The culture of competition in music education is pervasive, reflecting the overall growth in standardization and accountability measures in education. With this study, I addressed the intersection of two underexamined topics in music education: teachers’ experience with competitive ensemble events and the structural challenges of working in a low-income, student of color (SOC) majority campus. In this basic qualitative study, I examined how instrumental music teachers navigate the high-stakes policy of an adjudicated large-ensemble contest within and beyond their classrooms. Research questions include the following: (a) What do teachers perceive to be the unique challenges they face in preparing for and participating in ensemble adjudication as a result of their context in a low-income, SOC-majority campus? (b) How does preparation and participation ensemble adjudication influence teaching and learning in instrumental music classrooms? (c) What do teachers perceive to be the function and justification for compulsory ensemble adjudication? Findings suggest that teachers working in these contexts experience unique challenges in preparing for and succeeding in adjudication events due to the intersection of campus-based challenges and policy. In addition, music teachers experience similar narrowing of content and heightened stress as their general education counterparts within accountability structures.
AdamsL. M.PadullaJ. J.MadausG. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers’ opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory Into Practice, 42, 18–29. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/41406/pdf
2.
AuW. (2010). The idiocy of policy: The anti-democratic curriculum of high-stakes testing. Critical Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v1i1
3.
BakerR. A.Jr. (2012). The effects of high-stakes testing policy on arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 113, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.626384
4.
BalletK.KelchtermansG. (2008). Workload and willingness to change: Disentangling the experience of intensification. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701516463
5.
BalletK.KelchtermansG.LoughranJ. (2006). Beyond intensification towards a scholarship of practice: Analysing changes in teachers’ work lives. Teachers and Teaching, 12(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500467415
ClarkeM.ShoreA.RhoadesK.AbramsL.MiaoJ.LiJ. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from interviews with educators in low-, medium-, and high-stakes states. Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
8.
Costa-GiomiE.ChappellE. (2007). Characteristics of band programs in a large urban school district: Diversity or inequality?Journal of Band Research, 42(2), 1–18.
EasthopeC.EasthopeG. (2000). Intensification, extension, and complexity of teachers’ workload. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690095153
11.
EscalanteS. (2019). When does race matter in music education? An exploration of race, racial hegemony, and predominantly Latinx secondary music programs through the theory of racial formation [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas]. UNT Digital Library. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1609151/m1/2/
12.
ForbesG. W. (1994). Evaluative music festivals and contests—Are they fair?Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 12(2), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512339401200203
13.
FordT. G.Van SickleM. E.ClarkL. V.Fazio-BrunsonM.SchweenD. C. (2017). Teacher self-efficacy, professional commitment and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy, 31, 202–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815586855
14.
GerrardC. L. (2018). “It’s more than playing music”: Perceptions of a concert band program from members of a predominantly Latino school community [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLink Electronic Theses & Dissertation Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1524211163607595
15.
GonzalezA.PetersM. L.OrangeA.GrigsbyB. (2017). The influence of high-stakes testing on teacher self-efficacy and job-related stress. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47, 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1214237
HashP. M. (2012). An analysis of the ratings and interrater reliability of high school band contests. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411434932
18.
HashP. M. (2013a). An analysis of middle/high school band and orchestra festival ratings. Journal of Band Research, 49(1), 1–20.
19.
HashP. M. (2013b). Large-group contest ratings and music teacher evaluation: Issues and recommendations. Arts Education Policy Review, 114, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2013.826035
20.
HoffmanJ. V.AssafL. C.ParisS. G. (2001). High-stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow?The Reading Teacher, 54, 482–492. www.jstor.org/stable/20204940
21.
HowardS. A. (2012). The effect of selected nonmusical factors on adjudicators’ ratings of high school solo vocal performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412444610
22.
KvaleS. (2007). Doing interviews. SAGE.
23.
LeCompteM. D.SchensulJ. J. (2010). Designing and conducting ethnographic research: An introduction. AltaMira Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
24.
LevinsonB. A. U.SuttonM. (2001). Introduction: Policy as/in practice—A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In LevinsonB. A. U.SuttonM. (Eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 1–22). Ablex.
25.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
26.
LoweG. M. (2018). Competition versus cooperation: Implications for music teachers following students’ feedback from participation in a large-scale cooperative music festival. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n5.6
27.
MartinL. D. (2014). An exploratory study of music teacher evaluation practices in multiple states with Race to the Top funding: K-12 music educators’ experiences, perspectives, and recommendations [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Colorado Boulder]. CU Scholar. https://scholar.colorado.edu/mued_gradetds/3
28.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
29.
O’LearyE. J. (2016). Characteristics of communities with Bands of America Grand National Finalists: 2001–2013. Journal of Band Research, 51(2), 56–66.
30.
O’LearyE. J. (2019). A phenomenological study of competition in high school bands. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 220, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.220.0043
31.
ParkerE. C. (2015). Investigating selective practices in high school choral ensembles: An intrinsic case study. In CampbellM. R.ThompsonL. K. (Eds.), Analyzing influences: Research on decision making and the music education curriculum (pp. 127–147). Information Age.
32.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
33.
PopeD. A. (2013). Influence of primary performance area, education level, and performance quality on pre-service music teachers’ ratings of string orchestra performances. String Research Journal, 4, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/194849921300300404
34.
PopeD. A.BarnesG. V. (2015). Influence of education, performance level, and presentation medium on evaluations of string orchestra performances. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 203, 7–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.203.0007
35.
PowellS. R. (2021). Competition, ideology, and the one-dimensional music program. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education.
36.
RawlingsJ. (2019). Benefits and challenges of large-ensemble instrumental music adjudicated events: Insights from experienced music teachers. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318777824
37.
RobinsonJ. A. (2021). So many expectations: A study of Australian early-career secondary school music teachers.Research Studies in Music Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X211009328
38.
RobinsonM. (2008). From competition to collaboration: Lessons from the Second Chair. Research Studies in Music Education, 30(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X08097510
39.
RooneyE. (2015). “I’m just going through the motions”: High-stakes accountability and teachers’ access to intrinsic rewards. American Journal of Education, 121, 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/681923
40.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.
SpringerD. G.BradleyK. D. (2018). Investigating adjudicator bias in concert band evaluations: An application of the Many-Facets Rasch Model. Musicae Scientiae, 22, 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864917697782
43.
SternJ. (2021). Correlations between socioeconomic status and scores at a marching band contest. Journal of Band Research, 56(2), 1–12.
TuckerO. G. (2020). “Everybody is good enough”: Band teacher agency in a highly competitive environment [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas]. UNT Digital Library. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1707234/
ValenciaR. R. (2000). Inequalities and the schooling of minority students in Texas: Historical and contemporary conditions. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986300224005
49.
Vasquez HeiligJ.Darling-HammondL. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The process and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75–110. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708317689
