How we listen to music and respond to its media and contexts has changed significantly since the invention of sound recording. Today’s musicians have countless opportunities to listen to others’ interpretations given the vast availability of past and contemporary repertories through the global reach of recordings. This study investigated the extent to which the growing archive of recordings provides a valuable resource for performers’ creativity. Although musical performance is a particularly porous domain for influence through either deliberate or spontaneous assimilation of expressive variation from other aural sources, little empirical research exists on influence in performance and specifically on the influence of recordings. Qualitative data were obtained via an online questionnaire to identify how and in what ways the use and influence of recordings have changed over the course of classical performers’ training or professional careers. Respondents’ (N = 130) comments were analysed using a thematic inductive approach. The emerging themes reveal an overall increased level of use of recordings now relative to the past, a largely positive contribution of recordings in shaping musical development, including the role of recordings in self-regulated learning, a largely positive attitude to the influence of others’ interpretations, a means of developing expressions of self-identity in relation to others and a route to acquiring a more critical and discerning mode of listening to recordings. Implications for music education are discussed in terms of how listening to recordings, in both formal and informal learning contexts, could support advanced musicians’ learning through trial and error, enhance creative insight, strengthen self-efficacy, foster metacognitive skills and nurture individuality.
AlessandriE. (2014). The notion of expression in music criticism. In FabianD.TimmersR.SchubertE. (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across styles and cultures (pp. 22–33). Oxford University Press.
2.
AraújoM. V. (2016). Measuring self-regulated practice behaviours in highly skilled musicians. Psychology of Music, 44, 278–292.
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
4.
BayleyA. (2010). Recorded music: Performance, culture and technology. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BloomH. (1973). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry. Oxford University Press.
6.
BornG. (2009). Afterword: Recording: From reproduction to representation to remediation. In CookN.ClarkeE.Leech-WilkinsonD.RinkJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to recorded music (pp. 286–304). Cambridge University Press.
7.
BornG. (2010). Listening, mediation, event: Anthropological and sociological perspectives. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 135, 79–89.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
9.
BullM. (2005). No dead air! The iPod and the culture of mobile listening. Leisure Studies, 24, 343–355.
10.
ChaffinR.ImrehG.LemieuxA.ChenC. (2003). Seeing the big picture: Piano practice as expert problem solving. Music Perception, 20, 465–490.
11.
ClarkeE. (2012). Creativity in performance. In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 17–30). Oxford University Press.
ColomboB.AntoniettiA. (2017). The role of metacognitive strategies in learning music: A multiple case study. British Journal of Music Education, 34, 95–113.
14.
CookN. (2012). Beyond creativity? In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 451–459). Oxford University Press.
15.
CookN. (2013). Beyond the score: Music as performance. Oxford University Press.
16.
CookN.ClarkeE.Leech-WilkinsonD.RinkJ. (2009). The Cambridge companion to recorded music. Cambridge University Press.
17.
CookN.SappG. (2007). Purely coincidental? Joyce Hatto and Chopin’s Mazurkas. CHARM Newsletter, 3, 1–3.
18.
CreechA.HallamS. (2017). Facilitating learning in small groups: Interpersonal dynamics and task dimensions. In RinkJ.GauntH.WilliamonA. (Eds.), Musicians in the making: Pathways to creative performance (pp. 57–74). Oxford University Press.
19.
CreechA.PapageorgiI.DuffyC.MortonF.HaddonE.PotterJ.De BezenacC.WhytonT.HimonidesE.WelchG. (2008). Investigating musical performance: Commonality and diversity among classical and non-classical musicians. Music Education Research, 10, 215–234.
20.
DavidsonJ. (1997). The social in musical performance. In HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (Eds.), The social psychology of music (pp. 209–228). Oxford University Press.
21.
DavidsonJ.McPhersonG. (2017). Learning to perform: From gifts and talents to skills and creative engagement. In RinkJ.GauntH.WilliamonA. (Eds.), Musicians in the making: Pathways to creative performance (pp. 7–27). Oxford University Press.
22.
DeliègeI.SlobodaJ. (Eds.). (1996). Musical beginnings: Origins and development of musical competence. Oxford University Press.
23.
DeNoraT. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
24.
ElverdamB.Brock-NannestadG. (2008, September11–13). How musicians use recordings in discourse and praxis in the perspective of an anthropological dynamic concept of culture [Conference session]. Centre for the History and Analysis of Recorded Music (CHARM) Symposium 6: Playing with Recordings (pp. 1–10). Royal Holloway, University of London. http://www.charm.rhul.ac.uk/about/symposia/p7_12.html
25.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
26.
FabianD. (2014). Commercial sound recordings and trends in expressive music performance: Why should experimental researchers pay attention? In FabianD.TimmersR.SchubertE. (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across styles and cultures (pp. 58–79). Oxford University Press.
27.
FabianD. (2015). A musicology of performance: Theory and method based on Bach’s solos for violin. Open Book Publishers.
28.
FabianD.TimmersR.SchubertE. (2014). Introduction. In FabianD.TimmersR.SchubertE. (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across styles and cultures (pp. xxi–xxx). Oxford University Press.
29.
FlynnM. (2016). Accounting for listening: How music streaming has changed what it means to listen. Journal of Media Studies and Popular Culture (Issue on: Musical and Media Connectivities: Practices, Circulation, Interactions), 6, 36–59.
30.
GadamerH.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed., WeinsheimerJ.MarshallD. G., Trans. and revised). Continuum.
31.
GauntH. (2017). Apprenticeship and empowerment: The role of one-to-one lessons. In RinkJ.GauntH.WilliamonA. (Eds.), Musicians in the making: Pathways to creative performance (pp. 28–56). Oxford University Press.
32.
GauntH.WesterlundH. (Eds.). (2013). Collaborative learning in higher education. Ashgate.
33.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.
34.
GioiaD.CorleyK.HamiltonA. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.
35.
HallamS. (1995). Professional musicians’ approaches to the learning and interpretation of music. Psychology of Music, 23, 111–128.
36.
HallamS. (2006). Music psychology in education. Institute of Education, University of London.
37.
HargreavesD. J.HargreavesJ. J.NorthA. C. (2012). Imagination and creativity in music listening. In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 156–172). Oxford University Press.
38.
KatzM. (2004). Capturing sound: How technology changed music. University of California Press.
39.
KingE.PriorH. (2013). Music and familiarity: Listening, musicology and performance. Routledge.
40.
Leech-WilkinsonD. (2012). Compositions, scores, performances, meanings. Music Theory Online, 18, 1–17.
41.
Leech-WilkinsonD. (2016). Classical music as enforced utopia. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 15, 325–336.
42.
LisboaT.WilliamonA.ZicariM.EiholzerH. (2005). Mastery through imitation: A preliminary study. Musicae Scientiae, 9, 75–110.
43.
McManusL. (2014). Playing by ear. Listening games in the music history classroom. Journal of Music History Pedagogy, 5, 23–39.
44.
McPhersonG.McCormickJ. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34, 322–336.
45.
McPhersonG.ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective on developing performance skills. In ColwellR.WebsterP. R. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning: Volume 2 – Applications (pp. 130–175). Oxford University Press.
46.
NielsenS. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: A study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32, 418–431.
47.
PapageorgiI.CreechA.HaddonE.MortonF.De BezenacC.HimonidesE.PotterJ.DuffyC.WhytonT.WelchG. (2010). Perceptions and predictions of expertise in advanced musical learners. Psychology of Music, 38, 31–66.
48.
RinkJ.GauntH.WilliamonA. (Eds.). (2017). Musicians in the making: Pathways to creative performance. Oxford University Press.
49.
RitchieL.WilliamonA. (2011). Measuring distinct types of self-efficacy. Psychology of Music, 39, 328–344.
50.
ShevockD. (2018). The experience of confident music improvising. Research Studies in Music Education, 40, 102–116.
51.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A.MooreD. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 287–309.
52.
SmartT.GreenL. (2017). Informal learning and musical performance. In RinkJ.GauntH.WilliamonA. (Eds.), Musicians in the making: Pathways to creative performance (pp. 108–125). Oxford University Press.
53.
SterneJ. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Duke University Press.
54.
VarelaW.AbramiP. C.UpitisR. (2016). Self-regulation and music learning: A systematic review. Psychology of Music, 44, 55–74.
55.
VarvarigouM. (2017). Promoting collaborative playful experimentation through group playing by ear in higher education. Research Studies in Music Education, 39, 161–176.
56.
VoliotiG. (2010). Playing with tradition: Weighing up similarity and the buoyancy of the game. Musicae Scientiae, 14, 85–114.
57.
VoliotiG. (2017). Musing on the past: Historical recordings as creative resources for performance. In MackieC. (Ed.), New thoughts on piano performance: Research at the interface between science and art (pp. 65–83). London International Piano Symposium Publication.
58.
VoliotiG.WilliamonA. (2017). Recordings as learning and practising resources for performance: Exploring attitudes and behaviours of music students and professionals. Musicae Scientiae, 21, 499–523.
59.
WilliamonA.ClarkT.KüssnerM. (2017). Learning in the spotlight: Approaches to self-regulating and profiling performance. In RinkJ.GauntH.WilliamonA. (Eds.), Musicians in the making: Pathways to creative performance (pp. 206–221). Oxford University Press.
60.
WilliamonA.ThompsonS.LisboaT.WiffenC. (2006). Creativity, originality and value in music performance. In DeliègeI.WigginsG. (Eds.), Musical creativity: Current research in theory and practice (pp. 161–180). Psychology Press.
