Bushfires are a major part of the Australian natural disaster landscape; causing severe property damage and loss of life. Since 2009 there have been four major bushfire events in Australia warranting government inquiry. The recommendations from such inquiries are intended to drive future policy and decision making, reflecting a commitment on behalf of authorities to learn from past events. For authorities, ensuring the successful communication of bushfire safety is the key to securing legitimacy, yet communication within the public sector is characterized by politics, legal constraints, media attention and public scrutiny. The perception of risk and the desire to promote an image of competence can inhibit innovation, particularly in relation to public sector internet communications. We should not assume that governments want greater community participation when there is both economic and political risk involved in doing so. Nevertheless, greater community participation in bushfire communications appears to be a key recommendation of the recent bushfire inquiries and which the public sector generally and fire and emergency services organizations specifically, are under some pressure to accommodate. Internet-based communications have a key role to play in filling the gap, but must balance community desire for participation with government requirements to be reliable and minimize risk. As part of preparations for a project which aims to provide greater community involvement in the LandgateFireWatchinternet map service, this article reviews the opportunities and threats inherent in government/community bushfire communication.
AkamaY.IvankaT. (2010). What community?: Facilitating awareness of “community” through playful triggers. Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900444
2.
Al-DebeiM.M. (2011). The value of government mandated location-based services in emergencies in Australia. Journal of Information Technology Research, 4(4), 41–68.
3.
AloudatA.MichaelK. (2011). Toward the regulation of ubiquitous mobile government: A case study on location-based emergency services in Australia. Electronic Commerce Research, 11, 31–74.
4.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.
5.
BerselliS.BurgerS.CloseJ. (2012). Crisis mapping community social media information during and after large-scale disasters in Victoria. Unpublished bachelor thesis, Worchester Polytechnic Institute, Worchester, USA.
6.
BirdD.LingM.HaynesK. (2012). Flooding Facebook—The use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 27–33.
7.
BouraJ. (1998). Community fireguard: Creating partnerships with the community to minimise the impact of bushfire. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13(3), 59–64.
8.
BrummelR.F.NelsonK.C.JakesP.J. (2012). Burning through organizational boundaries? Examining inter-organizational communication networks in policy-mandated collaborative bushfire planning groups. Global Environmental Change, 22, 516–528.
9.
BrunsA.BurgessJ.CrawfordK.ShawK. (2012). #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation. Retrieved September19, 2013, from http://cci.edu.au/floodsreport.pdf
10.
Bush Fire Front (2012). Retrieved September19, 2013, from http://bushfirefront.com.au/
11.
Bushfire Connect (n.d.). Retrieved September19, 2013, from http://bushfireconnect.org/main
12.
ChenP.GibsonR.LusoliW.WardS. (2007). Australian governments and online communication. In YoungS. (Ed.),Government communication in Australia(pp. 161–180). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
COAG (2011). National strategy for disaster resillience: Building our nation’s resilience to disasters. Canberra, Australia: Council of Australian Governments.
14.
DuftyN. (2012). Using social media to build community disaster resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 40–45.
15.
Economics and Industry Standing Committee (2012). Inquiry into the 2011 Kimberley Ultramarathon. Perth: Parliament of Western Australia.
16.
ElsworthG.StevensK.GilbertJ.GoodmanH.RhodesA. (2008). Evaluating the community safety approach to bushfire in Australia: Towards an assessment of what works and how. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the European Evaluation Society, Lisbon, Portugal.
17.
FreemanM.FreemanA. (2010). Bonding over bushfires: Social networks in action. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society: Social Implications of Emerging Technologies, Piscataway, USA
18.
HaimesP.JungJ.MedleyS. (2012). Bridging the gap: Scenario-based design as a solution for delayed access to users. Paper presented at the Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Conference. Retrieved September19, 2013 from http://acuads.com.au/conference/2012-conference/
19.
HeadB. (2007). The public service and government communication: Pressures and dilemmas. In YoungS. (Ed.),Government communication in Australia(pp. 36–50). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
KeeltyM.J. (2011). A shared responsibility: The report of the Perth Hills bushfire February 2011 review. Perth: Department of Premier and Cabinet, Government of Western Australia.
21.
KeeltyM.J. (2012). Appreciating the risk: Margaret River bushfire special inquiry report. Perth: Department of Premier and Cabinet, Government of Western Australia.
22.
KeimM.NojiE. (2011). Emergent use of social media: A new age of opportunity for disaster resilience. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 6(1), 47–54.
23.
KoH.ChoC.H.RobertsM.S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural exuation model of interactive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 55–70.
24.
LiuB.F.HorsleyJ.S. (2007). The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4), 377–393.
25.
LiuS.B.PalenL. (2010). The new cartographers: Crisis map mashups and the emergence of neographic practice. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 37, 69–90.
26.
McGeeT.K. (2011). Public engagement in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation and preparedness: Case studies from Canada, the US and Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2524–2532.
27.
NichollsS.GlennyL. (2005). Communicating for recovery: A case study in communication between the Australian Capital Territory Government and the ACT community after the ACT bushfires, January 2003. In GallowayC.Kwansah-AidooK. (Eds),Public relations issues and crisis management(pp. 41–58). Southbank, Victoria: Thompson.
28.
NorrisP.CurticeJ. (2008). Getting the message out: A two-step model of the role of the internet in campaign communication flows during the 2005 British General Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(4), 3–13.
29.
O’NeillP. (2004). Developing a risk communication model to encourage community safety from natural hazards. Wollongong, New South Wales: State Emergency Service.
30.
OrrG. (2007). Government communication and the law. In YoungS. (Ed.),Government communication in Australia(pp. 19–35). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
PatonD.KellyG.BurgeltP.T.DohertyM. (2006). Preparing for bushfires: Understanding intentions. Disaster Prevention and Management, 15(4), 566–575.
32.
PriorT.D. (2010). Householder bushfire preparation: Decisionmaking and the implications for risk communication.Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Tasmania. Tasmania.
33.
Queensland Police Service (2011). Disaster management and social media—a case study. Brisbane, Queensland Police Service Media and Public Affairs Branch. Retrieved September19, 2013 from http://www.police.qld.gov.au/Resources/Internet/services/reportsPublications/documents/QPSSocialMediaCaseStudy.pdf
34.
QuinnS. (2012). Communicating in an emergency: How Australian emergency management authorities connect with the community. Paper presented at the Third Annual Online Conference on Networks and Communities, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA.
35.
RoehrichN.ArmstrongM. (2004). Electronic government in Australia. In EifertM.PuschelJ. O. (Eds),National electronic government: Comparing governance structures in multi-layer administrations(pp. 182–210). New York: Routledge.
36.
RohrmannB. (2007). Exploring information for residents on websites of fire authorities—practical experiences. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22(22), 10–15.
37.
SharpE.ThwaitesR.MillarJ.CurtisA. (2009). Factors affecting community-agency trust in bushfire management: Community member perspectives. Albury, NSW: Charles Sturt University, Institute for Land, Water and Society.
38.
SmythR. (1999). Australian government communication: A paradigm shift. Asia-Pacific Public Relations Journal, 1(2), 59–85.
39.
TomanE.Shindler. (2006). Wildland fire and fuel management: Principles for effective communication. In McCaffreyS. (Ed.),The public and wildland fire management: Social science findings for managers(pp. 111–123). Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
40.
Ushahidi (2012). Crowdmap: Create and share interactive maps online. Retrieved September19, 2013 from https://crowdmap.com/
41.
Victorian Government (2010). 2009 Victorian bushfires royal commission: Final report. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria.
42.
YoungS. (2007). Innovations in Australian government communication. In YoungS. (Ed.),Government communication in Australia(pp. 229–254). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
