A Belated Submission to the Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism

Abstract

Submissions to this year’s Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism pointed out that journalism tertiary education—students under the guidance of experienced and well-respected journalism practitioners—is in a position to help revive investigative and civic journalism. As Edith Cowan’s Kayt Davies (2014) pointed out as far back as 2014, public interest journalism practised in tertiary journalism programmes could potentially be funded through bodies such as the Australian Research Council (ARC) and the research grants system. Such revenue sources not only transcend the business model but also exist at a relatively acceptable arm’s length from the government.

However, research—journalism or otherwise—is ineligible for ARC funding without academic research ethics committee approval. Unfortunately, the process of applying for approval from a committee, whose terms of reference are guided by an academy-approved, government-developed document (i.e., the National Statement), is so offensive to journalistic ideology that it renders the whole concept of public interest journalism in the university sector untenable. This essay examines the National Statement and draws similarities between its values and beliefs and professional journalism ideology (as articulated by the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), the Australian Press Council, the Dart Centre for Journalism and Trauma and the Hunter Institute for Mental Health). It then explores inbuilt flexibilities in the National Statement that offer journalism as a research methodology, a means of maintaining its independence. It then finishes with an updated survey of how journalism programmes around Australia negotiate the conflict between academic research ethics and professional ideology while engaging in practice-based research. In short, this essay explores options for the revival of public interest journalism that are acceptable to both academy and journalism sensibilities.

Keywords

Journalism ideology journalism education journalism research tertiary education ethics committees National Statement MEAA Codes of Ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Research Council. (2008). ERA Indicator Descriptors. Retrieved 23 September 2013 , from www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA_Indicator_Descriptors.pdf

Bacon

(2006). Journalism as research? Australian Journalism Review, 28(2), 147–157.

Biggs

, & Buchler

(2009). Supervision in an alternative paradigm. TEXT: Journal of Writing and Writing Courses, Special Issue No. 6, 1–14. Retrieved 21 May 2015 , from http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue6/content.htm

Birnbauer

(2017, June). A model for non-profit investigative and public interest journalism, Submission to the Senate Inquiry on the Future of Public Interest Journalism. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Future_of_Public_Interest_Journalism/PublicInterestJournalism/Submissions

Davies

(2010). A journalistic study of Narrogin’s feuding families. Research Journalism, 1(1), 1–29.

Davies

(2014). HRECs and journalism research: The uneven playing field. The Pacific Journalism Review, 20(1), 99–116.

Farrer

(RMIT University), Personal Communication, July 31, 2017.

Farrer

, & Wake

(2017, 15 June). Joint Submission to the Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Future_of_Public_Interest_Journalism/PublicInterestJournalism/Submissions

Hansard. (2017, 11 July). Hansard of the Senate Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism: Impact of Search Engines, Social Media and Disinformation on Journalism in Australia, Sydney.

10.

Henningham

(1995). Journalism in the USA and Australia: Some comparisons. Australian Journal of Communication, 22(1), 77–91.

11.

Lamble

(2004). Documenting the methodology of journalism. Australian Journalism Review, 26(1), 85–106.

12.

Lindgren

, & Phillips

(2011). Conceptualising journalism as research: Two paradigms. Australian Journalism Review, 33(2), 73–83.

13.

Lloyd

(1985). Profession: Journalist. Sydney: Hale & Iremonger.

14.

Millett

(Curtin University), Personal Communication, April 29, 2014.

15.

Moran

, & Davidson

(2013, 12 March). Gina Rinehart takes Fairfax journalist Adele Ferguson to court. The Australian.

16.

Nash

(2013). Journalism as a research discipline. The Pacific Journalism Review, 19(2), 123–135.

17.

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2013). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007)—Updated December 2013. Canberra: NHMRC.

18.

Pirkis

and Blood

R. W.

(2001) Suicide and the media: A critical review. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia

19.

Richards

(2010). Journalism’s tangled web: Business, ethics and professional practice. In Meyers

(Ed.), Journalism ethics: A philosophical approach (pp. 171–183). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

20.

US Department of State. (2012, 17 April). IIP digital—Speaking on and off the record— to the point. Retrieved 23 September 2014 , from http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/publication/2012/01/20120103162705yelhsa0.3310205.html#axzz3E5zAyP5O

21.

Vine

(2010). The larrikin paradox: ‘Irresponsibility’ as a frame of reference for journalistic ‘responsibility’ in western liberal democracy. The International Journal of the Humanities, 8(2), 271–284.

22.

Vine

(2014). Is Burchett a traitor to Australian journalism? A cultural historiographical approach to why this may not matter. Journal of the European Association for Studies of Australia, 5(1), 104–121.

23.

Vine

, Batty

, & Muir

(2016). A question of ethics: The challenges for journalism practice as a mode of research. Journal of Media Practice, 17(2–3), 232–249.

24.

Wake

(2015a). Aiding journalism: Australian journalism educators and their work in post conflict states (Unpublished PhD Thesis).

25.

Wake

(2015b). Delay journalism practice until academic scholarship is mastered. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 25(1), 55–61.

26.

Warren

, Walters

, Di Marzo

, & Johnson

(2005). Inaugural Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance report into the state of press freedom in Australia from September 11, 2001–2005. Redfern: Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance.