Across Canada, the arts disciplines - dance, drama, music and visual arts - are integral to the school curriculum. However, there is neither a consensus on the knowledge and instructional skills required of practitioners to effectively implement arts lessons, nor agreement on approaches to teaching the arts in teacher education and professional development programs. In this paper, I discuss a policy Delphi undertaken for the purpose of developing a curricular image for the arts in a faculty of education. My motivation for this study derives from previous research which indicates that effectively designed and delivered arts education programs can enhance teachers' confidence and willingness to the arts in their own classrooms. Findings from this study indicate that elementary teachers need a level of comfort with the arts to teach them. They require the expertise to apply generic instructional skills in the arts, a desire to play and experiment with artistic processes, an appreciation of the importance of the arts, and an understanding of basic arts concepts. Specialist secondary arts teachers should foster creativity in their classrooms. They require expertise in two arts disciplines and a broad knowledge of the others, an understanding of outcomes-based learning and how to organize appropriate activities, and an ability to motivate and inspire young people to participate in the arts. Teacher educators need to re-focus the arts curriculum to emphasize personal expertise, comfort level, creativity, experimentation, and conceptual knowledge across the arts disciplines. Professional development programs in the arts should emphasize outcomes-based learning, generic instructional strategies, integration, and assessment strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, S., Ball, S., & Murphy, R. (1975). Encyclopaedia of educational evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Andrews, B.W. (1995). Redesigning the arts curriculum of teacher education: A collaborative approach. Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 36(7), 33-39.
3.
Andrews, B.W. (1997a). A right to passage: Music certification through stakeholder involvement. Canadian Music Educator, 39(1), 19-22.
4.
Andrews, B.W. (1997b). Assessing the effectiveness of a collaborative approach to program delivery in arts teacher education. McGill Journal of Education, 32(2), 163-176.
5.
Andrews, B.W. (1999). Side by side: Evaluating a partnership program in arts teacher education. International Electronic Journal of Leadership and Learning, 3(16), www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/.
6.
Andrews, B.W. (2000a). Curricular reference points for changing teacher practices in arts education. In B. Gregory (Ed.), Music of the spheres. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Education Bi-Annual Conference (pp. 456-461). Edmonton, AB: International Society for Music Education .
7.
Andrews, B.W. (2000b). ArtsSmarts evaluation results, Year 2: Report on the findings. Report for the Canadian Conference of the Arts. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa.
8.
Andrews, B.W. (2001). ArtsSmarts evaluation results, Year 3: Report on the findings. Report prepared for the Canadian Conference of the Arts. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa.
9.
Andrews, B.W. (2004). Re-play: Re-assessing the effectiveness of a collaborative approach to program delivery in arts teacher education. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
Arts Curriculum Centre (1989). Needs assessment survey. North York, ON: North York Board of Education.
11.
Arts Education Council of Ontario (1991, June). Action plan for teacher education. Paper formulated by the Teacher Education Committee, Arts Education Council of Ontario Annual General Meeting, Oakville, Ontario.
12.
Arts Education Partnership. (2001). Strengthening state-level arts education partnerships. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
13.
ARTS, Inc. and Performing Tree. (2000). Profiles of national models of arts and school connections. Los Angeles, CA: ARTS, Inc.
14.
Bae, J.H. (2004). Learning to teach visual arts in an early childhood classroom: The teacher's role as a guide. EarlyChildhood Education Journal, 31(4), 247-254.
15.
Baker, D. W. (Ed.). (1985). Teachers in the arts: Proceedings of a National Symposium. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
16.
Barnes, S. (1987). The effect of class voice instruction and differential song material on vocal performance, vocal knowledge, and attitude of elementary education majors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(9), 2270A.
17.
Barry, N.H. (1992). Music and education in the elementary music methods class. Journal ofMusic Teacher Education, 2(1), 16-23.
18.
Barrington, G.V. (1986). The Delphi as a naturalistic evaluation tool. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 1, 81-88.
19.
Blair, S., & Uhl, N. (1993). Using the Delphi method to improve the curriculum . The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 23(3), 107-128.
20.
Bennett, B.L. (1987). A look at field experiences for preservice teachers in the arts. Design for Arts in Education, 2(1), 16-23.
21.
Boberg, A.L., & Morris-Khoo, S.A. (1993). The Delphi method: A review of the methodology and an application in the evaluation of a higher education program. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 7(1), 27-39.
22.
Brand, M., & Dolloff, L. (2002). Fantasies and other romanticized concepts of music teaching: A cross-cultural study of Chinese and North American music education students' image of music teaching. International Journal of Music Education, 39, 17-30.
23.
Bresler, L. (1994). Music in a double-bind: Instruction by non-specialists in elementary schools. Arts Education Policy Review, 95(3), 30-36.
24.
Cobert, C.B. (1984). Status of the visual arts in early education. Arts Education, 37(4), 28-31.
25.
Cookson, P.S. (1986). Charting the unknown: Delphi and policy Delphi strategies for international cooperation. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 5, 3-13.
26.
Courtney, R. (1985, August). Rehearsing for life: Teaching drama teachers . Paper presented at the Meeting of the Children's Theatre Association of America, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED263634).
27.
Dorn, C., & Jones, L. (1988). Promoting partnerships in arts education: Teachers, artists and scholars. In J.T. McLaughlin (Ed.), Toward a new era in arts education (pp. 80-90). New York: American Council for the Arts.
28.
Eisner, E. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education , 18(4), 375-385.
29.
Elliott, D.J. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
Elliott, D.J. (1998). Musical diversity and music education: Principles and practices. Canadian Music Educator, 39(2), 11-16.
31.
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516-525.
32.
Fullan, M. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 12-17.
33.
Forum for Arts and Media Education (1985). Teacher education in the arts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.
34.
Gates, J.T. (1995). Arts teacher education reform: Recruiting a new profession. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(3), 34-39.
35.
Glasgow, R.B. (1961). A study and evaluation of an in-service training class in music for elementary teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 22, 1519-1620.
36.
Gokhale, A.A. (2001). Environmental initiative prioritization with a Delphi approach: A case study. EnvironmentalManagement, 28(2), 187-193.
37.
Goldberg, M. (2001). Utilizing community resources. In M. Goldberg, Arts and learning: An integrated approach to teaching and learning in multicultural and multilingual settings (pp. 206-208). New York, NY : Addison-Wesley Longman.
38.
Graham, L.F., & Milne, D.L. (2003). Developing basic training programmes: A case study illustration using the Delphi method in clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology andPsychotherapy, 10(1), 55-63.
39.
Green, J.P., & Vogan, N.F. (1991). Music education in Canada: A historical account . Toronto, ON: University of Toronto .
40.
Gregory, M.K. (1995). Collaboration for music teacher education between higher education institutions and K-12 schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(1), 47-59.
41.
Gupta, U.G., & Clarke, R.E. (1996). Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975-1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(2), 185-211.
42.
Gurney, P.J., & Andrews, B.W. (1998). Building bridges: A case study of policy development in teacher education. In A. Richardson (Ed.), International multiculturalism: Preparing together for the 21st century (pp. 182-193). Edmonton, AB: Kanata Learning.
43.
Gurney, P.J., & Andrews, B.W. (2000). Restructuring faculties of education: State of the nation. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 4(1) www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/.
44.
Helmer, O. (1983). Looking forward: A guide to futures research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hennessy, S. (2000). Overcoming the red-feeling: the development of confidence to teach music in primary school amongst student teachers. British Journal of Music Education, 17(2), 183-196.
47.
Holsapple, C.W., & Joshi, K.D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Strategic InformationSystems, 9(2-3), 235-261.
48.
Jillson, I.A. (1975). The national drug abuse policyDelphi: Progress report and findings to date. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and application (pp. 124-159). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
49.
Kennedy, H.P. (2004). Enhancing Delphi research: Methods and results . Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(5), 504-511.
50.
Lathrop, R.L., & Boyle, J.D. (1972). Interdisciplinary model program in the arts for children and teachers: An interim report on the arts impact project. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 29, 1-8.
51.
Lehman, P., & Sinatra, R. (1988). Assessing arts curricula in the schools: Their role, content and purpose. In J. T. McLaughlin (Ed.), Toward a new era in arts education (pp. 53-79). New York, NY: American Council for the Arts.
52.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
Maranzano, C. (2000). Music teacher performance evaluation: A call for more inclusive models. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(3), 267-274.
54.
Martino, J.P. (2003). A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(8), 719-733.
55.
McLaughlin, J.T. (1985). A program of staff development for the use of arts in education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University. (University Microfilms International No. 8528041).
56.
McLaughlin, J. T. (Ed.). (1988). Toward a new era in arts education. New York, NY: American Council for the Arts.
57.
Montgomery, A. (1995). The importance of music teaching competencies as rated by elementary classroom teachers and university methods instructors . Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 36(7), 19-26.
58.
Morin, F.L. (1994). A professional development model for planned change in arts education. Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education , 35(7), 17-28.
59.
Olson, G. (1987). Partnership and process: Excerpts from the Report of the Task Force on Music Teacher Education for the Nineties. Music Educators Journal, 73(6), 51-55
60.
Phillips, K., & Vispoel, W. (1990). The effects of class voice and breath-management instruction on vocal knowledge, attitudes, and vocal performance among elementary education majors. The Quarterly, 1(1 & 2), 96-105.
61.
Pitman, W. (1998). Learning the arts in an age of uncertainty. Toronto, ON: Arts Education Council of Ontario.
62.
Plummeridge, C. (1999). Aesthetic education and the practice of music teaching. British Journal of Music Education, 16(2), 115-122.
63.
Reid, S. (2001). Music today in Ontario boards. Survey of superintendents of curriculum and superintendents of human resources. The Recorder, 43(2), 32-33.
64.
Regelski, T.A. (1998). Schooling for musical praxis. Canadian Music Educator, 40(1), 32-43.
65.
Reynolds, A. (1992). What is a competent beginning teacher? A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 1-35.
66.
Robinson, K. (1991). Keynote address: ArtsWork conference. Canadian Society for Education ThroughArt Journal, 34(2), 15-17.
67.
Sackman, H. (1975). Delphi critique. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
68.
Scheibe, M., Skutsch, M., & Schofer, J. (1975). Experiments in Delphi methodology. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff, The Delphi method: Techniques and applications . Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley .
69.
Shepherd, J., & Vulliamy, G. (1983). A comparative sociology of school knowledge. Journal of Sociology of Education, 4(1), 3-18.
70.
Smithrim, K., & Upitis, R. (2001). Strong poets: Teacher education and the arts. Journal of ProfessionalStudies, 9(1), 19-29.
71.
Somers, K., Baker, G., & Isbell, C. (1984). How to use the Delphi technique to forecast training needs. Performance and Instruction Journal, 23, 26-28.
72.
Stake, R. (1993). Arts teacher education: Custom and cherishing; improvisation and adaptation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 117, 76-91.
73.
Stubley, E. (2000). The great divide: Classical versus popular music. TheCanadian Music Educator, 42(2), 5, 13.
74.
Takacs, C. (1978). Measuring the impact of an in-service workshop on elementary teachers' self-perceptions as aesthetic educators. Contributions to MusicEducation, 6, 38-48.
75.
Tambling, P. (1999). Opera, education and the role of arts organisations . British Journal of Music Education, 16(2), 139-156.
76.
Thiessen, D., & Pike, R. (1992). Image of the future teacher. Report prepared for the Teacher Education Council of Ontario. Toronto, ON: Teacher Education Council of Ontario.
77.
Uhl, N.P. (1983). Using the Delphi technique in institutional planning . In N. P. Uhl (Ed.), Using research for strategic planning: New Directions of Institutional Research , 37 (pp. 81-94). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
78.
Upitis, R., Smithrim, K., & Soren, B. (1999). When teachers become musicians and artists: Teacher transformation and professional development. Music Education Research, 1(1), 23-25.
79.
Upitis, R., Patteson, A., Harris, E., & Poth, C. (2004, May). Program features leading to sustainable teacher development in the arts. Paper presented in the ARTS Special Interest Group at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
80.
Van Zolingen, S.J., & Klassen, C.A. (2003). Selection processes in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(4), 317-340.
81.
Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1996). Drawing ourselves into teaching: Studying the images that shape and distort teacher education. Teaching andTeaching Education, 12, 303-313.
82.
Wilkinson, J.H., Emerson, J., Guillaumant, D., Mergler, J., & Waddington, J. (1992). Preservice arts teacher education in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Arts Education Council of Ontario.
83.
Wilson, M. (1994). Integrated arts: Roles and relationships with the new Common Curriculum in the transition years for the province of Ontario . The Artspaper, 4(3), 12-14.
84.
Wing, L. (1993). Music teacher education: Coming to our senses . Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education , 117, 51-6.
