Motivation to study music in Australian schools: The impact of music learning,gender,and socio-economic status

Abstract

This study extends an eight-country mapping exercise (McPherson & O’Neill, 2010; see Research Studies in Music Education issues 2010–2011) to include students’ motivation to study music within the Australian context. It sought to determine whether music learners (students learning an instrument or voice), might be more motivated to study academic subjects at school, and whether gender and socio-economic status (SES) affected student motivation to learn music at school. A total of 2,727 students from grades 5 to 12 completed a questionnaire based on Eccles and Wigfield’s expectancy-value framework. Data collected included: ratings of competence beliefs, interest, importance, usefulness and difficulty for music, English, maths, and science; indications of whether the students were currently learning a musical instrument or voice (music learners); and whether they would like to if given the opportunity. There was an overall significant decline in competence beliefs, interest, importance, and usefulness across the school years, in contrast with increased task difficulty ratings across the school years. Music learners reported significantly higher competence beliefs, interest, importance, usefulness, and less task difficulty than non-music learners. This advantage applied across all school grades for music, competence beliefs for English in upper primary and lower secondary school grades, and for maths in lower secondary grades. Although females reported music as more important and useful than males, their competence beliefs and task difficulty ratings were equivalent. Music was considered slightly less interesting for females than for males. The value of music as a subject declined significantly for upper SES students from upper primary to lower secondary schools. The greatest number of participants (40.8%) who expressed a desire to learn a musical instrument came from the lower SES category in upper primary school. This is an important result in the Australian context, indicating that this may be a positive time to recruit learners. This study provides new information regarding the relationship between motivation and desire to learn a musical instrument across school grades, gender, and socio-economic factors.

Keywords

competence beliefs cross-cultural comparisons expectancy-value theory motivation music education school subjects self-beliefs socio-economic status task difficulty values

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACARA. (2011a). Guide to understanding ICSEA. Sydney, Australia: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

ACARA. (2011b). Shape of the Australian curriculum: The arts. Sydney, Australia: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

ACARA. (2013a). The Foundation – Year 10 Australian curriculum: Arts. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/arts.html

ACARA. (2013b). National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html

Cabanac

Perlovsky

Bonniot-Cabanac

M.-C.

Cabanac

(2013). Music and academic performance. Behavioural Brain Research, 256, 257–260.

Costa-Giomi

(2012). Music instruction and children’s intellectual development: The educational context of music participation. In Macdonald

R. A. R.

Kreutz

Mitchell

(Eds.), Music, health and wellbeing (pp. 339–355). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Costa-Giomi

Chappell

(2007). Characteristics of band programs in a large urban school district: Diversity or inequality? Journal of Band Research, 42(2), 1–18.

Dwyer

C. M.

(2011). Reinvesting in arts education: Winning America’s future through creative schools. Washington, DC: President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities.

Eccles

J. S.

(2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In Ellliot

A. J.

Dweck

C. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford.

10.

Eccles

J. S.

O’Neill

S. A.

Wigfield

(2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task values in adolescents and children. In Moore

K. A.

Lippman

(Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 237–249). New York, NY: Springer.

11.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

12.

Elpus

Abril

C. R.

(2011). High school music students in the United States: A demographic profile. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 128–145.

13.

Ewing

(2010). The Arts and Australian education: Realising potential. In ACER (Ed.), Australian Education Review no. 58. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

14.

Feldman

A. F.

Matjasko

J. L.

(2007). Profiles and portfolios of adolescent school-based extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Adolescence, 30(2), 313–332.

15.

Gonzalez-Moreno

P. A.

(2010). Student’s motivation to study music: The Mexican context. Research Studies in Music Education, 32(2), 185–199. doi:10.1177/1321103x10384211

16.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Barron

K. E.

Pintrich

P. R.

Elliot

A. J.

Thrash

T. M.

(2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645.

17.

Jacobs

J. E.

Lanza

Osgood

D. W.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527.

18.

Kinney

D. W.

(2010). Selected demographic variables, school music participation and achievement test scores of urban middle school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 334–350.

19.

Martin

A. J.

Mansour

Anderson

Gibson

Liem

G. A. D.

Sudmalis

(2013). The role of arts participation in students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes: A longitudinal study of school, home and community factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 709–727.

20.

McPherson

G. E.

(2006, May). What research tells us about the meaning of music and music making. Paper presented at the Beijing International Forum on Music Education 2006: A dialogue of research and policy development, Chinese International Exhibition Centre, Beijing, PRC.

21.

McPherson

G. E.

O’Neill

S. A.

(2010). Students’ motivation to study music as compared to other school subjects: A comparison of eight countries. Research Studies in Music Education, 32(2), 101–137. doi:10.1177/1321103X10384202

22.

Nabb

D. B.

(1995). Music performance program enrollment and course availability for educationally disadvantaged versus non-educationally disadvantaged high school students in Texas (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from UMI Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 9529936)

23.

O’Neill

S. A.

(2005). Youth music engagement in diverse contexts. In Mahoney

J. L.

Larson

R. W.

Eccles

J. S.

(Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 255–274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

24.

Parliament of Victoria. (2013). Inquiry into the extent, benefits and potential of music education in Victorian schools. Parliament of Victoria Education and Training Committee. Victoria, Australia: Victorian Government Printer.

25.

Pascoe

Leong

MacCallum

Mackinlay

Marsh

Smith

Winterton

(2005). National review of school music education: Augmenting the diminished. Barton, Australia: Australian Government.

26.

Rickard

N. S.

Bambrick

C. J.

Gill

(2012). Absence of widespread psychosocial and cognitive effects of school-based music instruction in 10–13 year old students. International Journal of Music Education, 30(1), 57–78.

27.

Schluchter

M. D.

Elashoff

J. D.

(1990). Small-sample adjustments to tests with unbalanced repeated measures assuming several covariance structures. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 37, 69–87.

28.

Wigfield

O’Neill

S. A.

Eccles

J. S.

(Eds.). (1999). Children’s achievement values in different domains: Developmental and cultural differences. Albuquerque, NM: Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.