Autochthonous places are sui generis and unique. But unfortunately, they entice planners and politicians and become their target. This study investigates a more than 2,000 years old settlement, Fener-Balat (Istanbul), in terms of topos (its population movements and ethnic structure over the years, physical properties) and chora (feelings, emotions, and aura). It employs multiple research techniques that disclose findings on dimensional and typo-morphological qualities (connectivity, accessibility, legibility, walkability, figure/ground, and other identity properties such as district-edge-nodes-paths-landmarks), historical and cultural palimpsests, which altogether define the uniqueness of the place. The present study claims that the Fener-Balat district is defined as a strong “place” with its “topos,” and “chora,” despite the undesirable physical, social, and ethnic structure changes brought about by time. Thus, it proposes a soft method that includes renovation and restoration of problem buildings on site which is more suitable for the unique protected areas of world civilizations.
AhunbayZ.Dinçerİ.ŞahinÇ. (Eds.). (2016). Fener-Balat-Ayvansaray: Bir koruma mücadelesinin öyküsü [Fener-Balat-Ayvansaray: The story of a struggle for protection]. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
2.
AktarA. (2011). Varlık Vergisi Yeniden [Wealth Tax Rebuild]. In AktarA.İnselA. (Eds.), Yorgo Hacıdimitriadis‘in Aşkale-Erzurum Günlüğü (1943) [The Aşkale-Erzurum Diary of George Hadjidimitriadis (1943)]. İletişim Yayınları. (Original work published 1943)
AssmannJ. (2001). Kültürel bellek: Eski yüksek kültürlerde yazı, hatırlama ve Politik kimlik [Cultural memory: Writing, remembrance, and political identity in ancient high cultures] (TekinA., Trans.). Ayrıntı Yayınları. (Original work published 1992)
5.
CacheB. (1995). Earth moves: The furnishing of territories (SpeaksM., Ed., BoymanA., Trans.). MIT Press.
6.
CastelloL. (2010). Rethinking the meaning of place. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
7.
ÇokonaA. (2010). Fener, İstanbulum dizisi [Fener, Istanbulum-Series]. Heyamola.
8.
DoveyK. (1999). Framing places: Mediating power in built form. Routledge.
GürŞ. Ö. (2002a). Palimpsest: Örselenmiş Parşömen ya da Tablet-1 [Palimpsest: Crumpled Parchment or Tablet-1]. YAPI, 245, 60–65.
15.
GürŞ. Ö. (2002b). Palimpsest’i Okumak [Reading Palimpsest]. YAPI, 246, 64–74.
16.
GürŞ. Ö.ErdinçS. Y. (2018, June12–15). Buildings tell the truth: Fener-Balat as a case of vernacular amid Istanbul. [Paper presentation]. In AmoêdaR.LiraS.PinheiroC.Santiago ZaragozaJ. M.Calvo SerranoJ.García CarrilloF. (Eds.), HERITAGE 2018: The Conference 10th Anniversary edition. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on heritage and sustainable development (Vol. 1, pp. 797–804). Granada, Spain.
17.
GürŞ. Ö.EvcilN.ErkartalP. Ö. (Eds.). (2015). Fener-Balat Workshop-2015 / Fill in the Blanks. Beykent Publications.
18.
GürŞ. Ö.KuyumcuY. (Eds.). (2012). A Practice-based Research on Transformation: Galata Workshop-2011. Beykent Publications.
19.
HalbwachsM. (1992). On collective memory. University of Chicago Press.
20.
HeideggerM. (1993). Building, dwelling, thinking. In KrellD. F. (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 343–363). Harper San Francisco. (Original work published 1951)
21.
HillierB. (2015). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1996).
22.
HillierB.HansonJ. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press.
Hutabarat LoR. (2009). Walkability: What is it?Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903092867
25.
İpekN. (2016). Fetihten Cumhuriyet’e İstanbul’a yönelik göçler [Migrations to Istanbul from the Conquest to the Republic]. In EmecenF. M.YılmazC. (Eds.), Antik Çağdan 21. yüzyıla büyük İstanbul Ansiklopedisi [The great Istanbul Encyclopedia from Antiquity to the 21st century] (Vol. 3, pp. 520–530). Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür A.Ş. Yayınları.
26.
KandelE. R.SchwartzJ. H.JessellT. M.SiegelbaumS. A.HudspethA. J. (2012). Principles of neural science. McGraw-Hill.
27.
KarpatK. H. (2016). İstanbul Nüfusu: XVIII. yüzyıl sonundan XX. yüzyılının başına kadar [Population of Istanbul: From the end of the XVIII century to the beginning of the XX century]. In EmecenF. M.YılmazC. (Eds.), Antik Çağ’dan 21. yüzyıla büyük İstanbul ansiklopedisi [The great Istanbul encyclopedia from antiquity to the 21st century] (Vol. 3, pp. 488–519). Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür A.Ş. Yayınları.
KoçY. (2016). Bizans Dönemi’nde İstanbul nüfusu [Population of Istanbul in the Byzantine Period]. In EmecenF. M.YılmazC. (Eds.), Antik Çağdan 21. yüzyıla büyük İstanbul ansiklopedisi [The great Istanbul encyclopedia from antiquity to the 21st century] (Vol 3, pp. 458–466). Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür A.Ş. Yayınları.
30.
KrierR. (1979). Urban space. Academy Editions.
31.
LefebvreH. (1986). Le retour de la dialectique: 12 mots clefs pour le monde moderne [The return of dialectics: 12 key words for the modern world]. Messidor, Edition sociales [Social Editions].
32.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). Blackwell. (Originally published 1974)
33.
LukermannF. (1964). Geography as a formal intellectual discipline and the way in which it contributes to human knowledge. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 8(8), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1964.tb00605
34.
LynchK. (1960). The image of the city. The MIT Press.
35.
MakiF. (1964). Investigations in collective form. St. Louis, School of Architecture. Washington University Special Publications.
36.
MakiF. (2008) . City and modernism. MulliganM. (Ed.), Nurturing dreams. Collected essays on architecture and the city (pp. 82–90). The MIT Press.
37.
MazmanA. Ö. (2016). Cumhuriyet Sonrası İstanbul Demografisi / Post-Republic Istanbul Demography. In EmecenF. M.YılmazC. (Eds.), Antik Çağ’dan 21. yüzyıla büyük İstanbul ansiklopedisi, 3 [The great Istanbul Encyclopedia from Antiquity to the 21st century, 3] (pp. 532–543). Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür A.Ş. Yayınları.
38.
MeenG.AndrewM. (2007). Planning for housing in the post-Barker era: Affordability, household formation, and tenure choice. International Centre for Housing and Urban Economics, Department of Economics, 24/1, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn010
Norberg-SchulzC. (1971). Existence, space and architecture. Praeger Publishers.
43.
Norberg-SchulzC. (1979). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
44.
ÖzM. (2016). İstanbul Nüfusu: Fetihten XVIII. yüzyıl sonlarına kadar [Population of Istanbul: From the Conquest to the end of the XVIII century]. In EmecenF. M.YılmazC. (Eds.), Antik Çağ’dan 21. yüzyıla büyük İstanbul ansiklopedisi [The great Istanbul encyclopedia from antiquity to the 21st century] (Vol. 3, pp. 468–486). Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür A.Ş. Yayınları.
ÖzerA. (2022). Kamusal Mekânlarn Dizimsel, Biçimsel ve Alglanabilirlik Düzeyinin Değerlendirilmesine Yönelik Bir Yöntem Önerisi: Sultanahmet ve Galata Meydanları [A Method Proposal for Evaluating the Syntactic, Formal and Perceptibility Level of Public Spaces: Sultanahmet and Galata Squares]. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Wakif University. (Unpublished Dissertation)
47.
PerryC. A. (1929). The neighbourhood unit. Neighborhood and community planning of the regional survey of New York and its environs. Committee on Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.
48.
RattiC. (2004). Space syntax: Some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3019
49.
RelphE. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion Limited.
TafuriM. (1998). Towards a critique of architectural ideology. In HaysM. (Ed.), Architectural theory since 1968 (pp. 6–35). MIT Press.
54.
TrancikR. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. John Wiley and Sons.
55.
TuanY.-F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Prentice Hall.
56.
TuanY.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
57.
TuanY.-F. (1979). Space and place: Humanistic perspective. In GaleS.OlssonG. (Eds.), Philosophy in geography. Theory and decision library (An international series in the philosophy and methodology of the social and behavioral sciences) (Vol. 20, pp. 387–427). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5_19
58.
TunstallR. (2011). Social housing and social exclusion 2000–2011 (CASE, 153). Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.
