The purpose of this study was to examine how four experienced music teachers describe their navigation of the micropolitical landscape in their schools. Research questions included: (a) How do the teacher participants describe their strategies used to navigate the political, contextual, and interpersonal landscape of their schools and school communities?, and (b) How do participants perceive the influence of the micropolitical landscape on their own workplace experiences as well as the classroom experiences of their students? Drawing from case study and narrative design frameworks, the study data included an email survey, an observation of each teacher, two individual interviews with each teacher, an interview with the school principal for each teacher and a focus group interview with teachers at the end of the project. Findings highlight the purposeful nature of experienced teacher micropolitical interactions.
AchinsteinB. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421–455. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00168
2.
BallS. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York, NY: Methuen.
3.
BauerW. I.ForsytheJ.KinneyD. (2009). In-service music teachers’ perceptions of professional development. In ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (Eds.), Research perspectives: Thought and practice in music education (pp. 101–123). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
4.
BeckerH. (1990). Generalizing from case studies. In EisnerE. W.PeshkinA. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education (pp. 233–242). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
5.
BlaséJ. (Ed). (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
BroskyD. (2011). Micropolitics in the school: Teacher leaders’ use of political skill and influential tactics. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(1), 1–11.
7.
ConwayC. M. (2008). Experienced music teacher perceptions of professional development throughout their careers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 176, 7–18.
8.
ConwayC. M.HibbardS.RawlingsJ. (2014). The potential use of micropolitics in examining personal and professional experiences of music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1177/1057083714539768
9.
DexterS.LaMagdeleineD. R. (2002). Dominance theatre, slam-a-thon, and cargo cults: Three illustrations of how using conceptual metaphors in qualitative research works. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(2), 362–380.
10.
ErosJ. (2009). A case study of three urban music teachers in the second stage of their teaching careers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
11.
ErosJ. (2011). The career cycle and the second stage of teaching: Implications for policy and professional development. Arts Education Policy Review, 112 (2), 65–70.
12.
HamannD. LDaughertyE.MillsC. R. (1987). An investigation of burnout assessment and potential job-related variables among public school music educators, Psychology of Music, 15, 128–140. doi: 10.1177/0305735687152002
13.
HamannD. L.GordonD. G. (2000). Burnout: An occupational hazard. Music Educators Journal, 87(3), 34–39. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3399661
14.
HestonM. L.DedrickC.RaschkeD.WhiteheadJ. (1996). Job satisfaction and stress among band directors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 319–327. doi: 10.2307/3345444
15.
HoyleE. (1986). The politics of school management. London, UK: Hodder and Stoughton.
16.
IannacconeL. (1975). Education policy systems: A study guide for educational administrators. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova University Press.
17.
IsbellD. (2008). Musicians and teachers: The social and occupational identity of music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(2), 162–178. doi: 10.1177/0022429408322853
18.
JorgensenE. R. (2011). Pictures of music education. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
KaschubM.SmithJ. (Eds.) (2015). Promising practices in 21st century music teacher education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
KelchtermansG.BalletK. (2002). Micropolitical literacy: Reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 755–767.
21.
MadsenC. K.HancockC. B. (2002). Support for music education: A case study of issues concerning teacher retention and attrition. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(1), 6–19. doi: 10.2307/3345689
22.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
MilesM.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Payne McLainB. (2005). Environmental support and music teacher burnout. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 164, 71–84.
26.
ScheibJ. W. (2002). Roles, expectations, and tension in the professional life of the school music teacher: A collective case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin- Madison.
27.
ScheibJ. W. (2003). Role stress in the professional life of the school music teacher: A collective case study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(2), 124–136. doi: 10.2307/3345846
28.
StaufferS. L. (2014). Narrative inquiry and the uses of narrative in music education research. In ConwayC. M. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of research in American music education (pp. 163–185). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
