Perceptual Learning Style theory (PLS) claims that the presentation of information in either a visual, auditory or kinaesthetic format will improve the learning of selected individuals due to the dominance of one or more modality in their information gathering. The modality dominance of six Western classical pianists in higher music education was explored through observing their practising in four different situations totalling 80 minutes, and conducting interviews with them in a stimulated-recall protocol after each observation. The observation and interview data were analysed to 1) identify patterns in individuals’ approaches to learning new musical material from scores, to 2) identify differences between the individuals, and to 3) relate these differences to the predictions of PLS. Thirteen behavioural categories were identified that differentiated the pianists, but these could not be convincingly linked to PLS. The findings of the study question the applicability of the theory to musical practising.
BarbeW. B.SwassingR. H. (1979). Teaching through modality strengths: Concepts and practices. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Bloser.
2.
BeheshtiS. (2009). Improving studio music teaching through understanding learning styles. International Journal of Music Education, 27, 107–115.
3.
CahnD. (2008). The effects of varying ratios of physical and mental practice, and task difficulty on performance of a tonal pattern. Psychology of Music, 36, 179–191.
4.
CalissendorffM. (2006). Understanding the learning style of pre-school children learning the violin. Music Education Research, 8, 83–96.
5.
ChaffinR.ImrehG.CrawfordM. (2002). Practicing perfection: Memory and piano performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Grounded Theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 19, 418–427.
7.
DunnR. E. (2008). The effect of auditory, visual or kinesthetic perceptual strengths on music listening. Contributions to Music Education, 35, 47–78.
8.
EverettY. U. (1997). Modality-based aural skills pedagogy: Ear-training strategies for post-tonal and non-western musics. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 11, 27–58.
9.
FlemingN. D. (2006a). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies (2nd ed.). Christchurch, New Zealand: Neil D. Fleming.
10.
FlemingN. D. (2006b). VARK questionnaire. Retrieved from www.vark-learn.com
11.
GabrielssonA. (1999). The performance of music. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 501–602). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
GabrielssonA. (2003). Music performance research at the millennium. Psychology of Music, 31, 221–272.
GaultB. (2005). Music learning through all the channels: Combining aural, visual, and kinesthetic strategies to develop musical understanding. General Music Today, 19, 7–9.
15.
GinsborgJ. (2004). Strategies for memorizing music. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 121–141). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
GrusonL. M. (1988). Rehearsal skill and musical competence: Does practice make perfect? In SlobodaJ. A. (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 91–112). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
HallamS. (1995). Professional musicians’ approaches to the learning and interpretation of music. Psychology of Music, 23, 111–128.
18.
HallamS. (2001). The development of metacognition in musicians: Implications for education. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 27–39.
19.
HannafordC. (1995). Smart moves: Why learning is not all in your head. Arlington, VA: Great Ocean Publishers.
20.
HighbenZ.PalmerC. (2004). Effects of auditory and motor mental practice in memorized piano performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 159, 58–67.
21.
HultbergC. (2008). Instrumental students’ strategies for finding interpretations: complexity and individual variety. Psychology of Music, 36, 7–23.
22.
ImrehG.CrawfordM. (2002). In the words of the masters: Artists’ account of their expertise. In ChaffinR.ImrehG.CrawfordM. (Eds.), Practicing perfection: Memory and piano performance (pp. 26–65). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
23.
KorenmanL.PeynirciogluZ. (2007). Individual differences in learning and remembering music: Auditory versus visual presentation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 48–64.
24.
KrätzigG. P.ArbuthnottK. D. (2006). Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 238–246.
25.
LehmannA. C.EricssonK. A. (1998). Preparation of a public piano performance: The relation between practice and performance. Musicae Scientae, 2, 67–94.
26.
Leon-GuerreroA. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used by student musicians during music practice. Music Education Research, 10, 91–106.
27.
LimS.LippmanL. G. (1991). Mental practice and memorization of piano music. The Journal of General Psychology, 118, 21–31.
28.
LyleJ. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861–878.
29.
MassaroD. W. (2004). From multisensory integration to talking heads and language learning. In CalvertG. A.SpenceC.SteinB. E. (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 153–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
MiklaszewskiK. (1989). A case study of a pianist preparing a musical performance. Psychology of Music, 17, 95–109.
31.
MiklaszewskiK. (1995). Individual differences in preparing a musical composition for public performance. In ManturzewskaM.MiklaszewskiK.BialkowskiA. (Eds.), Psychology of Music Today: Proceedings of the International Seminar of Researchers and Lecturers in the Psychology of Music (pp. 138–147). Warsaw, Poland: Frederyk Chopin Academy of Music.
32.
MikszaP. (2007). Effective practice: An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of High School wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 359–375.
33.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
MillerB. A. (2002). Touch the music! Learning modalities in elementary music class. General Music Today, 15, 4–13.
35.
NielsenS. G. (1999a). Learning strategies in instrumental music practice. British Journal of Music Education, 16, 275–291.
36.
NielsenS. G. (1999b). Regulation of learning strategies during practice: A case study of a single church organ student preparing a particular work for a concert performance. Psychology of Music, 27, 218–229.
37.
NielsenS. G. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3, 155–167.
38.
NielsenS. G. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: A study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32, 418–431.
39.
OdendaalA. (2013). Perceptual learning style as an influence on the practising of instrument students in higher music education. Studia Musica, 56.
40.
OdendaalA. (2014). Solo Practising? Challenging assumptions about the role of social mediation in the practising of musicians. In ForrestD. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Society for Music Education 31st World Conference on Music Education (pp. 222–227). Victoria: International Society for Music Education.
41.
OdendaalA. (2016). (Mis)matching perceptual learning styles and practicing behavior in tertiary level Western Classical instrumentalists. Psychology of Music, 44(3), 353–368.
42.
PashlerH.McDanielM.RohrerD.BjorkR. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105–119.
43.
PaskG. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.
44.
PersellinD. C. (1992). Responses to rhythm patterns when presented to children through auditory, visual, and kinesthetic modalities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 306–315.
45.
PersellinD. C. (1994). Effects of learning modalities on melodic and rhythmic retention and on vocal pitch-matching by preschool children. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 78, 1231–1234.
46.
PersellinD. C.PierceC. (1988). Association of preference for modality to learning of rhythm patterns in music. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 825–826.
47.
RoweV. C. (2009). Using video-stimulated recall as a basis for interviews: some experiences from the field. Music Education Research, 11, 425–437.
48.
SharpleyC. F. (1984). Predicate matching in NLP: A review of research on the preferred representational system. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 238–248.
49.
SharpleyC. F. (1987). Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 103–107.
50.
SwansonC. D. (2005). The private studio: Learning styles and the voice student. Journal of Singing, 62, 203–208.
51.
ZikmundA. B.NiermanG. E. (1992). The effect of perceptual mode preferences and other selected variables on upper elementary school students’ responses to conservation-type rhythmic and melodic tasks. Psychology of Music, 20, 57–69.
