September, pp. 17, 20.
19.
DayMark2005, ‘Media Braces for a Bumpy Ride’, Australian, 27 January, p. 13.
20.
DoyleGillian2000, ‘The Economics of Monomedia and Cross-Media Expansion: A Study of the Case Favouring Deregulation of TV and Newspaper Ownership in the UK’, Journal of Cultural Economics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–26.
21.
DoyleGillian2002, Media Ownership: The Economics and Politics of Convergence and Concentration in the UK and European Media, Sage, London.
22.
ElliottGeoffSchulzeJane2004, ‘Adelaide Gives Murdoch Another Victory: Delaware’, Australian, 27 October, p. 1.
23.
Entertainment Industry Coalition for Free Trade2004, ‘Entertainment Industry Coalition for Free Trade Hails US–Australia Free Trade Agreement’, American–Australian Free Trade Agreement Coalition, 11 February, www.aaftac.org/eic.htm
24.
FlewTerry1995, ‘Images of Nation: Economic and Cultural Aspects of Australian Content Regulations for Commercial Television’, in CraikJ.BaileyJ. JamesMoranA. (eds), Public Voices, Private Interests: Australia's Media Policy, Australian Cultural Studies series, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 73–85.
GivenJock2003, America's Pie: Trade and Culture After 9/11, Screen Industry, Culture and Policy Research series, UNSW Press, Sydney.
29.
GoldsmithBenSpurgeonChristina (eds) 2004, ‘Culture, Trade, Services’, themed issue of Media International Australia incorporating Culture & Policy, no. 111, May.
30.
GoldsmithBenThomasJulianO'ReganTomCunninghamStuart2002, ‘Asserting Cultural and Social Regulatory Principles in Converging Media Systems’, in RaboyMarc (ed.), Global Media Policy in the New Millennium, University of Luton Press, Luton, pp. 93–109.
John Fairfax Holdings Limited2002, ‘Submission to the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Legislation Committee on the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2002’, Parliament of Australia, 19 Apr. www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/ecita_ctte/media_ownership/submissions/sublist.htm
39.
LewisKieran2002, ‘Deliberating on Diversity: Australia's Print Media Inquiry and the Productivity Commission's Inquiry into Broadcasting’, Australian Journal of Communication, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 31–42.
40.
ManiatyTony2003, ‘That's Not Entertainment’, Australian, 16 August, p. 25.
McIlveenLuke2003, ‘The Cross Media Crash’, Australian, Media, 26 June, pp. 4–5.
43.
Motion Picture Association of America2004, ‘MPAA Statement on the US–Australia Free Trade Agreement’, Motion Picture Association of America, 9 February, www.mpaa.org/legislation/press/2004/2004_02_09.htm
44.
MurraySimone2002, ‘Harry Potter, Inc.: Content Recycling for Corporate Synergy’, M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, ‘Loop’ issue, vol. 5, no. 4, www.media-culture.org.au/mc/0208/recycling.html
45.
MurraySimone2003, ‘Media Convergence's Third Wave: Content Streaming’, Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 9, no. 1 (Spring), pp. 8–18.
46.
MurraySimone2004, ‘“Celebrating the Story the Way It Is”: Cultural Studies, Corporate Media and the Contested Utility of Fandom’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7–25.
47.
NegroponteNicholas1995, Being Digital, Coronet, London.
News Limited1999, ‘A Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into Australia's Broadcasting Legislation’, Productivity Commission, May, www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/broadcst/subs/sublist.html
Publishing and Broadcasting Limited1999, ‘Submission to the Review of Broadcasting Regulation by the Productivity Commission’, Productivity Commission, May, www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/broadcst/subs/sublist.html
57.
Publishing and Broadcasting Limited2002) ‘Submission to the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Legislation Committee on the Inquiry into the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2002’, Parliament of Australia, April, www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/ecita_ctte/media_ownership/submissions/sublist.htm
58.
RaboyMarc (ed.) 2002, Global Media Policy in the New Millennium, University of Luton Press, Luton.
59.
RiesIvor2001, ‘High Stakes’, Bulletin, 11 December, pp. 67–69.
60.
SainsburyMichael2005, ‘Extra Bang for Media Changes’, Australian, 2 February, p. 2.
Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Legislation Committee2002, ‘Report on the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2002’, Parliament of Australia, 18 June, www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/ecita_ctte/reports/index.htm
63.
Senate Select Committee on the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and the United States of America. 2004, ‘Final Report on the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and the United States of America’, Parliament of Australia, 5 August, www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/freetrade_ctte/report/final/index.htm
64.
SchultzJulianne2000, ‘Media Abundance in the Digital Age’, in NajmanJ.M.WesternJ.S. (eds), A Sociology of Australian Society, 3rd edn, Macmillan, Melbourne, pp. 429–50.
65.
SimonsMargaret2005, ‘Crikey Sells Out’, Age, Insight, 5 February, p. 3.
ThomasJulian2000, ‘It's Later than You Think: The Productivity Commission's Broadcasting Inquiry and Beyond’, Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, no. 95, pp. 9–18.
68.
TuohyWendy2003, ‘US Talks Threaten Film, TV Industry’, Sunday Age, 1 June, p. 4.
