The Computer as a Tool in Creative Music Making

Abstract

This study is an exploratory observation of optimal conditions for creative music making as illustrated by two boys who composed music utilizing a researcher designed computer program. The purposes of this project are to: a) highlight the students' moments of most creative output relative to a theory of the interaction between reward and task conditions, and, b) illustrate how the students' perceptions of reward and task conditions alter levels of intrinsic motivation and creativity. The results show that unobtrusively recorded music explorations offered glimpses into subjects' creative potential which was otherwise neither realized nor expected. This suggests we should become more aware of students who may be harboring creative talent which is not visible 'upon demand.' Suggestions are offered for the type of environment most conducive to creative thinking and production. Finally, it is suggested that the computer be used as a flexible and practical tool for motivating the musical creative output of children.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amabile, T.M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221-233.

Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Bangs, R.L. (1992). An application of Amabile's model of creativity to music instruction: A comparison of motivational strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.

Deci, E.L. , & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

Folger, R. , Rosenfield, D. , & Hays, R.P. (1976). Equity and intrinsic motivation: The role of choice . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 557-564.

Getzels, J.W. (1964). Creative thinking, problem solving, and instruction . In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction (pp. 240-276). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Getzels, J. , & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York : John Wiley.

Hennessey, B.A. & Amabile, T.M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 11-38). New York: Cambridge University Press,.

Kruglanski, A. , Friedman, E. , & Zeevi, G. (1971). The effects of extrinsic incentives on some qualitative aspects of task performance. Journal of Personality, 39, 606-617.

10.

Lepper, M.R. , & Greene, D. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children's intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 479-486.

11.

Lepper, M.R. , Greene, D. , & Nisbett, R.E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "Overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137.

12.

Perkins, D.N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

Perkins, D.N. (1984). Creativity by design. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 18-25.

14.

Tarnowski, S.M. , & Leclerc, J. (1994). Musical play of preschoolers and teacher-child interaction. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education . Fall/Winter, 1994, 9-16.

15.

Upitis, R. (1989). The craft of composition: helping children create music with computer tools. Psychomusicology, 8(2), 151-161.

16.

Webster, P. (1989). Composition software and issues surrounding its use in research settings with children. Psychomusicology, 8(2), 163-169.

17.

Webster, P. (1991). Measure of Creative Thinking in Music (MCTM). Administrative Guidelines. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

18.

Wolfe, E.W. , & Linden, K.W. (1991). Investigation of the relationship between intrinsic motivation and musical creativity. Purdue University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 351 370).