Following a music philosophy debate deriving from the 1990s, this article puts the extra-musical and social outcomes of situated music educational practices at the fore. The Swedish replica of the choir and orchestra school El Sistema, a programme globally asserting social change and social impact, appeared useful for elaborating such outcomes in practice. Following this, the present study aims to empirically elaborate musical agency as an analytical concept to understand children’s experiences, while at the same time discussing musical agency in relation to a social discursive view on practice. A Swedish El Sistema children’s string orchestra was followed for three months and the material for analysis consists of audio recordings and observation notes from lessons, performances and family events, as well as documents surrounding the activities. Constructions of discipline, empowerment and space are revealed as affecting opportunities for musical agency. The study thus elaborates on discursive constraints and opportunities for agency negotiation while discussing social outcomes with and within music education.
AllanJ. (2010). Arts and the inclusive imagination: Socially engaged arts practices and Sistema Scotland. Journal of Social Inclusion, 1(2), 111–122.
2.
AllanJ.MoranN.DuffyC.LoeningG. (2010). Knowledge exchange with Sistema Scotland. Journal of Education Policy, 25(3), 335–347.
3.
BakerG. (2014). El Sistema: Orchestrating Venezuela’s youth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BakerG. (2016). Citizens or subjects? El Sistema in critical perspective. In ElliottD.SilvermanM.BowmanW. (Eds.), Artistic citizenship: Artistry, social responsibility and ethical praxis (pp. 313–338). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BarnesB. (2000). Understanding agency: Social theory and responsible action. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
BergmanÅ.LindgrenM. (2014a). Social change through Babumba and Beethoven – musical educational ideals in El Sistema. Swedish Journal of Music Research, 96(2), 43–58.
7.
BergmanÅ.LindgrenM. (2014b). Studying El Sistema as a Swedish community music project from a critical perspective. International Journal of Community Music, 7(3), 365–337.
8.
BergmanÅ.LindgrenM. (2016). El Sistema-möjligheter och hinder för social inkludering. In SigurdssonO.SjölanderA. (Eds.), Kultur och hälsa i praktiken, (pp. 231–246). Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
9.
BergmanÅ.LindgrenM.SætherE. (2016). Struggling for integration: Universalist and separatist discourses within El Sistema Sweden. Music Education Research, 18(4), 364–375. doi: 10.1080/14613808.2016.1240765
10.
BiestaG. (2006). Bortom lärandet: demokratiskt lärande för en mänsklig framtid. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
11.
BjörckC. (2011). Claiming space: Discourses on gender, popular music, and social change. Gothenburg, Sweden: Academy of Music and Drama.
12.
BowmanW. (2006). Music, beauty, and privileged pleasures: Situating fine art and “aesthetic” experience. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 5(1), 2–22.
13.
BullA. (2016). El Sistema as a bourgeois social project: Class, gender, and Victorian values. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 15(1), 120–153.
14.
CreechA.González-MorenoP.LorenzinoL.WaitmanG. (2013). El Sistema-inspired programs: A literature review of research evaluation and critical debates. San Diego, CA: Sistema Global.
15.
CunhaR.LorenzinoL. (2012). The secondary aspects of collective music-making. Research Studies in Music Education, 34(1), 73–88.
16.
DaviesC. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. London, UK: Routledge.
17.
DeNoraT. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DeNoraT. (2003). Music sociology: getting the music into the action. British Journal of Music Education, 20(2), 165–177.
19.
DeNoraT. (2004). Historical perspectives in music sociology. Poetics, 32(3), 211–221.
20.
DeNoraT. (2011). Music-in-action: selected essays in sonic ecology. Farnham: Ashgate.
21.
DeNoraT. (2016). Music Asylums: Wellbeing through music in everyday life. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
22.
DeNoraT.AdornoT. W. (2003). After Adorno: rethinking music sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
DobsonN. (2016). Hatching plans: Pedagogy and discourse within an El Sistema-inspired music program. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 15(1), 89–119.
24.
EatockC. (2010). From Venezuela to the world: Exporting EL SISTEMA. Queen’s Quarterly, 117(4), 590–601.
25.
ElliottD. J. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
FaircloughN. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
27.
FlenaughT. C. (2012). Youth Orchestra Los Angeles (YOLA): Creating access to excellent music education for underrepresented students of color (PhD dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4gp822f1
28.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
29.
Gaztambide- FernandézR.RoseL. S. (2015). Social justice and urban music education. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 456–472). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
GouldE. (2007). Social justice in music education: The problematic of democracy. Music Education Research, 9(2), 229–240.
32.
GouldE.BartelL. (2009). Exploring social justice: How music education might matter. Canadian Music Educator, 50(4), 24–27.
33.
HesmondhalghD. (2013). Why music matters. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
34.
HollingerD. M. (2006). Instrument of social reform: A case study of the Venezuelan system of youth orchestras (PhD dissertation). Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
35.
JorgensenE. R. (2003). Transforming music education. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
36.
JorgensenE. R. (2015). Intersecting social justices and music education. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 7–28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
KarlsenS. (2011). Using musical agency as a lens: Researching music education from the angle of experience. Research Studies in Music Education, 33(2), 107–121.
38.
KarlsenS. (2012). Multiple repertoires of ways of being and acting in music: Immigrant students’ musical agency as an impetus for democracy. Music Education Research, 14(2), 131–148.
39.
KarlsenS. (2013). Immigrant students and the “homeland music”: Meanings, negotiations and implications. Research Studies in Music Education, 35(2), 161–177.
40.
KarlsenS. (2014). Exploring democracy: Nordic music teachers’ approaches to the development of immigrant students’ musical agency. International Journal of Music Education, 32(4), 422–436.
41.
KarlsenS.WesterlundH. (2010). Immigrant students’ development of musical agency – exploring democracy in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 27(3), 225–239.
42.
KuuseA-K.LindgrenM.SkåreusE. (2016).”The feelings have come home to me”– examining advertising films on the Swedish website of El Sistema. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education15(1), 187–215
43.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a democratic radical democracy politics. London, UK: Verso Books.
44.
LindgrenM. (2006). Att skapa ordning för det estetiska i skolan: Diskursiva positioneringar i samtal med lärare och skolledare. Gothenburg, Sweden: Academy of Music and Drama.
45.
LindgrenM.BergmanÅ. (2014). El Sistema som överskridande verksamhet – konstruktion av ett musikpedagogiskt forskningsprojekt. In Karlsson HäikiöT.LindgrenM.JohanssonM. (Eds.), Texter om konstarter och lärande (pp. 107–130). Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
46.
LindgrenM.BergmanÅ.SætherE. (2016). The construction of social inclusion through music education: Two Swedish ethnographic studies of the El Sistema programme. Nordisk musikpedagogiks forskning, 17, 65–81.
47.
LoganO. (2016). Lifting the veil: A realist critique of Sistema’s upwardly mobile path. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 15(1), 58–88.
48.
LorenzinoL. (2015). El Sistema in Canada: A Recent History, Part 1. Canadian Music Educator, 56(4), 18–25.
49.
LuiA. (2012). Orchestrating communities: An investigation of El Sistema and its global influences (Master’s thesis). Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
50.
NemoyL.GerryD. W. (2015). Adapting the El Sistema program to Canadian communities. Canadian Music Educator, 56(3), 8–12.
51.
NovakowskiC. (2012). El Sistema-inspired: The joy and goodness of striving towards excellence. Canadian Music Educator, 54(2), 14–17.
PhilpottC.KubiliusJ. (2015). Social justice in the English secondary music classroom. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 426–445). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
PopkewitzT. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: science, education, and making society by making the child. New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
PotterJ. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London, UK: Sage.
56.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, UK: Sage.
57.
RegelskiT. A. (2005). Music and music education: Theory and praxis for “making a difference”. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
58.
RegelskiT. A. (2016). Music, music education, and institutional ideology: A praxial philosophy of musical sociality. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 15(2), 10–45.
59.
ReimerB. (1970). A philosophy of music education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60.
ReimerB. (1991). Reimer responds to Elliott. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 2(3), 67–75.
61.
RusinekG.ArósteguiJ. (2015). Educational policy reforms and the politics of music teacher. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 78–90). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
SætherE.BergmanÅ.LindgrenM. (2017). El Sistema-musiklärare i en spänningsfylld modell för socialt inkluderande pedagogik. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 22(1–2), 9–27.
63.
SmallC. (1998). Musicking: the meanings of performing and listening. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
64.
TakayamaK. (2013). OECD, “key competencies” and the new challenges of educational inequality. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 67–80.
65.
TalbotB. C. (2013). Discourse analysis as potential for re-visioning music education. Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 12(1), 47–63.
UyM. S. (2012). Venezuela’s national music education program El Sistema: Its interactions with society and its participants’ engagement in praxis. Music and Arts in Action, 4(1), 5–21.
68.
VaugeoisL. (2009). Music as a practice of social justice. In GouldE.CountrymanJ.MortonC.RoseL. S. (Eds.), Exploring social justice: How music education might matter (pp. 2–22). Toronto, Canada: Canadian Music Educators’ Association/L’Association canadienne des musiciens éducateurs.
69.
WahlströmN. (2009). Understanding the universal right to education as jurisgenerative politics and democratic iterations. European Educational Research Journal (online), 8(4), 520–533.
70.
WetherellM. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.
71.
WetherellM. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London, UK: Sage.
72.
WetherellM. (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, 21(2), 139–166.
73.
WrightR. (2010). Sociology and music education. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
74.
WrightR. (2012). Music education and social transformation: Building social capital through music. Canadian Music Educator, 53(3), 12–13.
75.
WrightR. (2013). Thinking globally, acting locally: Informal learning and social justice in music education. Canadian Music Educator, 54(3), 33–36.
76.
WrightR. (2015). Music education and social reproduction: Breaking cycles of injustice. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 340–356). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
