This article explores racism within Australian women's magazines. By centring the analysis around a selection of mainstream magazines during a single calendar month, I endeavour to illustrate the extent to which racism is embedded within both the advertising and the editorial content. Of particular interest is the practice of skin-whitening, whereby a combination of makeup, studio lighting and airbrushing techniques render the model's skin a lighter shade. As I demonstrate, it is a practice commonly employed in the marketing of magazines and beauty products, presumably because white skin is a more acceptable (and therefore more saleable) commodity. Using white skin as its theme, the paper is couched within a discussion centring around the languages of whiteness and racism, and their intersection with the modern portrayal of beauty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieN.HillS.TurnerB.S.1988, Dictionary of Sociology, 2nd edn, Penguin, London.
2.
AsanteM.K.1998, ‘Identifying Racist Language: Linguistic Acts and Signs’, in HechtM.L. (ed.), Communicating Prejudice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3.
BrownS.2003, ‘Fair Game: Does Resisting an Island Tan and Staying Pale — Really Pale — in Summer, Break the Rules of Fashion?’Vogue Australia, October, FCP Magazines, Sydney.
4.
DelgadoR. (ed.) 1995, Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
5.
DyerR.1997, White, Routledge, London.
6.
EhrenbergA.BarnardN.KennedyR.BloomH.2002, ‘Brand Advertising as Creative Publicity’, Journal of Advertising Research (online), vol. 42, no. 4, July–August, pp. 7–18.
7.
GirouxH.A.2000, Stealing Innocence: Corporate Culture's War on Children, Palgrave, New York.
8.
HarrisonK.2003, ‘Television Viewers’ Ideal Body Proportions: The Case of the Curvaceously Thin Woman’, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research (online), March, pp. 255–65.
MartinJ.N.KrizekR.L.NakayamaT.K.BradfordL.1999, ‘What Do White People Want to Be Called? A Study of Self Labels for White Americans’, in NakayamaT.K.MartinJ.N. (eds), Whiteness: The Communication of Social Identity, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
11.
McCrackenE.1993, Decoding Women's Magazines: From Mademoiselle to Ms, Macmillan, London.
12.
MontaguA.1974, Man's Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race, 5th edn, Oxford University Press, London.
13.
MooreM.2002, Stupid White Men … and Other Sorry Excuses for the State of the Nation, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
14.
MoseleyC.1999, ‘Whiteness in Historical Perspective: Course Shows How Race is More than Skin Color and “Whiteness” Itself is a Constantly Evolving Social Construct’, Princeton Weekly Bulletin, 2 April.
15.
NakayamaT.K.MartinJ.N. (eds) 1999, Whiteness: The Communication of Social Identity, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
16.
NayakA.1997, ‘Frozen Bodies: Disclosing Whiteness in Haagen-Daas Advertising’, Body & Society, vol. 3, no. 3.
17.
PattynamaP.1995, ‘Strangers and Double Self-consciousness: Feminism and Black Studies’, in BuikemaR.SmelikA. (eds), Women's Studies and Culture: A Feminist Introduction, Zed Books, London.
18.
PerryK.1995, ‘Review: White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness’, Feminist Review, no. 49, Spring.
19.
SingerS.2003, ‘Faces of Change: Liya Kebede and Natalia Vodianova are Fashion's New Superstars — Challenging the Beauty Standard and Winning the World's Most Coveted Cosmetics Contracts’, Vogue Australia, October, FCP Magazines, Sydney.
20.
StrattonJ.1999, ‘Multiculturalism and the Whitening Machine, or How Australians Become White’, in HageG.CouchR. (eds), The Future of Australian Multiculturalism, Research Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sydney.
SweeneyD.2004, ‘Whiteness Sells’, conference paper presented at The Body Politic: Racialised Political Cultures in Australia, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 24–26 November.
23.
TebbelC.2000, The Body Snatchers: How the Media Shapes Women, Finch Publishing, Sydney.
24.
WanderP.C.MartinJ.N.NakayamaT.K.1999, ‘Whiteness and Beyond: Sociohistorical Foundations of Whiteness and Contemporary Challenges’, in NakayamaT.K.MartinJ.N. (eds), Whiteness: The Communication of Social Identity, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25.
WilesC.R.WilesJ.A.TjernlundA.1996, ‘The Ideology of Advertising: The United States and Sweden’, Journal of Advertising Research (online), vol. 36, no. 3, May–June, pp. 57–67.
26.
WolfN.1991, The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women, Vintage, London.
