This paper explores the role of kitsch in urban planning, its influence on disintegration and redevelopment, and how kitsch influences the functionality, identity, and social dynamics of urban spaces. Using a qualitative analysis of urban planning, architecture and design documentation, together with field observations, as well as interviews with planners and residents, the analysis revealed a top-down kitsch residential mechanism in three relatively new neighborhoods that are planned, built, and populated by different groups. This mechanism is complemented by the bottom-up emergence of trendy design patterns. The most striking finding is the enormous similarity in kitsch from the planning of the neighborhood to the architecture of the buildings and apartment layouts that contrast with the differences in backgrounds of the population and locations.
AlexanderC. (1965). A city is not a tree. Ekistics, 139, 344–348.
3.
BanhamR. (2009). Los Angeles: The architecture of four ecologies. University of California Press.
4.
BenjaminW. (1934). On the mimetic faculty [Über das mimetische Vermögen]. Schocken Books.
5.
BenjaminW. (1935). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In WatsonS.BarnesA. J.BunningK. (Eds.), A museum studies approach to heritage (pp. 226–243). Routledge.
6.
BenjaminW. (1982). The author as producer. In BurginV. (Ed.), Thinking photography (pp. 15–31). Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BourdieuP. (1990). The logic of practice. Polity Press.
8.
DerridaJ. (1974). Of grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
DorflesG.McHaleJ. (1969). Kitsch: The world of bad taste. Universe Books.
10.
EcoU. (1986). Travels in hyper reality: Essays. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
11.
EcoU. (1989). The open work. Harvard University Press.
12.
GreenbergC. (1900). Avant-garde and Kitsch (1939). In HarrisonC.WoodP. (Eds.), Art in theory, 1990 (pp. 94-96). Blackwell Publishing.
13.
GurevitzD. (1997). Postmodernism: Culture and literature in the late 20th century. Dvir. (in Hebrew).
Flint AsheryS. (2020). Spatial behavior in haredi jewish communities in great britain. Springer, Cham.
16.
Flint AsheryS. (2022). Group consumption and ecological footprint: The effect of habits and lifestyle. Sustainability, 14(20), 13270.
17.
Flint AsheryS. (2023). The planning role in stretching the city: A tale of two London neighbourhoods. Springer International Publishing.
18.
Flint AsheryS.StadlerN. (2021a). Palimpsests and urban pasts: The janus-faced nature of whitechapel. Plos one, 16(9), e0251064.
19.
Flint-AsheryS.StadlerN. (2021b). Dynamics of Transcendence and Urbanism: The Latent Mechanisms of Everyday Religious Life and City Spaces. Housing, Theory and Society, 38(2), 228-251.
20.
Flint-AsheryS.StadlerN. (2024). Disorder by design: Chaos in urban transformation within Ultra-Orthodox neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2024.2408325.
21.
Flint-AsheryS.StadlerN. (2025). The Physical Geometries of Sacred Spaces:Methodological challenges in applying practice-based approaches to Study Sacred Shrines, Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research ARCH, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-09-2024-0415
22.
Flint AsheryS.SteinitzC. (2022). Issue-Based Complexity: Digitally Supported Negotiation in Geodesign Linking Planning and Implementation. Sustainability, 14(15), 9073.
HuyssenA. (2003). Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford University Press.
25.
JamesonF. (1984). The politics of theory: Ideological positions in the postmodernism debate. New German Critique, 33, 53–65.
26.
JewsiewickiB.SalamiG.VisonaM. B. (2013). A companion to modern African art. Wiley.
27.
JogendranathC. L.SarmaM. K. (2023). The commercialization butterfly: Glimpses of commerce of traditional crafts of Assam. Space and Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312231213282
28.
KampmannE. (2020). Greenberg, clement: Avant-Garde and Kitsch. In ArnoldH. L. (Ed.), Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL) (pp. 1–2). JB Metzler.
29.
MacdonaldD. (1953). A theory of mass culture. Diogenes, 1(3), 1–17.
30.
MacdonaldD. (1962). Against the American grain: Essays on the effects of mass culture. Da Capo Press.
31.
MeechamP.SheldonJ. (2013). Modern art: A critical introduction. Routledge. (Original work published 2005).
32.
OlalquiagaC. (1998). The artificial kingdom: A treasury of the kitsch experience. Bloomsbury Publishing.
33.
RibaN. (2018). Why do the new neighborhoods in Israel still look the same?Haharetz (in Hebrew).
34.
ScrutonR. (2016). Beauty and desecration. Quaestiones Disputatae, 6(2), 150–163.
35.
ShaoY.LangeE.ThwaitesK.LiuB. (2017). Defining local identity. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 5(2), 24–41.
36.
SontagS. (1969). The aesthetics of silence. In SontagS. (Ed.), Styles of radical will (p. 334). Penguin Books.
37.
SontagS. (2018). Notes on camp. Penguin Books.
38.
StadlerN.Flint-AsheryS. (2025). The complexity of architectural embodiments and ritual dynamics: An anthropo-architectural exploration of womb-tomb sanctuaries in the holy land. PLOSONE, PLOSONE-D-24-05778R1.
39.
SteadN. (2018). On the expert and the amateur in online architectural commentary. In BrisbinC.ThiessenM. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to criticality in art, architecture, and design (pp. 386–394). Routledge.
40.
StewartS. (1993). On longing: Narratives of the miniature, the gigantic, the souvenir, the collection. Duke University Press.
41.
VenturiR.BrownD. S. (2004). Architecture as signs and systems: For a mannerist time. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
