The purpose of this study was to explore university students' attributions of sources of influence on their Perceived Control beliefs in relation to solo performance in music. Drawing on data collected in semi-structured interviews, the paper outlines three principal sources of influence; assessment, previous performance experiences, and significant others (most particularly the peer group and the solo performance tutor). Students described a variety of ways in which these sources of influence were believed to shape and inform how they view themselves in terms of ability, confidence and work-rate, and the paper explores the significance of these attributions for those involved in the delivery and management of music programmes in the higher education sector. Attention is drawn in particular to the contrasting experiences of musicians from varying traditions and genres of music, and to the highly significant influence of the peer group upon self-perception as a performer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cannatella, H. (2001). Art assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 319-26.
2.
Chapman, M., Skinner, E.A., & Baltes, P.B. (1990). Interpreting correlations between children's perceived control and cognitive performance: Control, agency, or means-ends beliefs?Developmental Psychology, 26, 246-253.
3.
Cizek, G.J. (2000). Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(2), 16-23,33.
4.
Clary, E.G., & Thieman, T.J. (2002). Coping with academic problems: An empirical examination of Brickman et al.'s models of helping and coping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 33-59.
5.
Daniel, R. (2001). Self-assessment in performance. British Journal of Music Education, 18(3), 215-226.
6.
Davidson, J.W. (2002). The solo performer's identity. In R. A. R. MacDonald, D. J. Hargreaves & D. Miell (Eds.), Musical Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Dweck, C., & Reppucci, N. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 25, 109-116.
8.
Dweck, C.S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674-685.
Hammarberg, A., & Hagekull, B. (2000). Pre-school teachers' perceived control and intention to act regarding child behaviour problems. Early Child Development and Care, 160, 155-166.
11.
Hewitt, A. (2003). The development and influence of perceived control beliefs in undergraduate music students' experience of solo performance assessment . Presented at the Research in Music Education Conference, University of Exeter, April 2003 .
12.
Jeanneret, M. (1993). The preparation of secondary music teachers in New South Wales: Is it out of step?British Journal of Music Education, 10, 47-55.
13.
Kagan, D.M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419-469.
14.
Lane, J., & Lane, A. (2001). Self-efficacy and academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 29(7), 687-694.
15.
Lehman, P.R. (1997). Assessment and grading. Teaching Music, 5(3), 58-59.
16.
MacDonald, R.A.R., Hargreaves, D.J., & Meill, D. (2002). Musical identities. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
17.
Martens, R., & Dochy, F. (1997). Assessment and feedback as student support devices . Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(3), 257-73.
18.
McCormick, J., & McPherson, G. (2003). The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychology of Music, 31(1), 37-50.
19.
Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., & Lent, R.W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38.
20.
O'Neill, S.A. (2002). The self-identity of young musicians. In R. A. R. MacDonald, D. J. Hargreaves, & D. Meill (Eds.), Musical Identities (pp. 79-96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Rugutt, J.K., Ellett, C.D., & Culross, R.R. (1998). Discriminating Student Learning and Efficacy Levels in Higher Education: Contributions of Classroom Environment and Teaching and Learning Effectiveness.
22.
Searby, M., & Ewers, T. (1997). An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the school of music, Kingston University . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 371-83.
23.
Seligman, M.E. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Fransisco: W. H. Freeman .
24.
Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22-32.
25.
Skinner, E.A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., & Connell, J.P. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(2-3).
26.
Stoever, S.A. (2002). Multiple predictors of college success: Investigation of an empirical model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.
27.
Wells, R. (1998). The student's role in the assessment process. Teaching Music, 6(2), 32-33.
