This article presents excerpts from a case study describing Angelica Dawson, a New York State music educator. Angelica makes improvisation a central part of her curricula in ways that transcend traditional offerings prevalent in American public schools. Qualitative research methods were used to document Angelica’s work over the course of an academic year at a rural public school in New York State. Data collection utilized ethnographic techniques including interviews, observations and informal conversations. Data analysis employed interpretive coding guided by a constant comparative approach. Analysis revealed challenges posed by teaching improvisation in the school music context, including: conflicts with tradition; conflicts with the expectations of colleagues, parents, students, and administrators, and standing apart from the prevailing practices of colleagues. Angelica’s story suggests that teachers who break from traditional pedagogical practices face profound challenges and feelings of isolation.
AllsupR. E. (2008). Creating an educational framework for popular music in public schools: anticipating the second-wave. Visions of Research in Music Education, 12, 1–12.
2.
AlpersonP. (1984). On musical improvisation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43(1), 17–29.
3.
AzzaraC. D. (1992). The effect of audiation-based improvisation techniques on the music achievement of elementary instrumental music students (Doctoral dissertation). Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 9223853)
4.
AzzaraC. D. (2002). Improvisation. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), New handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 171–187). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BartelL. R.RadocyR. E. (2002). Trends in data acquisition and knowledge development. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), New handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the music educators national conference (pp. 707–729). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BenedictC. (2006). Chasing legitimacy: The US National Music Standards viewed through a critical theorist framework. Music Education Research, 8(1), 17–32.
7.
BitzM. E. (1998). A description and investigation of strategies for teaching classroom music improvisation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 9909407)
8.
BoeijeH. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quantity & Quality, 36, 391–409.
9.
BrophyT. (1999). The melodic improvisation of children ages six through twelve: A developmental perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 9906615)
10.
BurnardP. (2000). Examining experiential differences between improvisation and composition in children’s music-making. British Journal of Music Education, 17(3), 227–245.
11.
ByoS. J. (1999). Classroom teachers’ and music specialists’ perceived ability to implement the National Standards for music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(2), 111–123.
12.
CampbellP. S. (2009). Learning to improvise music, improvising to learn music. In SolisG.NettlB. (Eds.), Musical improvisation (pp. 119–142). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
13.
CarterW. L. (1986). Jazz pedagogy: A history still in the making. Jazz Educators Journal, 18(3), 10–13.
ConwayC. (2008). The implementation of the national standards in music education: Capturing the spirit of the standards. Music Educators Journal, 94(4), 34–39.
16.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, UK: SAGE.
17.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RichG. (1997). Musical improvisation: A systems approach. In Keith SawyerR. (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 43–66). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
18.
DaviesC. (1986). Say it till a song comes (reflections on songs invented by children 3–13). British Journal of Music Education, 3(3), 279–293.
19.
DavisS. G. (2012). Instrumental ensemble learning and performance in primary school. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of music education (pp. 417–436). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
FlohrJ. (1979). Musical improvisation behavior of young children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Pro Quest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 8009033)
22.
FreundlichD. A. (1978). The development of musical thinking: Case studies in improvisation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 7909893)
23.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2008). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (3rd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
24.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York, NY: Longman.
25.
GoodrichA. M. (2005). Inside a high school jazz band (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3166103)
26.
GoodrichA. M. (2007). Peer mentoring in a high school jazz ensemble. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(2), 94–114.
27.
GreenL. (2008). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
28.
GregoryJ. K. (1995). Improvisation and integration of the arts at the Pecs Free School of Arts in Hungary (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 9617466)
29.
HargreavesD. J. (1996). The development of artistic and musical competence. In DeliegeI.SlobodaJ. (Eds.), Musical beginnings: Origins and development of musical competence (pp. 146–170). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
HebertD. G. (2005). Music competition, cooperation, and community: An ethnography of a Japanese school band (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3163382)
31.
HebertD. G. (2009). Musicianship, musical identity and meaning as embodied practice. In RegelskiT.GatesJ. T. (Eds.), Music education for changing times: Guiding visions for practice (pp. 39–55). New York, NY: Springer Press.
32.
HeimonenM. (2004). Music and arts schools: Extra-curricular music education in Sweden: A comparative study. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 3(2), 1–35.
33.
HickeyM. (2009). Can improvisation be taught? A call for free improvisation in our schools. International Journal of Music Education, 27(4), 285–299.
KratusJ. (1991). Orientation and intentionality as components of musical activity. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 2, 4–8.
37.
KratusJ. (1996). A developmental approach to teaching music improvisation. International Journal of Music Education, 26, 27–38.
38.
KuzmichJ. A. (1991). Into the future: Are we ready for the ‘90s?Jazz Educators Journal, 22, 22–23.
39.
LeavellB. K. (1996). “Making the change”: Middle school band students’ perspectives on the learning of musical-technical skills in jazz performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 9638480)
40.
LehmanP. (1995). The national standards for music education: Meeting the challenges. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 5–15.
41.
LewisG. E. (2000). Teaching improvised music: An ethnographic memoir. In ZornJ. (Ed.), Arcana: Musicians on music (pp. 78–109). New York, NY: Granary Books.
42.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
43.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
MacLeanL.MechthildM.EstableA. (2004). Improving accuracy of transcripts in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 113–123.
45.
McPhersonG. E. (1993). Factors and abilities influencing the development of visual, aural and creative performance skills in music and their educational implications (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 9317278)
46.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
MoorheadG. E.PondD. (1977). Music of young children. Santa Barbara, CA: Pillsbury Foundation for the Advancement of Music Education.
48.
MrozR. W. (1982). Investigating curriculum planning practices for the cultivation of individual creative potentialities in secondary school instrumental music in selected school districts of Erie county (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 8303092)
49.
MurphyD. (1994). Jazz studies in American schools and colleges: A brief history. Jazz Educators Journal, 26(3), 34–38.
50.
New York State Education Department. (2009). The New York State school report card. Albany: New York State Education Department. Retrieved from http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/reportcard/
51.
OliverD.SerovichJ.MasonT. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84(2), 1273–1289.
52.
OrmanE. K. (2002). Comparison of the National Standards for music education and elementary music specialists’ use of class time. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 155–1264.
53.
PignatoJ. M. (2010). An analysis of practical challenges posed by teaching improvisation: Case studies in New York state schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. 3430429)
54.
ProutyK. E. (2002). From Storyville to state university: The intersection of academic and non-academic learning cultures in post-secondary jazz education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT3078870)
55.
ReeseJ. W. (2006). Definitions of improvisation: Perspectives of three elementary general music teachers (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 1440086)
56.
RegelskiT. (2002). On “methodolatry” and music teaching as “critical” and reflective praxis. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 10(2), 102–124.
57.
Rosabal-CotoG. (2010). Music education for social change in the secondary schools of Costa Rica. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 9(3), 55–81.
58.
SarathE. (2002). Improvisation and curriculum reform. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), New handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 188–198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
SawyerR. K. (2000). Improvisational cultures: Collaborative emergence and creativity in improvisation. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(3), 180–185.
60.
SawyerR. K. (2001). The improvisational performance of everyday life. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2(2), 149–162.
61.
SawyerR. K. (2008). Learning music from collaboration. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 50–59.
62.
SchoppS. E. (2006). A study of the effects of National Standards for Music Education, number 3, improvisation and number 4, composition on high school band instruction in New York State (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3225193)
63.
SchwandtT. A. (2007). The dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
64.
SeidmanI. E. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
65.
SnyderR. L. (1994). College jazz education during the 1960s: Its development and acceptance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations Database. (Publication No. AAT929176)
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich College Publishers.
68.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
69.
SzegoC. K. (2002). Music transmission and learning: A conspectus of ethnographic research in ethnomusicology and music education. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), New handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 707–729). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70.
TillyC. (1990). How (and what) are historians doing?American Behavioral Scientist, 33(6), 685–711.
71.
VäkeväL. (2006). Teaching popular music in Finland: What’s up, what’s ahead? International Journal of Music Education, 24, 126–131.
72.
VeblenK. K. (1991). Perceptions of change and stability in the transmission of Irish traditional music: An examination of the music teacher’s role (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 9123871)
73.
Ward-SteinmanP. (2007). Confidence in teaching improvisation according to the K-12 achievement standards: Surveys of vocal jazz workshop participants and undergraduates. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 172, 25–44.
74.
WhitcombR. L. (2005). Descriptions of improvisational activities in elementary general music classrooms in the state of Illinois (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3199172)
75.
WigginsJ.EspelandM. (2012). Creating in music learning contexts. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of music education (pp. 341–360). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76.
WitmerR.RobbinsJ. (1988). An historical and critical survey of recent pedagogical materials for the teaching and learning of jazz. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 96, 7–29.
77.
WrightR.KanellopoulosP. (2010). Informal music learning, improvisation and teacher education. British Journal of Research in Music Education, 21(1), 71–87.
78.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
