New Zealand’s Performance-Based Research Fund regime makes no explicit provision for journalism practice-as-research, although it does not exclude it either. The Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) has hinted at applied research changes that may open the door to investigative journalism and other long-form modes for the next audit in 2018. As a growing global debate responds to international pressure on journalism practitioner-academics to publish scholarly outputs and seek external research income, there has been a parallel paradigm shift in defining methodologies for some journalism as research. This article advocates a bolder approach by journalism educators in New Zealand to push the boundaries for greater acceptance of journalism research methodologies and to claim an enhanced academic space as a ‘critic and conscience of society’.
AbplanalpK. (2012). ‘Blood money’: A NZ investigative journalism case study. Pacific Journalism Review, 18(1), 128–147.
2.
BaconW. (2006a). Journalism as research. Australian Journalism Review, 28(2), 147–157.
3.
BaconW. (2006b). Journalism as research? Thinking about journalism research in an Australian context. Pacific Media Centre Online. Retrieved 26January2015, from www.pmc.aut.ac.nz/research/journalism-research-thinking-about-journalism-research-australian-context
4.
BaconW. (2011). Investigative journalism in the academy—Possibilities for storytelling across time and space. Pacific Journalism Review, 17(1), 45–66.
5.
BaconW. (2012). Frontline: An innovative direction in academic journalism. Pacific Journalism Review, 18(2), 153–165.
6.
BiggsM. (2000). Editorial: The foundations of practice-based research. Working Papers in Art and Design, 1. Retrieved 29January2015, from http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/7322/900527.pdf?sequence=1
7.
ClearA.ClearT. (2011). The fate of computing in research performance evaluations. Paper presented at the second annual conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education New Zealand (CITRENZ2011), Rotorua, New Zealand, July6–8, 2011.
8.
ClearT. (2007). Valuing computer science education research? In BerglundA.WiggbergM. (Eds), Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling (pp. 8–18). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
9.
CREATEC Research Centre (n.d.). About research journalism. Research Journalism. Retrieved 25January2015, from https://researchjournalism.wordpress.com/about/
10.
HannisG. (2007). NZ’s PBRF experience and the implications for Australia’s Research Quality Framework. Australian Journalism Review, 29(1), 13–26.
11.
HannisG. (2011). Creating a research culture at New Zealand-based journalism programs. Australian Journalism Review, 33(1), 49–52.
12.
HannisG. (2014). Journalism research and the Performance-Based Research Fund in New Zealand. Australian Journalism Review, 36(2), 131–144.
13.
IngsW. (2014). The authored voice: Emerging approaches to exegesis design in creative practice PhDs. Educational Philosophy and Theory (Incorporating Access), November, Online. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2014.974017
14.
IngsW. (2015). AUT professor profiles: Welby Ings. Retrieved 3February2015, from www.aut.ac.nz/profiles/welby-ings
15.
KnightA. (2011). A new ERA for journalism educators. Australian Journalism Review, 33(1), 29–34.
16.
KorauabaT. (2014). Kiribati media, science and politics: Telling the story of climate change in a ‘disappearing nation’. Pacific Journalism Monographs No. 3. Auckland, New Zealand. Pacific Media Centre.
17.
LindgrenM.PhillipsG. (2011). Conceptualising journalism as research: Two paradigms. Australian Journalism Review, 33(2), 73–83.
18.
ManningS. (2011). Security intelligence and the public interest: An examination into how keeping security intelligence and classified information secret, and privy only to a state’s executive and aligned operational agencies, affects the function of a modern democracy [Video documentary: Behind the Shroud]. Masters of Communication studies degree, Pacific Media Centre, School of Communication Studies, Auckland University of Technology. Retrieved 3February2015, from www.pmc.aut.ac.nz/research/security-intelligence-and-public-interest-zaoui-case-study
19.
MarbrookJ. (2014). Cap Bocage: When a mountain fell into the sea [Documentary film]. Trailer Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I_7dxSYV8E
20.
MiddletonS. (2008). Research assessment as a pedagogical device. A Bernstenian exploration of its impact on New Zealand’s subject/s of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(2), 125–136. doi: 10.1080/01425690701835152
21.
NashC. (2013). Journalism as a research discipline. Pacific Journalism Review, 19(2), 123–135.
22.
NashC. (2014). Research degrees in journalism: What is an exegesis?Pacific Journalism Review, 20(1), 76–98.
23.
NiblockS. (2007). ‘From knowing how’ to ‘being able’: Negotiating the meanings of reflective practice and reflexive research in journalism studies. Journalism Practice, 1(1), 30–32.
24.
NiblockS. (2012). Envisioning journalism practice as research. Journalism Practice, 6(4), 497–512.
25.
NiblockS. (2014). From ‘knowing how’ to ‘being able’: Negotiating the meanings of reflective practice and reflexive research in journalism studies. Journalism Practice, 1(1), 30–32.
26.
Pacific Media Centre (PMC). (2015). About the Pacific media centre: Informed journalism and media research. Pacific Media Centre Online website. Retrieved 3February2015, from www.pmc.aut.ac.nz/content/about-pacific-media-centre
27.
PearsonM. (2011). A poor fit for journalism research. Australian Journalism Review, 33(1), 25–27.
28.
RobieD. (2012). Coups, conflicts and human rights: Pacific media paradigms and challenges. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 22(2), 217–229.
29.
RobieD. (2014). Don’t spoil my beautiful face: Media, mayhem and human rights in the Pacific. Auckland: Little Island Press.
30.
Tertiary Education Commission (2004). Performance-based research fund: Evaluating research excellence: The 2003 assessment. Wellington: TEC.
31.
Tertiary Education Commission (2007). Performance-based research fund: Evaluating research excellence: The 2006 assessment. Wellington: TEC.
32.
Tertiary Education Commission (2012a). Performance-based research fund: Social sciences and other cultural/social sciences panel-specific guidelines 2012. Wellington: TEC.
33.
Tertiary Education Commission (2012b). Performance-based research fund: Creative and performing arts panel-specific guidelines 2012. Wellington: TEC.
34.
Tertiary Education Commission (2013). Performance-based research fund: Evaluating research excellence—The 2012 assessment. [Final report]. Wellington. TEC.
35.
WoodJ. (2000). The culture of academic rigour: does design research actually need it?The Design Journal, 3(1), 44–57. Doi: 10.2752/146069200789393599
