In real life, we can face many things and services, which are performed regularly. Supply Chain Management (SCM) is the one that does the business. SCM refers to the management of finished products and their distribution to the final consumer. Many types of services relieve people a lot and create a lot more attachment with people. Online services are very easy for those people who cannot afford to buy equipment from cities. From this, they saved a large part of all processing income and time. The use of bipolar complex fuzzy soft sets (BCFSS) in SCM is investigated in this research. The bipolar complex fuzzy soft Hamacher weighted average (BCFSHWA), bipolar complex fuzzy soft Hamacher ordered weighted average (BCFSHOWA), bipolar complex fuzzy soft Hamacher hybrid average (BCFSHHA), bipolar complex fuzzy soft Hamacher weighted geometric (BCFSHWG), bipolar complex fuzzy soft Hamacher ordered weighted geometric (BCFSHOWG), and bipolar complex fuzzy soft Hamacher hybrid geometric (BCFSHHG) are among the operators that we present and illustrate. We utilize these operators to address bipolar complex fuzzy soft Multi-Attribute Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) issues and analyze their specific instances. We illustrate the efficacy and superiority of our technique over current methods using a numerical example in SCM, highlighting its potential for attaining optimal performance and solutions in SCM scenarios.
MolodtsovD. Soft set theory—first results. Comput Math Appl1999; 37: 19–31.
2.
ZadehLA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control1965; 8: 338–353.
3.
AtanassovK. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Bioautom2016; 20: 1.
4.
PengJJWangJQWuXH, et al.The fuzzy cross-entropy for intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making. Int J Syst Sci2015; 46: 2335–2350.
5.
WangPXuXHWangJQ, et al.Some new operation rules and a new ranking method for interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2017; 32: 1069–1078.
6.
DeliIÇağmanN. Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized soft set theory and its decision making. Appl Soft Comput2015; 28: 109–113.
7.
GargHAroraR. Generalized and group-based generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with applications in decision-making. Appl Intell2018; 48: 343–356.
8.
ChenSM. A new approach to handling fuzzy decision-making problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern1988; 18: 1012–1016.
9.
CabrerizoFJChiclanaFAl-HmouzR, et al.Fuzzy decision making and consensus: challenges. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2015; 29: 1109–1118.
10.
PamucarDCirovicG. The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Syst Appl2015; 42: 3016–3028.
11.
MoslemS. A novel parsimonious spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for sustainable urban transport solutions. Eng Appl Artif Intell2024; 128: 107447.
12.
MoslemSStevicZTanackovI, et al.Sustainable development solutions of public transportation: an integrated IMF SWARA and fuzzy Bonferroni operator. Sustainable Cities Soc2023; 93: 104530.
13.
ZhangWR. Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: a computational framework for cognitive modeling and multi-agent decision analysis. In: NAFIPS/IFIS/NASA’94. Proceedings of the first international joint conference of the North American fuzzy information processing society biannual conference. The industrial fuzzy control and intelligent, December 1994, pp.305–309. IEEE.
14.
ZhangWRZhangL. Yin Yang bipolar logic and bipolar fuzzy logic. Inf Sci (Ny)2004; 165: 265–287.
15.
ZhangWR. Bipolar quantum logic gates and quantum cellular combinatorics are a logical extension to quantum entanglement. J Quantum Inf Sci2013; 3: 93.
16.
ZhangWRPeaceKE. Causality is logically definable—toward an equilibrium-based computing paradigm of quantum agents and quantum intelligence (QAQI) (survey and research). J Quantum Inf Sci2014; 4: 227–268.
17.
ZhangWR. G-CPT symmetry of quantum emergence and submergence–an information conservational multi agent cellular automata unification of CPT symmetry and CP violation for equilibrium-based many-world causal analysis of quantum coherence and decoherence. J Quantum Inf Sci2016; 6: 62.
18.
ZhangWRZhangJHShiY, et al.Bipolar linear algebra and Yin Yang-N-element cellular networks for equilibrium-based bio system simulation and regulation. J Biol Syst2009; 17: 547–576.
19.
LuMBusemeyerJR. Do traditional Chinese theories of Yi Jing (’Yin-Yang) and Chinese medicine go beyond western concepts of mind and matter?Mind Matter2014; 12: 37–59.
20.
SamantaSPalMPalA. Some more results on fuzzy k-competition graphs. Int J Adv Res Artif Intell2014; 3: 60–67.
21.
YangHLLiSGYangWH, et al.Notes on “bipolar fuzzy graphs”. Inf Sci (Ny)2013; 242: 113–121.
22.
ZhangWRPandurangiAKPeaceKE, et al.Mental squares: a generic bipolar support vector machine for psychiatric disorder classification, diagnostic analysis, and neurobiological data mining. Int J Data Min Bioinform2011; 5: 532–557.
23.
PamucarDGokasarITorkayeshAE, et al.Prioritization of unmanned aerial vehicles in transportation systems using the integrated stratified fuzzy rough decision-making approach with the Hamacher operator. Inf Sci (Ny)2023; 622: 374–404.
24.
PamucarDTorkayeshAEBiswasS. Supplier selection in healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy rough decision-making approach. Ann Oper Res2023; 328: 977–1019.
25.
HamidoğluA. A game-theoretical approach on the construction of a novel agri-food supply chain model supported by the government. Expert Syst Appl2024; 237: 121353.
26.
HamidoğluA. A novel one-target game model in the life insurance market. Int J Manage Sci Eng Manage2021; 16: 221–228.
27.
JinLYagerRRMaC, et al.Hesitant cognitive uncertain information in aggregation and decision making. Iran J Fuzzy Syst2024; 21: 1–9.
28.
RamotDMiloRFriedmanM, et al.Complex fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2002; 10: 171–186.
29.
TamirDEJinLKandelA. A new interpretation of complex membership grade. Int J Intell Syst2011; 26: 285–312.
30.
MahmoodTUr RehmanU. A novel approach towards bipolar complex fuzzy sets and their applications in generalized similarity measures. Int J Intell Syst2022; 37: 535–567.
31.
RehmanUUMahmoodT. The generalized dice similarity measures for bipolar complex fuzzy set and its applications to pattern recognition and medical diagnosis. Comput Appl Math2022; 41: 265.
32.
MahmoodTRehmanUUAhmmadJ, et al.Bipolar complex fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their applications in multi-attribute decision making. Mathematics2021; 10: 23.
33.
MahmoodTRehmanUU. A method to multi-attribute decision-making technique based on Dombi aggregation operators under bipolar complex fuzzy information. Comput Appl Math2022; 41: 47.
34.
MahmoodTUr RehmanUAliZ. Analysis and application of Aczel-Alsina aggregation operators based on bipolar complex fuzzy information in multiple attribute decision-making. Inf Sci (Ny)2023; 619: 817–833.
35.
MahmoodTUr RehmanUAliZ, et al.Bonferroni mean operators based on bipolar complex fuzzy setting and their applications in multi-attribute decision making. AIMS Math2022; 7: 17166–17197.
36.
MahmoodTRehmanUUAliZ, et al.Identification and classification of aggregation operators using bipolar complex fuzzy settings and their application in decision support systems. Mathematics2022; 10: 1726.
37.
WeiGAlsaadiFEHayatT, et al.Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst2018; 20: 1–12.
38.
JanaCPalMWangJQ. Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in the multiple-attribute decision-making process. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput2019; 10: 3533–3549.
MajiPKBiswasRKRoyA. Fuzzy soft sets. Int J Mod Eng Res (IJMER)2001; 2: 157–168.
41.
BorahMNeogTJSutDK. A study on some operations of fuzzy soft sets. Int J Mod Eng Res (IJMER)2012; 2: 157–168.
42.
BorgohainKGohainC. Some new operations on fuzzy soft sets. Int J Mod Eng Res (IJMER)2014; 4: 65–68.
43.
RoyARMajiPK. A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision-making problems. J Comput Appl Math2007; 203: 412–418.
44.
ÇelikYYamakS. Fuzzy soft set theory applied to medical diagnosis using fuzzy arithmetic operations. J Inequal Appl2013; 2013: 1–9.
45.
MajumdarPSamantaSK. On similarity measures of fuzzy soft sets. Int J Adv Soft Comput Appl2011; 3: 1–8.
46.
AliMIShabirM. Logic connectives for soft sets and fuzzy soft sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2013; 22: 1431–1442.
47.
MajumdarPSamantaSK. Generalized fuzzy soft sets. Comput Math Appl2010; 59: 1425–1432.
48.
AroraRGargH. Prioritized averaging/geometric aggregation operators under the intuitionistic fuzzy soft set environment. Sci Iran2018; 25: 466–482.
49.
HayatKTariqZLughoferE, et al.New aggregation operators on group-based generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. Soft comput2021; 25: 13353–13364.
50.
GargHAroraR. Bonferroni mean aggregation operators under intuitionistic fuzzy soft set environment and their applications to decision-making. J Oper Res Soc2018; 69: 1711–1724.
51.
ZulqarnainRMXinXLSaqlainM, et al.TOPSIS method is based on the correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and aggregation operators with their application in decision-making. J Math2021; 2021: 1–16.
52.
AbdullahSAslamMUllahK. Bipolar fuzzy soft sets and its applications in decision-making problems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2014; 27: 729–742.
53.
RiazMTehrimST. Bipolar fuzzy soft mappings with application to bipolar disorders. Int J Biomath2019; 12: 1950080.
54.
AliGAkramMKoamAN, et al.Parameter reductions of bipolar fuzzy soft sets with their decision-making algorithms. Symmetry2019; 11: 949.
55.
JanaCPalM. Application of bipolar intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets in decision-making problems. Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl (IJFSA)2018; 7: 32–55.
56.
AkramMFengFBorumand SaeidA, et al.A new multiple criteria decision-making method based on bipolar fuzzy soft graphs. Iran J Fuzzy Syst2018; 15: 73–92.
57.
RiazMRiazMJamilN, et al.Distance and similarity measures for bipolar fuzzy soft sets with application to pharmaceutical logistics and supply chain management. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2022; 42: 3169–3188.
58.
JanaCPalMWangJ. A robust aggregation operator for multi-criteria decision-making method with bipolar fuzzy soft environment. Iran J Fuzzy Syst2019; 16: 1–16.
59.
ThirunavukarasuPSureshRAshokkumarV. Theory of complex fuzzy soft set and its applications. Int J Innovative Res Sci Technol2017; 3: 13–18.
60.
SelvachandranGSinghPK. Interval-valued complex fuzzy soft set and its application. Int J Uncertain Quantif2018; 8: 101–117.
61.
WeiGAlsaadiFEHayatT, et al.Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst2018; 20: 1–12.
62.
MahmoodTRehmanUUJaleelA, et al.Bipolar complex fuzzy soft sets and their applications in decision-making. Mathematics2022; 10: 1048.
63.
MahmoodTJaleelARehmanUU. Pattern recognition and medical diagnosis based on trigonometric similarity measures for bipolar complex fuzzy soft sets. Soft comput2023; 27: 11125–11154.
64.
MahmoodTUr RehmanUAliZ. A novel complex fuzzy N-soft sets and their decision-making algorithm. Complex Intell Syst2021; 7: 2255–2280.
65.
RehmanUUMahmoodT. Picture fuzzy N-soft sets and their applications in decision-making problems. Fuzzy Inf Eng2021; 13: 335–367.
66.
MahmoodTUr RehmanUAhmmadJ. Complex picture fuzzy N-soft sets and their decision-making algorithm. Soft comput2021; 25: 13657–13678.
67.
UllahKNaeemMHussainA, et al.Evaluation of electric motor cars based frank power aggregation operators under picture fuzzy information and a multi-attribute group decision-making process. IEEE Access2023; 11: 67201–67219.
68.
OzerO. Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators based on complex picture fuzzy sets and their applications in decision-making problems. J Innovative Res Math Comput Sci2022; 1: 33–54.
69.
HussainAUllahKPamucarD, et al.Assessment of solar panel using multiattribute decision-making approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel Alsina heronian mean operator. Int J Intell Syst2023; 2023: 6268613.
70.
Ur RehmanU. Selection of database management system by using multi-attribute decision-making approach based on probability complex fuzzy aggregation operators. J Innovative Res Math Comput Sci2023; 2: 1–16.
71.
UllahKNaeemMHussainA, et al.Evaluation of electric motor cars based frank power aggregation operators under picture fuzzy information and a multi-attribute group decision-making process. IEEE Access2023; 11: 67201–67219.
72.
KhanMRUllahKKhanQ, et al.Confidence levels measurement of mobile phone selection using a multi-attribute decision-making approach with unknown attribute weight information based on T-spherical fuzzy aggregation operators. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc2024; 2024: 6572374.
73.
AliABozanićDAkramM, et al.Heronian mean operators based multi-attribute decision making algorithm using T-spherical fuzzy information. J Innovative Res Math Comput Sci2022; 1: 55–82.
