Meet4Music (M4M) is a low-threshold community music program based at the University of Music and Performing Arts Graz, Austria, offering free participatory sessions to people from all social and cultural backgrounds, including students. The program allows attendees to experience an emerging field of music pedagogy and approach current challenges of migration and cultural diversity from an artistic perspective. The purpose of this study was to explore how students considered and reflected on their M4M experiences. Research questions included the following: (1) How did students consider the experience of making music in a heterogeneous ensemble, and what meanings might they have made from it? And, (2) What aspects of M4M may have contributed to artistic and interpersonal enrichment, and in what ways? We examined meanings developed across the various practices involved in this artistic initiative, with a specific focus on the students’ experiences. To do so, qualitative data based on their written reflections are presented, analyzed, and discussed. Findings include attributions for M4M and personal impact. Themes center on a holistic understanding of the musical community of the program and students’ reflexive and responsive attitudes. Implications include refining notions of artistic citizenship and recommendations for higher music education.
AlheitP.DausienB. (2018). Bildungsprozesse über die Lebensspanne und lebenslanges Lernen [Educational processes across the lifespan and lifelong learning]. In TippeltR.Schmidt-HerthaB. (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungsforschung (pp. 877–903). Springer VS.
2.
Arbeitskreis Deutscher Qualifikationsrahmen. (2011). Deutscher Qualifikationsrahmen für lebenslanges Lernen [German qualification framework for lifelong learning]. https://www.dqr.de/dqr/de/home/home_node.html
3.
BallantyneJ.BakerF. A. (2013). Leading together, learning together: Music education and music therapy students’ perceptions of a shared practicum. Research Studies in Music Education, 35(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X13488471
4.
BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education. Oxford University Press.
5.
BenjaminW. (2007). Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit [The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction]. In SchöttkerD. (Ed.), Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit und weitere Dokumente (pp. 7–50). Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1939)
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
8.
BowmanW. (2004). Cognition and the body: Perspectives from music education. In BreslerL. (Ed.), Knowing bodies, moving minds: Toward embodied teaching and learning (pp. 29–50). Kluwer Academic Press.
9.
BrandenburgR.GlasswellK.JonesM.RyanJ. (Eds.). (2017). Reflective theory and practice in teacher education. Springer.
10.
BräuerG. (2016). Das Portfolio als Reflexionsmedium für Lehrende und Studierende [The portfolio as a medium for reflection for teachers and students]. Verlag Barbara Budrich.
11.
BrownJ. E. (2009). Reflective practice: A tool for measuring the development of generic skills in the training of professional musicians. International Journal of Music Education, 27(4), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761409345437
12.
BucuraE. (2020). Rethinking excellence in music education. Visions of Research in Music Education, 36. http://www.rider.edu/~vrme
13.
BucuraE. (2022). Bonding and Bridging: Perceptions of Social Capital in Community Music. Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts, 9, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajha.X-Y-Z
14.
CareyG.CouttsC.GrantS.HarrisonS.DwyerR. (2018). Enhancing learning and teaching in the tertiary music studio through reflection and collaboration. Music Education Research, 20(4), 399–411.
15.
ChenJ. C. W. (2012). A pilot study mapping students’ composing strategies: Implications for teaching computer-assisted composition. Research Studies in Music Education, 34(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X12465515
16.
ConwayC.ErosJ. (2016). Descriptions of the second stage of music teachers’ careers. Research Studies in Music Education, 38(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X16672607
17.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE.
18.
CoulsonD.HarveyM. (2013). Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: A framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752726
19.
Department for Education and Employment. (1998). The learning age: A renaissance for a New Britain. Sheffield University.
20.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think. D.C. Heath & Co.
21.
ElliottD. J. (1990). Music as culture: Toward a multicultural concept of arts education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 24(1), 147–166.
22.
ElliottD. J. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. Oxford University Press.
23.
ElliottD. J. (2005). Introduction. In ElliotD. J. (Ed.), Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues (pp. 3–18). Oxford University Press.
24.
ElliottD. J. (2007). Puerto Rico: A site of critical performative pedagogy. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 6(1), 1–24. http://act.maydaygroup.org/volume-6-issue-1/
25.
ElliottD. J.SilvermanM. (2015). Music matters: A philosophy of music education. Oxford University Press.
26.
ElliottD. J.SilvermanM.BowmanW. (Eds.). (2016). Artistic citizenship: Artistry, social responsibility, and ethical praxis. Oxford University Press.
27.
ElliottD. J.SilvermanM.McPhersonG. E. (2019). Philosophical and qualitative perspectives on assessment in music education: Introduction, aims and overview. In ElliottD. J.SilvermanM.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical and qualitative assessment in music education (pp. 3–26). Oxford University Press.
GandeA.Kruse-WeberS. (2017). Addressing new challenges for a community music project in the context of higher music education: A conceptual framework. London Review of Education, 15(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.3.04
30.
GauntH.DuffyC.CoricA.DelgadoI. R. G.MessasL.PryimenkoO.SveidahlH. (2021). Musicians as “makers in society”: A conceptual foundation for contemporary professional higher music education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 713648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713648
31.
GhayeT. (2011). Teaching and learning through reflective practice: A practical guide for positive action. Routledge.
32.
HallamS. (2015). The power of music: A research synthesis of the impact of actively making music on the intellectual, social and personal development of children and young people. International Music Education Research Centre (iMerc).
33.
HammernessK.Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ.BerlinerD.Cochran-SmithM.McDonaldM.ZeichnerK. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). Jossey-Bass.
HigginsL. (2006). The community in community music: Hospitality—friendship. In CoffmanD.HigginsL. (Eds.), Creating partnerships, making links, and promoting change (pp. 1–20). ISME Commission for Community Music Activity Seminar.
HigginsL. (2012a). Community music in theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
38.
HigginsL. (2012b). One-to-one encounters: Facilitators, participants, and friendship. Theory into Practice, 51, 159–166.
39.
HigginsL.WillinghamL. (2017). Engaging in community music: An introduction. Routledge.
40.
HirschM.SteinerJ. (2014). Musizieren und Unterrichten im Dazwischen [Intersections of making music and teaching]. In HasitschkaW. (Ed.), Performing translation: Schnittstellen zwischen Kunst, Pädagogik und Wissenschaft (pp. 319–343). Löcker.
KallioA. A. (2015). Factional stories: Creating a methodological space for collaborative reflection and inquiry in music education research. Research Studies in Music Education, 37(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X15589261
43.
KennyA. (2016). Communities of musical practice. Routledge.
44.
KolbD. A.FryR. E. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In CooperC. (Ed.), Theories of group processes (pp. 33−57). John Wiley & Sons.
45.
KorthagenF. A. J.VasalosA. (2009, August25–29). From reflection to presence and mindfulness: 30 years of developments concerning the concept of reflection in teacher education [Paper presentation]. 13th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.628.6365&rep=rep1&type=pdf
46.
KrauseM. (2010). Performative Akte als Momente der Inhaltskonstitution im Musikunterricht [Performative acts as moments of content constitution in music lessons]. In VogtJ.RolleC.HeßF. (Eds.), Inhalte des Musikunterrichts: Sitzungsbericht 2009 der Wissenschaftlichen Sozietät Musikpädagogik (pp. 78–100). LIT.
47.
Krause-BenzM. (2013). “‘Hier wird Musik gemacht!’ Reflexionen über das Musizieren im Musikunterricht” [‘This is where music is made!’ Reflections on making music in the music classroom]. Diskussion Musikpädagogik, 59, 55–59.
48.
Krause-BenzM. (2016a). Handlungsorientierung: Zwischen Praktizismus und Performativität [Action orientation: Between practicism and performativity]. In Lehmann-WermserA. (Ed.), Musikdidaktische Konzeptionen: Ein Studienbuch (pp. 83–96). Wißner.
49.
Krause-BenzM. (2016b). Perspektiven musikkultureller Vielfalt: Musizieren mit heterogenen Gruppen als performativer Akt [Perspectives on music-cultural diversity: Making music with heterogeneous groups as a performative act]. In BradlerK. (Ed.), Vielfalt im Musizierunterricht: Theoretische Zugänge und praktische Anregungen (pp. 107–120). Schott.
50.
Krause-BenzM. (2017). “Jetzt machen wir ’nen kleinen Auftritt . . .”: Klassenmusizieren als performativer Akt? [“Now we’re going to make a little appearance . . .”: Making music in class as a performative act?]. Diskussion Musikpädagogik, 73, 41–49.
51.
Krause-BenzM. (2018). Performativität beginnt, wenn der Performer nicht mehr über seine Performance verfügt: Verunsicherung als musikpädagogisch relevante Dimension des Performativen [Performativity begins when the performer no longer has control over their performance: Insecurity as a dimension of the performative that is relevant to music education]. In HeßF.OberhausL.RolleC. (Eds.), Zwischen Praxis und Performanz: Zur Theorie musikalischen Handelns in musikpädagogischer Perspektive: Sitzungsbericht 2017 der Wissenschaftlichen Sozietät Musikpädagogik (pp. 31–48). LIT.
52.
Kruse-WeberS.GorzelaM. (2019). Herausforderungen musikpädagogischen Handelns in einer diversifizierten Gesellschaft: Zur theoretischen Fundierung eines Begriffs künstlerischer Praxis am Beispiel des offenen Ensembles Meet4Music an der Kunstuniversität Graz [Challenges of Music Education in a Diversified Society: Theoretical Foundation of a Concept of Artistic Practice using the Example of the Open Ensemble Meet4Music at the Graz University of the Arts]. In K. Ahringer, C. Utz, & T. Wozonig (Hrsg.), Musik im Zusammenhang. Festschrift Peter Revers zum 65. Geburtstag [Music in Context. Festschrift Peter Revers on the occasion of his 65th birthday] (S. 89–108). Hollitzer Verlag.
53.
Kruse-WeberS.HadjiN. (2020). Reflective Practice in der Hochschullehre [Reflective Practice in higher education]. In HummelS. (Hrsg.), Grundlagen der Hochschullehre. Teaching in Higher Education (S. 109–137). Springer Fachmedien.
54.
Kruse-WeberS.SariT. (2019). Learning to reflect: Enhancing instrumental music education majors’ practice through reflective journals. In GiesS.Helge SaetreJ. (Hrsg.), Becoming Musicians: Student involvement and teacher collaboration in higher music education (S. 127–150). NMH publications.
55.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2015). You gotta fight the power: The place of music in social justice education. In BenedictC.SchmidtP. K.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 406–419). Oxford University Press.
56.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
57.
LermanL.BorstelJ. (2003). Liz Lerman’s critical response process: A method for getting useful feedback on anything you make, from dance to dessert. Dance Exchange.
58.
MerschD. (1997). Ereignis und Aura: Zur Dialektik von ästhetischem Augenblick und kulturellem Gedächtnis [Event and aura: On the dialectics of the aesthetic moment and cultural memory]. Musik & Ästhetik, 1(3), 20–36.
59.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2019). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
60.
PhelanH. (2012). Sonic hospitality: Migration, community, and music. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 2, pp. 168–184). Oxford University Press.
61.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
62.
RädikerS.KuckartzU. (2019). Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA [Analysis of qualitative data with MAXQDA]. Springer VS.
63.
SawyerR. K. (2011). What makes good teachers great?: The artful balance of structure and improvisation. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press.
64.
SchiavioA.van der SchyffD.GandeA.Kruse-WeberS. (2019). Negotiating individuality and collectivity in community music. A qualitative case study. Psychology of Music, 47(5), 706–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618775806
65.
SchiavioA.BiasuttiM.van der SchyffD.ParncuttR. (2020a). A matter of presence: A qualitative study on teaching individual and collective music classes. Musicae Scientiae, 24(3), 356–376.
66.
SchiavioA.StupacherJ.ParncuttR.TimmersR. (2020b). Learning music from each other. Synchronization, turn-taking, or imitation?Music Perception, 37(5), 403–422.
67.
SchiavioA.KüssnerM.WilliamonA. (2020c). Music teachers’ perspectives and experiences of ensemble and learning skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00291
68.
SchippersH.BartleetB. (2013). The nine domains of community music: Exploring the crossroads of formal and informal music education. International Journal of Music Education, 31(4), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413502441
69.
SchmidtC. (2013). Auswertungstechniken für Leitfadeninterviews [Evaluation techniques for guided interviews]. In FriebertshäuserB.LangerA.PrengelA. (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 473–486). Beltz Juventa.
70.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.
71.
SchönD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
72.
SilvermanM. (2009). Sites of social justice: Community music in New York City. Research Studies in Music Education, 31(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X09344384
73.
SmallC. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Wesleyan University Press.
SmildeR. (2012). Lifelong learning among musicians. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 2, pp. 289–303). Oxford University Press.
78.
TurinoT. (2008). Music as social life: The politics of participation. University of Chicago Press.
79.
van der SchyffD.SchiavioA.ElliottD. (2016). Critical ontology for an enactive music pedagogy. Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 15(5), 81–121. https://doi.org/10.22176/act15.5.81
80.
van der SchyffD.SchiavioA.ElliottD. J. (2022). Musical bodies, musical minds. Enactive cognitive science and the meaning of human musicality. MIT Press.
81.
VeblenK. K. (2008). The many ways of community music. International Journal of Community Music, 1(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm.1.1.5/1
82.
VeblenK. K.MessengerS. J.SilvermanM.ElliottD. J. (2013). Community music today. Rowman & Littlefield.
VogtJ. (1999). David J. Elliotts “praxiale” Theorie der Musikerziehung: Versuch einer kritischen Annäherung [David J. Elliott’s “praxial” theory of music education: Attempt at a critical approach]. Musik & Bildung, 31(3), 38–43.
85.
VogtJ. (2012). Musikalische Bildung—Ein lexikalischer Versuch [Musical education: A lexical attempt]. [Review of the book Music matters: A new philosophy of music education, by D. J. Elliott]. Zeitschrift für kritische Musikpädagogik, 2012, 1–26.
86.
WengerE.McDermottR.SynderW. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press.
87.
WesterlundH.ParttiH.KarlsenS. (2015). Teaching as improvisational experience: Student music teachers’ reflections on learning during a bi-cultural exchange project. Research Studies in Music Education, 37(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X15590698
88.
WulfC.ZirfasJ. (2007). Pädagogik des Performativen: Theorien, Methoden, Perspektiven [Pedagogy of the performative: Theories, methods, perspectives]. Beltz.
