This paper employs poststructuralist concepts of the `canon' and the `other', in combination with the Critical Discourse Analysis tools of ideology, discourse and binary opposition to demonstrate how world music is constructed in music education. Data was obtained from a semi-structured interview with a Queensland government secondary school music teacher. The analysis reveals an ideology of difference underpinning a number of binary oppositions constructed between world music and European music in relation to their surrounding cultures, musical functions, pedagogies and placements in the curriculum. Some of these categories are contested when overlapped with discourses of `familiarity' and `accessibility'. Consequently, world music is shown to be marginalised in the curriculum as the `other' in relation to the dominant `canon' of European music. These findings highlight the potential of Critical Discourse Analysis for new insights into music education research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anstey, M. (1993). Quantitative and interpretive analyses of classroom talk as a cognitive context for learning about literacy. Doctor of Philosophy , Griffith University, Brisbane , Australia.
2.
Bergeron, K., & Bohlman, P. (1992). Disciplining music: Musicology and its canons . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Board of Senior Secondary School Studies. ( 1995). Music senior syllabus. Brisbane: Board of Secondary School Studies.
4.
Boyer-White, R. (1988). Reflecting cultural diversity in the music classroom . Music Educators Journal, 75(4), 50-54.
5.
Colwell, R. (Ed.), (1992). Handbook of research on music teaching and learning. New York: Schirmer Books.
6.
Cook, N. (2000). Music: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
8.
Fairclough, N. (1985). Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal ofPragmatics, 9, 739-763.
Foucault, M. (1991). Space, knowledge, and power. In C. Robinson (Ed.), The Foucaul t reader: An introduction to Foucault's thought (pp. 239-256). London: Penguin Books.
11.
Garofalo, R. (1993). Whose world, what beast: The transnational music industry, identity, and cultural imperialism. The World of Music, 25(2), 16-31.
12.
Gee, J. ( 1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
13.
Giroux, H. (1988). Postmodernism and the discourse of educational criticism. Journal of Education, 170(3), 5-28.
14.
Goldsworthy. (1989). The musical principles and procedures in the non western world. International Journal of Music Education, 14, 14-23.
15.
Gruhn, W. (1999). Music education in postmodernism: About the difficulties to move knowledge into action, theory into practice. International Journal of Music Education, 34, 57-63.
16.
Hammersley, M. (1997). On the foundations of Critical Discourse Analysis . Language & Communication, 17(3), 237-248.
17.
Kramer, L. (1996). Classical music and postmodern knowledge. California: University of California Press.
18.
Luke, A. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis. Review of Research in Education , 21, 3-48.
19.
Mills, S. (1995). Discontinuity and postcolonial discourse. ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 26(3), 73-88.
20.
Moon, B. (1992). Literary terms: A practical glossary. Cottesloe, WA: Chalkface.
21.
Neuman, W. (1997). Social research method: Quantitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
22.
Nzewi, M. (1999). Strategies for music education in Africa: Towards a meaningful progression from tradition to modern. International Journal of Music Education, 33, 72-87.
23.
Purvis, T., & Hunt, A. (1993). Discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 44(3), 473-499.
24.
Rajan, G., & Mohanram, R. (1995). Postcolonial discourse and changing cultural contexts: Theory and criticism. London: Greenwood Press.
25.
Reavis, C. (1990). Utilising curriculum, classroom practice, culture and climate. NASSP Bulletin, 74(529), 39-43.
26.
Research project: Cultural diversity in music education. World music centre. Available: http://www.worldmusiccentre.lokv.nl/wmcresconclusions.htm [2001.
27.
Rowe, D. (1998). Examining teacher talk: Revealing hidden boundaries for curricular change. Language Arts, 75(2), 103-107.
28.
Roylance, P. (1995). Transgressing the official: A critique of the affiliations between musical representations of culture and curriculum. Research Studies in Music Education, 4, 39-47.
29.
Said, E. (1985). Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.
30.
Shehan Campbell, P. (1988). World music's windows to cross-cultural understanding . Music Educators Journal, 75(3), 22-26.
31.
Shehan Campbell, P. (1992). Introducing multicultural/multiethnic music education to the school curriculum. NASSP Bulletin, 76(544), 36-41.
32.
Silverman, D. (1997). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice . London: Sage Publications.
33.
Stevens, R. (2000). Perspectives in music education research: Where are we twenty years on? A review of Australian music education research for the period 1978-1997. Research Studies in Music Education , 14, 61-75.
34.
Teo, P. ( 2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7-49.
35.
Thompson, K. (1998). World music in the school curriculum. Bachelor of Education (Honours), Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
36.
Tucker, J. (1992). Circling the globe: Multicultural resources. Music Educators Journal, 78(9), 37-40. van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249-283.
