As a part of a larger international mapping exercise to examine students’ motivation to study music as compared to other school subjects, this article draws upon data from a sample of 3037 students in the USA to observe perceptions of values, competence and interest in music study (in school versus outside of school) among music learners and non-music learners. Students were grouped into three grade levels: (a) 6, (b) 7—9, and (c) 10—12. Music learners in the USA had significantly higher motivational profiles for music and some other school subjects as compared to non-music learners. Music interest inside of school was ranked significantly lower than for any other subject, while music interest outside of school was ranked second highest for any subject in grades 6 and 7—9, and highest of all subjects in grades 10—12. This article addresses cultural and contextual issues in the USA to consider how music advocates might better demonstrate the importance and usefulness of music study as an academic course. Practical recommendations include encouraging a broader emphasis beyond performance and competition, and promoting opportunities for autonomous music learning within the school setting.
Austin, J.R. ( 1998). Comprehensive musicianship research: Implications for addressing the national standards in music ensemble classes. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 17(1), 25-32.
2.
Central Intelligence Agency. (2009). The world factbook: Field listing - literacy. Retrieved 6 May 2009, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2103.html
3.
Clark, S. ( 2005). Mariachi music as a symbol of Mexican culture in the United States. International Journal of Music Education, 23, 227-237.
4.
College Board. (2008). Music theory course description: May 2009, May 2010. Retrieved 7 May 2009, from http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap08_music_coursedesc.pdf
5.
Eccles (Parsons), J.S., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors . In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
6.
Eccles, J.S., Wigfeld, A., & Schiefele, U. ( 1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1017-1055). New York: Wiley.
7.
Fehr, R. C. (Ed.). (2009). MENC Today: News and information for music educators. Music Educators Journal, 95(3), 10-21.
8.
Geer, B.L. ( 2009). Imaginings: A solid investment for tight times. Music Educators Journal, 95(3), 8-9.
9.
Hargreaves, D.J., & Marshall, N.A. (2003). Developing identities in music education. Music Education Research, 5, 263-274.
10.
Hartley, L.A., & Porter, A.M. ( 2009). The influence of beginning instructional grade on string student enrolment, retention, and music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 370-384.
11.
Hendricks, K.S. ( 2009). Relationships between the sources of self-efficacy and changes in competence perceptions of music students during an All-State Orchestra event. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
12.
Hendricks, K.S. ( 2010). Investing time: Teacher research observing the influence of music history and theory lessons upon student engagement and expressive performance of an advanced high school string quartet. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 184, 65-78.
13.
Jorgensen, E.R. ( 2003). Transforming music education. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
14.
Lehman, P.R. ( 2000). The power of the National Standards for music education . In B. Reimer (Ed.), Performing with understanding: The challenge of the National Standards for music education (pp. 3-10). Washington: MENC.
15.
Livermore, J., & McPherson, G.E. (1998). Expanding the role of the arts in the curriculum: Some Australian initiatives. Arts Education Policy Review, 99(3), 10-15.
16.
Mahlmann, J.J. ( 1993). Calling a halt to the marginalization of the arts. Teaching Music, 1(3), 48-49.
17.
Mayday Group. (2009). Action ideals. Retrieved 15 June 2009 from http://www.maydaygroup.org/php/actionideals.php.
18.
Menc, the National Association for Music Education. (1996). Performance standards for music: Strategies and benchmarks for assessing progress toward the national standards, Grades PreK-12. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
19.
Miller, D.C., Sen, A., Malley, L.B., & Burns, S.D. ( 2009). Comparative indicators of education in the United States and other G-8 countries: 2009. (NCES2009-039). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US, Department of Education.
20.
North, A.C., & Hargreaves, D.J. (1999). Music and adolescent identity . Music Education Research, 1, 75-92.
21.
Organizing for America. (n.d.). BarackObama.com: Education. Retrieved 11 May 2009, from http://www.barackobama.com/issues/education/#k-12
22.
Radocy, R.E. ( 2001). North America. In D. J. Hargreaves & A. C. North (Eds.), Musical development and learning: The international perspective (pp. 120-133). London: Continuum.
23.
Reimer, B. (Ed.). (2000). Performing with understanding: The challenge of the National Standards for music education . Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
24.
Reimer, B. ( 2004). Reconceiving the standards and the school music program . Music Educators Journal, 91(1), 33-37.
25.
Schmid, W. ( 2000). Challenging the status quo in school performance classes . In B. Reimer (Ed.), Performing with understanding: The challenge of the national standards for music education (pp. 45-58). Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
Swanson, C.B. ( 2009). Cities in crisis 2009: Closing the graduation gap. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education. Retrieved 6 May 2009, from http://www.americaspromise.org/Our-Work/Dropout-Prevention/~/media/Files/Our%20Work/Cities_In_Crisis_Report_2009.ashx
28.
US Census Bureau. (2009). Population estimates. Retrieved 1 May 2009, from http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html
29.
US Department of Education. (2009a). $44 billion in stimulus funds available to drive education reforms and save teaching jobs. Retrieved 11 May 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2009/04/04012009.html
30.
US Department of Education. (2009b). U.S. secretary announces budget that advances reform while cutting waste. Retrieved 11 May 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2009/05/05072009a.html
31.
US Department of Education. (n.d.). No child left behind. Retrieved 6 May 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=ln
32.
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Digest of Education Statistics, 2001 . Retrieved 1 May 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002130.pdf
33.
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Commissioner’s statement: Participation in education. Retrieved 1 May 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/statement/s2.asp
34.
US Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration. (2008). Employment related provisions in state compulsory school attendance laws - January 1, 2009. Retrieved 1 May 2009, from http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/state/schoolattend.htm
35.
White House Blog Post. (2009). Taking on education. Retrieved 11 May 2009, from http://www.white-house.gov/blog/09/03/10/Taking-on-Education/
