The paper draws upon recent research investigating news frames, and risk theory to analyse Australian national news coverage of illegal drugs. Recent research has elaborated how risks are socially defined and acted upon, especially given changing media representations of risks. Public understandings of the risks associated with illegal drug use, policing and policies develop through the continuing and often changing representations of these risks in the media, as well as through other social practices. This paper questions the role of some prominent newspapers in setting alarmist and sensational frames to define risk in this context, and demonstrates how journalism can heighten community fear.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ.1995, Risk, UCL Press, London
2.
AltheideD.1997, ‘The News Media, the Problem, Frame, and the Production of Fear’, The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 647–69
3.
BeckU.1992, The Risk Society, Sage, London
4.
BellP.1985, ‘Drugs and the Media’, Australian Alcohol/Drug Review, no. 4, pp. 235–42
5.
BissellP.WardP.NoyceP.2001, ‘The Dependent Consumer: Reflections on Accounts of the Risks of Non-prescription Medicines’, Health, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5–30
6.
BloodR.W.PutnisP.PirkisJ.2002, ‘Mental-illness News as Violence: A News Frame Analysis of the Reporting and Portrayal of Mental Health and Illness in Australian Media’, Australian Journal of Communication, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 59–82
7.
CapellaJ.JamiesonK.1997, Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good, Oxford University Press, New York
8.
ChanJ.1995, ‘Systematically Distorted Communication? Criminological Knowledge, Media Representation and Public Policy’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology (Supplement), pp. 23–30
9.
ConradP.MarkensS.2001, ‘Constructing the “Gay Gene” in the News: Optimism and Skepticism in the US and British Press’, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 356–73
10.
CottleS.1998, ‘Ulrich Beck,’ “Risk Society” and the Media: A Catastrophic View?‘, European Journal of Communication, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5–32
11.
De VreeseC.JochenP.SemetkoH.2001, ‘Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-national Comparative Study of Frames in the News’, Political Communication, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 107–22
12.
D'AngeloP.2002, ‘News Framing as a Multiparadigmatic Research Program: A Response to Entman’, Journal of Communication, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 870–88
13.
ElliotA.ChapmanS.2000, “‘Heroin Hell Their Own Making”: Construction of Heroin Users in the Australian Press, 1992–97, Drug and Alcohol Review, no, 19, pp. 191–201
14.
EntmanR.1993, ‘Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51–58
15.
GansH.1979, Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time, Pantheon Books, New York
16.
GiddensA.1994, ‘Living in a Post-traditional Society’, in BeckU.GiddensA.LashS. (eds), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 56–109
17.
GiulianottiR.1997, ‘Drugs and the Media in the Era of Postmodernity: An Archaeological Analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, no. 19, pp. 413–19
18.
IyengarS.1991, Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
19.
JaspersonA.ShahD.WattsM.1998, ‘Framing and the Public Agenda: Media Effects on the Importance of the Federal Budget Deficit’, Political Communication, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 205–24
20.
LawrenceG.BammerG.ChapmanS.2000, “‘Sending the Wrong Signal”, Analysis of Print Media Reportage of the ACT Heroin Prescription Trial Proposal’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 254–63
21.
LuptonD.1999a, Risk, Routledge, London
22.
LuptonD.1999b, Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23.
ManningP.2001, News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction, Sage, London
24.
MurphyP.MaynardM.2000, ‘Framing the Genetic Testing Issue’, Science Communication, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 133–53
25.
PanZ.KosickiG.1993, ‘Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse’, Political Communication, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–75
26.
PhalenP.AlganE.2001, ‘(Ms)taking Context for Content: Framing the Fourth World Conference on Women’, Political Communication, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 301–20
27.
PhillipsL.2000, ‘Mediated Communication and the Privatization of Public Problems: Discourse on Ecological Risks and Political Action’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 171–207
28.
PutnisP.2001, ‘Popular Discourses and Images of Poverty and Welfare in the News Media’, in FincherRSaundersP. (eds), Creating Unequal Futures? Rethinking Poverty, Inequality and Disadvantage, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 70–101
29.
SemetkoH.ValkenburgP.2000, ‘Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News’, Journal of Communication, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 93–109
30.
ScheufeleD.1999, ‘Framing as a Theory of Media Effects’, Journal of Communication, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 103–22
31.
SchudsonM.1995, The Power of News, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
32.
SchlesingerP.TumberH.MurdochG.1991, ‘The Media Politics of Crime and Criminal Justice’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 42, pp. 397–420
33.
TeeceM.MakkaiT.2000, ‘Print Media Reporting on Drugs and Crime, 1995–1998’, Trends and Issues, no. 158, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, pp. 1–6
34.
TuchmanG.1978, Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality, Free Press, New York
35.
TullochJ.LuptonD.2001, ‘Risk, the Mass Media and Personal Biography’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–27
36.
WynneB.1996, ‘May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide’, in LashS.SzerzynskiB.WynneB. (eds), Risk, Environment and Modernity, Sage, London, pp. 44–83
