Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article explores the contemporary art ecosystem in Milan, Italy, with a focus on the interdependencies between independent art spaces and cultural institutions. It aims to understand the role of independent organizations within this ecosystem and to contribute to broader debates on urban cultural governance. We argue that the contemporary art ecosystem is structured by power dynamics, and that the very notion of independence is normative and performative, since it both reflects and shapes power relations. Drawing on two sets of empirical data collected through interviews and focus groups conducted with local key actors, we analyze the complex relationships between independent art spaces and institutions. Our findings reveal that independent art spaces are both recognized as integral parts of the ecosystem and engage in a range of strategies to either collaborate with, or maintain autonomy from, institutional actors. This study contributes to ongoing discussions on cultural production and power in contemporary urban settings. Furthermore, it addresses a gap in the literature by focusing on the relational dynamics between independent art spaces and institutions, and more broadly informs research on urban development and governance.

Keywords

cultural ecosystems contemporary art interdependencies independent cultural spaces Milan (Italy)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angelini

Castellani

(2019). Cultural and economic value: A critical review. Journal of Cultural Economics, 43(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-018-9334-4

Anselmi

Vicari

(2020). Milan makes it to the big leagues: A financialized growth machine at work. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(2), 106–124.

Bertacchini

E. E.

Borrione

(2021). Arte al futuro. Indagine su percorsi di formazione, carriere artistiche e spazi emergenti in Italia [Art in the Future. A survey of training courses, artistic careers and emerging spaces in Italy]. Centro Studi Silvia Santagata-Ebla.

Bertacchini

E. E.

Pazzola

Puletti

(2022). Urban alternative cultural production in Turin: An ecological community approach. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(3), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764221076999/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_09697764221076999-FIG6.JPEG

Berzano

Genova

(2015). Lifestyles and subcultures: History and a new perspective, lifestyles and subcultures: History and a new perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692685

Blessi

G. T.

Sacco

P. L.

Pilati

(2011). Independent artist-run centres: An empirical analysis of the Montreal non-profit visual arts field. Cultural Trends, 20(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2011.563907

Bourdieu

(1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu

(2010). Sul concetto di campo in sociologia [On the concept of field in sociology] ( Cerulo

, Ed.). Armando Editore.

Comunian

Mould

(2014). The weakest link: Creative industries, flagship cultural projects and regeneration. City, Culture and Society, 5(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCS.2014.05.004

10.

Conte

Anselmi

(2022). When large-scale regeneration becomes an engine of urban growth: How new power coalitions are shaping Milan’s governance. Environment and Planning A, 54(6), 1184–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221100828

11.

Cossu

(2022). Autonomous art institutions: Artists disrupting the creative city. Bloomsbury Publishing

12.

de Bernard

Comunian

Gross

. (2022). Cultural and creative ecosystems: A review of theories and methods, towards a new research agenda. Cultural Trends, 31(4), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2021.2004073

13.

d’Ovidio

(2015). The field of fashion production in Milan: A theoretical discussion and an empirical investigation. City, Culture and Society, 6(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.02.002

14.

d’Ovidio

(2016). The creative city does not exist. Critical essays on the creative. Ledizioni.

15.

d’Ovidio

Cossu

(2017). Culture is reclaiming the creative city: The case of Macao in Milan, Italy. City, Culture and Society, 8, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2016.04.001

16.

d’Ovidio

Pacetti

(2020). Milano, hub creativo per il sistema moda [Milan, Italy: a creative hub for the fashion industry]. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, XLII(121), 32–51.

17.

Dubini

(2018). Con la cultura non si mangia» Falso! [“You can’t eat culture” False!]. Laterza.

18.

Dumont

(2011). La rébellion du Deuxième Sexe—L’histoire de l’art au crible des théories féministes anglo-américaines (1970-2000) [The Rebellion of the second sex—Art history through the Lens of Anglo-American Feminist Theories (1970-2000)] ( Dumont

, Ed.). les presses du réel.

19.

Florida

R. L.

(2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life [Nachdr.]. Basic Books.

20.

Foot

(2001). Milan since the miracle: City, culture, and identity. Berg.

21.

Forti

Leonardi

(2021). At the border of artistic legitimation Geography, practices and models of project spaces in Milan. La Rivista di Engramma, 179, 209–228.

22.

Fucking Good Art. (2012). Art in the age of Berlusconi. Viaggio in Italia 2011. Nero, Fucking Good Art.

23.

Gibson-Graham

J. K.

(1997). The end of capitalism (as we knew it). International Affairs, 73(3), 575–576.

24.

Gielen

(2010). The murmuring of the artistic multitude global art, memory and post-fordism. open! Platform for art, culture and the public domain, Valiz.

25.

Gilmore

(2023). Culture, participation and policy in the municipal public park. Springer.

26.

Grenfell

Hardy

(2003). Field manoeuvres: Bourdieu and the Young British Artists. Space and Culture, 6(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238960

27.

Grodach

(2009). Art spaces, public space, and the link to community development. Community Development Journal, 45(4), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsp018

28.

Harvey

(1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17.

29.

Holden

(2015). The ecology of culture: A report commissioned by the arts and humanities Research Council’s Cultural Value Project. Arts & Humanities Research Council.

30.

Hutter

Throsby

(2008). Beyond price value in culture, economics, and the arts ( Hutter

Throsby

, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.

31.

Ivanova

Nestler

(2020). Art, markets, and finance. In Borch

Wosnitzer

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical finance studies (pp. 380–413). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114255

32.

Landau

(2016). Articulations in Berlin’s independent art scene: On new collective actors in the art field. International. Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(9–10), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2015-0129/FULL/PDF

33.

Le Galès

. (1998). Regulations and governance in European Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(3), 482–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00153

34.

Mar

Anderson

(2012). Urban curating: The “interspaces” of art collaboration in Western Sydney. Space and Culture, 15(4), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331212460623/FORMAT/EPUB

35.

Markusen

Gadwa

Barbour

Beyers

(2011). California’s arts and cultural ecology. The James Irvine Foundation.

36.

McRobbie

Strutt

Bandinelli

(2022). Fashion as creative economy: Micro-enterprises in London, Berlin and Milan. Wiley.

37.

Mencarelli

(2008). Conceptualizing and measuring the perceived value of an arts venue as applied to live performance. International Journal of Arts Management, 11(1), 1–34.

38.

Niessen

(2022a). Abitare il vortice: come le città hanno perduto il senso e come fare per ritrovarlo [Inhabiting the vortex: How cities have lost their meaning and how to find it again]. UTET.

39.

Niessen

(2022b). laGuida—ilContemporaneo. Gli indipendenti a Milano ai tempi della pandemia [theGuide—theContemporary. Independents in Milan during the pandemic]. cheFare.

40.

O’Brien

Rees

Taylor

(2023). Cultural governance within and across cities and regions: Evidence from the English publicly funded arts sector. European Urban and Regional Studies, 30(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764221113750/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_09697764221113750-FIG9.JPEG

41.

Pattaroni

(2020). La contre-culture domestiquée: Art, espace et politique dans la vie gentrifiée. [Domesticated counterculture: Art, space, and politics in the gentrified city]. Métis Presses.

42.

Peck

(2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.

43.

Plaza

Tironi

Haarich

S. N.

(2009). Bilbao’s art scene and the “Guggenheim effect” revisited. European Planning Studies, 17(11), 1711–1729.

44.

Poli

(2005). Il sistema dell’arte contemporanea: produzione artistica, mercato, musei [The contemporary art system: Artistic production, market, museums]. Laterza.

45.

Ponzini

Rossi

(2010). Becoming a creative city: The entrepreneurial mayor, network politics and the promise of an urban renaissance. Urban Studies, 47(5), 1037–1057.

46.

Pratt

A. C.

(2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 90(2), 107–117.

47.

Pratt

A. C.

(2010). Creative cities: Tensions within and between social, cultural and economic development: A critical reading of the UK experience. City, Culture and Society, 1(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/16/j.ccs.2010.04.001

48.

Scott

A. J.

(2014). Beyond the creative city: Cognitive–cultural capitalism and the new urbanism. Regional Studies, 48(4), 565–578. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343404.2014.891010

49.

Tien

C. C.

(2010). The formation and impact of museum clusters: Two case studies in Taiwan. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903529434

50.

Tosi

Vitale

(2011). Piccolo Nord. Scelte pubbliche e interessi privati nell’Alto Milanese [Little North: Public Choices and Private Interests in the Upper Milanese Area]. Bruno Mondadori Editore.

51.

Tozzi

(2023). L’invenzione di Milano. Culto della comunicazione e politiche urbane [The invention of Milan: The cult of communication and urban policies]. Cronopio.

52.

Van Aalst

Boogaarts

. (2002). From museum to mass entertainment: The evolution of the role of museums in cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967642002009003033

53.

Vivant

(2009). How underground culture is changing Paris. Urban Research and Practice, 2(1), 36–52.

54.

Vivant

(2010). The (re)making of Paris as a Bohemian Place? Progress in Planning, 74(3), 107–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2010.05.002

55.

While

(2003). Locating art worlds: London and the making of Young British art. Area, 35(3), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00174

56.

Zorloni

(2005). Structure of the contemporary art market and the profile of Italian Artists. International Journal of Arts Management, 8(1), 61–71.

57.

Zorloni

(2013). The economics of contemporary art. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32405-5

58.

Zukin

(1996). The cultures of cities. Wiley-Blackwell.

The Art of Taking Space: Interdependencies in the Contemporary Art Ecosystem in Milan,Italy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References