If news is a fundamental part of the public sphere and ideals of democracy, then continuing assertions about the public's lack of engagement with its topics is a worrying trend. However, much of this worry may be conflated by a lack of understanding about both the lived experiences of audiences (particularly youth audiences) and the news media environment more generally. This paper examines The Panel, a Ten Network ‘new’ news program which appears to have a significant deal of power in the mediatised postmodern public sphere. Through its discursive format, and by making news more comprehensible and interesting, the program is able to increase the potential for everyday ‘rational-critical’ debate at the heart of the public sphere (Habermas, 1989: 117). This theory is examined here through the use of interviews with members of The Panel's production team and focus groups conducted with youth audiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongM.LindsayD.WattersonR.1995, Media Law in Australia, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
2.
BuckinghamD.2000, The Making of Citizens: Young People, News and Politics, Routledge, London.
3.
CarpignanoP.AndersenR.AronowitzS.DiFazioW.1993, ‘Chatter in the Age of Electronic Reproduction: Talk Television and the “Public Mind”’, in, RobbinsB. (ed.), The Phantom Public Sphere, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 93–120.
4.
CliftonB.2000, ‘Panel “More Than Just Jokes”’, Daily Telegraph, 16 November, p. 18.
5.
ConnellI.1991, ‘Tales of Tellyland: The Popular Press and Television in the UK’, in, DahlgrenP.SparksC. (eds), Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere in the New Media Age, Routledge, London, pp. 236–53.
6.
CottleS.2001, ‘Television News and Citizenship: Packaging the Public Sphere’, in BromleyM. (ed.), No News Is Bad News: Radio, Television and the Public, Pearson Education, Harlow, pp. 61–79.
7.
CriglerA.N.JensenK.B.1991, ‘Discourses on Politics: Talking About Public Issues in the United States and Denmark’, in DahlgrenP.SparksC. (eds), Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere in the New Media Age, Routledge, London, pp. 176–93.
8.
CurranJ.1996, ‘Mass Media and Democracy: A Reappraisal’, in CurranJ.GurevitchM. (eds), Mass Media and Society, St Martins Press, New York, pp. 82–117.
9.
DahlgrenP.1992, ‘Journalism as Popular Culture: Introduction’, in DahlgrenP.SparksC. (eds), Journalism and Popular Culture, Sage, London, pp. 1–23.
10.
DahlgrenP.1995, Television and the Public Sphere, Sage, London.
11.
EvansV.SternbergJ.2000, ‘Young People, Politics and Television Current Affairs in Australia’, Journal of Australian Studies, no. 63, pp. 103–09, 195–97.
12.
FidgeonR.2003, ‘All Talk and No Ratings Action’, Herald-Sun, 9 August, p. 16.
13.
FiskeJ.1987, Television Culture, Routledge, London.
14.
FiskeJ.1989a, Reading the Popular, Hyman, Boston.
15.
FiskeJ.1989b, Understanding Popular Culture, Routledge, London.
16.
GleisnerT.SitchR.2004, Personal interview with author, Melbourne, 2 September.
17.
GreenJ.2001, ‘More Than TV: Channel Ten and Diversity in Free-to-Air Broadcasting’, Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, no. 100, pp. 49–64.
18.
GripsrudJ.1999, ‘Scholars, Journalism, Television’, in GripsrudJ. (ed.), Television and Common Knowledge, Routledge, London, pp. 34–54.
19.
HabermasJ.1989, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Polity Press, London.
20.
HallinD.C.1994, We Keep America on Top of the World: Television Journalism and the Public Sphere, Routledge, London.
21.
HarrisT.2001, ‘Panel is Laughing’, Australian, 21 February, p. 6.
HirshM.2004, Personal interview with author, Melbourne, 2 September.
24.
HollandP.1997, The Television Handbook, Routledge, London.
25.
JacksonS.2003, ‘Nine, Ten Return to Court in Panel Battle’, Australian, 4 September, p. B03.
26.
KatzJ.1992, ‘Rock, Rap and Movies Bring You the News’, Rolling Stone, no. 625, 5 March, p. 33.
27.
KovachB.RosenstielT.2001, The Elements of Journalism, Three Rivers Press, New York.
28.
LewisJ.1991, The Ideological Octopus: An Exploration of Television and Its Audience, Routledge, New York.
29.
LivingstoneS.M.LuntP.K.1994, Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate, Routledge, London.
30.
LumbyC.1999a, Gotcha: Life in a Tabloid World, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
31.
LumbyC.1999b, ‘Media Culpa: Tabloid Media, Democracy, and the Public Sphere’, paper presented to The Sydney Papers, The Sydney Institute, 28 June.
32.
LumbyC.O'NeilJ.1994, ‘Tabloid Television’, in SchultzJ. (ed.), Not Just Another Business: Journalists, Citizens and the Media, Pluto Press, Sydney, pp. 149–66.
33.
MachinD.PapatheoderouF.2002, ‘Commercialization and Tabloid Television in Southern Europe: Disintegration or Democratization of the Public Sphere?’Journal of European Area Studies, vol. X, no. 1, pp. 31–48.
34.
McGirrM.1999, ‘Behind The Panel’, Australian Catholics, Summer, pp. 14–15.
35.
McGuireM.2001, ‘Panel Should See It's Beaten’, Australian, ‘Media’, 31 May.
36.
McIlveenL.2000, ‘Don't Laugh — The Panel is All Bad News for Nine’, Australian, 2 March, p. 3.
37.
McKeeA.2001, Australian Television: A Genealogy of Great Moments, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
38.
McKeeA.2005, The Public Sphere: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.
39.
MorleyD.1999, ‘Finding Out About the World from Television News’, in GripsrudJ. (ed.), Television and Common Knowledge, Routledge, London, pp. 136–58.
40.
Noelle-NeumannE.1974, ‘The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion’, Journal of Communication, vol. XXIV, no. 2, pp. 43–51.
41.
O'LoughlinT.2004, ‘Ten Cleared by Courts’, Australian Financial Review, 12 March, p. 13.
42.
O'ShaughnessyM.1990, ‘Box Pop: Popular Television and Hegemony’, in GoodwinA.WhannelG. (eds), Understanding Television, Routledge, London, pp. 88–102.
43.
RossN.2004, ‘Nine Bitten by Rival Dog’, Herald-Sun, 12 March, p. 9.
ShearerH.2004, Personal interview with author, Melbourne, 2 September.
46.
SternbergJ.1995, ‘Signs of The Times: Television Current Affairs as “Meaning and Pleasure”’, Metro, no. 101, pp. 43–54.
47.
SternbergJ.2002, ‘Youth Media’, in CunninghamS.TurnerG. (eds), The Media and Communications in Australia, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 304–19.
48.
SternbergJ.2004, Generation X and Television Current Affairs, PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
49.
StockbridgeS.2000, ‘The Strategies of Audience Capture: The Case of Network Ten’, in TurnerG.CunninghamS. (eds), The Australian TV Book, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 190–200.
50.
TurnerG.1999, ‘Tabloidization, Journalism and the Possibility of Critique’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. II, no. 1, pp. 59–76.
51.
TurnerG.2000, ‘Television News and Current Affairs: “Welcome to Frontline”’, in TurnerG.CunninghamS. (eds), The Australian TV Book, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 89–102.
52.
WinchS.P.1997, Mapping the Cultural Space of Journalism: How Journalists Distinguish News from Entertainment, Praeger, Westport.
