You Have My Word

Abstract

Journalists’ reliance on confidential sources for their articles is a lynchpin of journalistic practice. If journalists are unable to provide certain sources anonymity, ‘it is likely that critical information benefiting the public will not be passed on’ (Wade, 2014, p. 555). Public debate is thereby damaged as it ‘hides corruption, it undermines accountability and it fundamentally undermines the capacity for society to provide a safer, nurturing environment in which citizens can participate’ (ibid.). This article focuses on three important aspects of journalist source confidentiality: journalists’ authority to give confidentiality undertakings; the entry into such undertakings; and the types of sources, including the related question of who instigates such undertakings. This study draws on the results of an Australian survey conducted in 2014.

Keywords

journalists’ sources confidential sources confidentiality confidentiality obligation confidentiality promises shield laws

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABC Code of Practice (2014). Retrieved from http://about.abc.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ABCCodeOfPractice20143.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

ABC Editorial Policies. (2008, July). Sources and conflicts: Review of the adequacy of ABC Editorial Policies relating to source protection and to the reporting by journalists of events in which they are participants (final report).

ABC Editorial Policies. (2008). Retrieved from http://about.abc.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/SourcesAndConflictsReportJuly2008.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

ABC Television, Media Watch. (2012, February 27). The no-name game. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3440733.htm Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3440733.htm (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

ABC Television (2013, March 25). Sources, spills and strategies. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3723517.htm (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

Australian Press Council. (July 2014). Statement of privacy principles. Retrieved from http://www.presscouncil.org.au/uploads/52321/ufiles/PRIVACY_PRINCIPLES_-_July_2014.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

Fernandez

J.M.

(2015a). Data retention’s threat to shield laws. In Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance Press Freedom Report (Ed.), Going after whistleblowers, going after journalism: The report into the state of press freedom in Australia in 2015 (pp. 35–36). Sydney, NSW: Media Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.pressfreedom.org.au/press-media-alliance-freedom-report/introduction/foreword (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

Fernandez

J.M.

(2015b). Secret journos’ business. The Walkley Magazine, Issue 83, pp. 31–32.

Fernandez

J.M.

, & Pearson

(2015). Shield laws in Australia: Legal and ethical implications for journalists and their confidential sources. Pacific Journalism Review, 21(1), 61–78.

10.

News Limited Editorial Code of Conduct Professional Conduct Policy. (July 2012). Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/help/editorial-code-of-conduct (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

11.

Pearson

, & Fernandez

J.M.

(2015). Censorship in Australia: Intrusions into media freedom flying beneath the international free expression radar. Pacific Journalism Review, 21(1), 40–60.

12.

Posetti

(2015, June 3). New research: 11-point plan for protecting journalism sources in the digital age. World News Publishing Focus. Retrieved from http://blog.wan-ifra.org/2015/06/03/new-research-11-point-plan-for-protecting-journalism-sources-in-the-digital-age (accessed on 28 September 2015 ).

13.

Stanley

(2008). The law of confidentiality: A restatement. Oregon: Hart Publishing.

14.

Wade

S.G.

(2014, July 2). Evidence (Journalists) Amendment Bill 2014. Second reading. Parliamentary debates. House of Assembly. Parliament of South Australia.