Conservation policies often criminalize indigenous practices when state and global norms disregard local cosmologies. This study examines Lamalera, an indigenous whaling community in Indonesia, whose ancestral system Ola Nuâng Lefa Nué, a moral-ecological law regulating whale harvests, conflicts with national bans and international biodiversity regimes. The research identifies a normative and epistemic gap between technocratic conservation and customary law rooted in reciprocity and restraint. Using a critical qualitative case study with fieldwork (2023–2025), interviews, and legal hermeneutics, it analyzes how customary, Church, and state laws intersect within unequal power structures. Findings reveal that Indonesia’s conservation law embodies discriminatory legal pluralism. It recognizes custom only under state control. Yet Lamalera’s living law fulfills principles of sustainable commons governance. The study proposes inclusive legal mediation: co-management, recognition, and FPIC, to reconcile conservation and indigenous rights, showing that governing through difference offers a more just and sustainable path for marine biodiversity conservation.
AurA .WidianarkoY. B.DewiY. T. N. (2023). Social-ecological values and practices of indigenous whale fishing community in Lamalera, East Nusa Tenggara. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 23(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v23i1.4879
2.
BarnesR. H. (1997). Sea hunters of Indonesia: Fishers and weavers of Lamalera. Clarendon Press.
3.
BataonaA. O. P. T. (2001). Masyarakat Nelayan Lamalera dan Tradisi Penangkapan Ikan Paus [The Lamalera fishing community and the tradition of whale hunting]. Lembaga Gelekat Lefo Tanah.
4.
BedingA. (2008). Pater Bernhard Bode, SVD Rasul Pulau Lembata [SVD Rasul Pulau Lembata [SVD Apostles of Lembata Island]]. Lamalera.
5.
BensJ. (2024). Revisiting forum shopping: Navigating normative pluralism, navigating sentiments. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 56(3), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2024.2419226
6.
BerkesF. (2017). Environmental governance for the anthropocene? social-ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning. Suistainability, 9(7), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071232
7.
BermanP. S. (2020). Global legal pluralism (BermanP. S., Ed.). Oxford.
BlaserM. (2013). Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270
10.
BogadóttirR.OlsenE. S. (2017). Making degrowth locally meaningful: The case of the Faroese grindadrap. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.2458/v24i1.20888
11.
CarruthersD. V. (2008). Environmental justice in Latin America? Global and conceptual challenges. In CarruthersD. V. (Ed.), Environmental justice in Latin America (pp. 25–75). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7676.003.0001
De Sousa SantosB. (2020). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization, and emancipation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427
14.
ForsythT.JohnsonC. (2014). Elinor Ostrom’s legacy: Governing the commons and the rational choice controversy. Development and Change, 45(5), 1093–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12110
HardinG. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859). https://doi.org/0.1126/science.162.3859.1243
19.
HockingB. A. (2002). Placing indigenous rights to self-determination in an ecological context. Ratio Juris, 15(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00203
20.
LelaonaY. A. (2016). Dari Laut Menuju Tuhan [From the Sea to God]. Kanisius.
21.
MamzerH. M. (2021). Ritual slaughter: The tradition of pilot whale hunting on the Faroe islands. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, Article 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.552465
22.
Ministerial of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Decree. (2014). Keputusan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan No. 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Kawasan Konservasi Perairan Nasional Laut Sawu Dan Sekitarnya Di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur [Ministerial Decree of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries No. 5 of 2014 on the National Marine Conservation Area of the Sawu Sea and Surrounding Waters in East Nusa Tenggara Province].
23.
MooreS. F. (1973). Law and social change: The semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review, 7(4), 719–746. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967
24.
OstromE. (2011). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. In AltC. S. J. E.NorthD. C.BarzelY.BatesR.CoxG. W.LewinL.LibecapG.McCubbinsM. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200964.n32
25.
PapillonM.RodonT. (2020). The transformative potential of indigenous-driven approaches to implementing free, prior and informed consent: Lessons from two Canadian cases. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 27(2), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02702009
SingletonB. E. (2016). Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: Ordering Faroese pilot whaling. Journal of Political Ecology, 23(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.2458/v23i1.20178
29.
TamanahaB. Z. (2017). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. In Del MarM. (Ed.), Legal theory and the social sciences: Volume II (pp. 447–483). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091891-17
30.
TamanahaB. Z. (2021). Legal pluralism explained. Oxford University Press.
31.
TaumY. Y.BaryadiI. P. (2024). Exploring the cultural space of the Lamalera fishing community in Lembata Island, Indonesia. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 5(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v5i1.898
32.
TaumY. Y.SunartiS.Rahmawati SyahrulN.Atisah NurM.KembarenE. S. (2024). The death of the youngest Lamafa: Love and the struggle for survival of whale hunters in Lamalera. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 13(3), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.21463/jmic.2024.13.3.09
33.
TrialfhiantyT. I.QuinnC. H.BegerM. (2025). Engaging customary law to improve the effectiveness of marine protected areas in Indonesia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 261, 107543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107543
34.
TurnerB.WiberM. G. (2023). Legal pluralism and science and technology studies: Exploring sources of the legal pluriverse. Science Technology and Human Values, 48(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211069659
35.
United Nations. (2007). United nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 61/295, adopted 13September2007.
36.
von Benda-BeckmannK.TurnerB. (2018). Legal pluralism, social theory, and the state. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674
37.
von Benda-BeckmannnF.von Benda-BeckmannnK. (2006). The dynamics of change and continuity in plural legal orders. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(53–54), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756597
38.
WenzelG. W. (2009). Canadian Inuit subsistence and ecological instability—if the climate changes, must the Inuit?Polar Research, 28(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v28i1.6103
