There is much to be learnt if we situate the study of computer games in a broader ‘ecology’, combining media ecologies with sensory, political and other ecologies in a ‘transdisciplinary metamethodology’ (Genosko, 2003). This methodology enables a better understanding of both games themselves and of what games can tell us more generally about our new hyper-mediated lives. The paper departs from Félix Guattari's concept of ‘three ecologies’ (here taken to include the technical aspects) of self, socius and environment. Sketches are drawn from recent research into computer games that allows for the diverse, often experimental, ecological niches of games. The first is a sketch of games’ historical contexts, crucially the concurrent rise of capital, aesthetics as a problem of judgment, and industrial technics. Further sketches are of games’ activation of ‘relational histories’ (Harley, 1996: 108), the dizziness of their mediations, and what Guattari called a ‘transdisciplinary metamethodology’ as a response to games’ vertiginous mediations.
AngIen1996, Living Room Wars: Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World, Routledge, London.
4.
BolterJay DavidGrusinRichard1999, Remediations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5.
CailloisRoger1984, ‘Mimicry and Legendary Psychasthenia’, October, no. XXXI, pp. 17–32.
6.
CassellJustineJenkinsHenry (eds) 1998, From Barbie® to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7.
CastellsManuel2000, The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn, Blackwell, Oxford.
8.
CoyleRebecca1993, ‘The Genesis of Virtual Reality’, in HaywardP.WollenT. (eds), Future Visions: New Technologies of the Screen, British Film Institute, London, pp. 146–65.
GenoskoGary2003, ‘Félix Guattari: Towards a Transdisciplinary Metamethodology’, Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, vol. VIII, no. 1, pp. 129–40.
19.
GrusinRichardBolterJay David1999, Remediations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20.
GuattariFélix1995, ‘On Machines’, Journal of Philosophy and the Visual Arts, vol. VI, no. 8, pp. 8–12.
21.
GuattariFélix2000, the three ecologies, Athlone, London.
22.
HarleyRoss1996, ‘That's Interaction!: Audience Participation in Entertainment Monopolies’, Convergence, vol. II, no. 1, pp. 103–23.
23.
HarleyRoss2000, ‘Roller Coaster Planet: Kinetic Experience in the Age of Mechanical Transportation’, Convergence, vol. VI, no. 2.
24.
HaylesN. Katherine1999, how we became posthuman, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
JuulJesper2002, ‘Time to Play: An Examination of Game Temporality’, in Wardrip-FruinN.HarriganP. (eds), New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32.
JuulJesper2003, ‘Just What Is It that Makes Computer Games So Different, So Appealing?’, The Ivory Tower, DiGRA, www.digra.org
33.
LaurelBrenda1993, Computers as Theatre, Addison-Wesley, Boston.
34.
LévyPierre2001, Cyberculture, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
35.
LuhmannNiklas2000, The Reality of the Mass Media, trans. CrossKathleen, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
36.
LyotardJean-François1984, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. MassumiBrian, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
37.
MackenzieAdrian2002, Transductions: Bodies and Machines at Speed, Continuum, London.
38.
ManninenTony2003‘Interaction Forms and Communicative Actions in Multiplayer Games’, Games Studies, vol. III, no. 1, www.gamestudies.org/0301/manninen
39.
ManovichLev2002, The Language of New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
StieglerBernard1998, Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus, trans. BeardsworthRichardCollinsGeorge, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
48.
TurkleSherry1984, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet, Simon and Schuster, New York.
49.
UlmerGregory2003, Internet Invention: From Literacy to Electracy, Longman, New York.
50.
ZimmermanEric2003, ‘The Missing Piece’, statement on the conference program for the ‘Plaything’ symposium, organised by dLux media|arts, Sydney University, 10–12 October.
