Listening Beyond the Human: The Autonomous Recording Unit and the Ethics of Sound in Biodiversity Conservation

Abstract

Sound technologies and sound sensor networks play a crucial role in our understanding of biodiversity loss in conservation biology and the environmental sciences. Among these technologies, the autonomous recording unit (ARU) has been widely used for studying longitudinal biodiversity loss. This article draws on fieldwork conducted in 2016 and 2017 at a bioacoustics research laboratory to explore the significance of the ARU, developed by Wildlife Acoustics, as the central component of the research network for biodiversity conservation. While it is commonly acknowledged in Science and Technology Studies (STS) that research instruments are not neutral data collectors, this article examines how the ARU is deployed and programmed, and how it transcends the limitations of human-centered listening by (a) shifting the focus away from the perceiving human subject and (b) promoting a global ethic of response and responsibility as sound becomes more democratized in scientific practices.

Keywords

bioacoustics environmental monitoring listening sound sense

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Back

(2007). The art of listening. Berg.

Ballestero

(2019). Touching with light, or, how texture recasts the sensing of underground water. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 762–785.

Bar-Shalom

Inzler

(2003). U.S. Patent No 6,535,131. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Bijsterveld

(2019). Sonic skills: Listening for knowledge in science, medicine and engineering (1920s—Present). Palgrave Macmillan.

Brandes

T. S.

(2008). Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation. Bird Conservation International, 18(S1), S163–S173.

Bruyninckx

(2018). Listening in the field: Recording and the science of birdsong. The MIT Press.

Darras

Furnas

Fitriawan

Mulyani

Tscharntke

(2018). Estimating bird detection distances in sound recordings for standardizing detection ranges and distance sampling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(9), 1928–1938.

Foden

W. B.

Young

B. E.

Akçakaya

H. R.

Garcia

R. A.

Hoffmann

A. A.

Stein

B. A.

Thomas

C. D.

Wheatley

C. J.

Bickford

Carr

J. A.

Hole

D. G.

Martin

T. G.

Pacifici

Pearce-Higgins

J. W.

Platts

P. J.

Visconti

Watson

J. E. M.

Huntley

(2019). Climate change vulnerability assessment of species. WIREs Climate Change, 10, e551. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.551

Forsey

M. G.

(2010). Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography, 11(4), 558–572.

10.

Gabrys

(2019). Sensors and sensing practices: Reworking experience across entities, environments, and technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 723–736.

11.

Gallagher

Kanngieser

Prior

(2017). Listening geographies: Landscape, affect and geotechnologies. Progress in Human Geography, 41(5), 618–637.

12.

Guilfoyle

(2015). Listening in narrative therapy: Double listening and empathic positioning. South African Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 36–49.

13.

Harris

(2016). Listening-touch, affect and the crafting of medical bodies through percussion. Body & Society, 22(1), 31–61.

14.

Helmreich

(2019). Reading a wave buoy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 737–761.

15.

Howe

(2019). Sensing asymmetries in other-than-human forms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 900–910.

16.

Ingold

(2017). Surface visions. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(7–8), 99–108.

17.

Ingold

(2018). Surface textures: The ground and the page. Philological Quarterly, 97(2), 137–154.

18.

Katakis

(1998). Excavating voices: Listening to photographs of native Americans. University of Pennsylvania Museum.

19.

Labelle

(2018). Sonic agency: Sound and emergent forms of resistance. Goldsmiths Press.

20.

Leppert

(1993). The sight of sound: Music, representation and the history of the body. University of California Press.

21.

Lostanlen

Salamon

Farnsworth

Kelling

Bello

J. P.

(2019). Robust sound event detection in bioacoustic sensor networks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1905.08352.

22.

Mundy

(2018). Animal musicalities: Birds, beasts, and evolutionary listening. Wesleyean University Press.

23.

Oliver

R. Y.

Ellis

D. P.

Chmura

H. E.

Krause

J. S.

Pérez

J. H.

Sweet

S. K.

Gough

Wingfield

J. C.

Boelman

N. T.

(2018). Eavesdropping on the Arctic: Automated bioacoustics reveal dynamics in songbird breeding phenology. Science Advances, 4(6), p.eaaq1084.

24.

Puig de la Bellacasa

. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

25.

Richardson

C. R

. & Otter Products LLC. (2003). Weather proof box. U.S. Patent Application 29/150,779.

26.

Shonfield

Bayne

(2017). Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: Current use and future applications. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 12(1), Article 14.

27.

Supper

(2015). Sound information: Sonification in the age of complex data and digital audio. Information & Culture, 50(4), 441–464.

28.

Supper

(2016). Lobbying for the ear, listening with the whole body: The (anti-) visual culture of sonification. Sound Studies, 2(1), 69–80.

29.

Taylor

C. E.

Huang

Yao

(2016). Distributed sensor swarms for monitoring bird behavior: An integrated system using wildlife acoustics recorders. Artificial Life and Robotics, 21(3), 268–273.

30.

Vallee

(2018). The science of listening in bioacoustics research: Sensing the animals’ sounds. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(2), 47–65.

31.

Watson

M. C.

(2014). Listening in the Pakal controversy: A matter of care in Ancient Maya studies. Social Studies of Science, 44(6), 930–954.

32.

Yip

D. A.

Knight

E. C.

Haave-Audet

Wilson

S. J.

Charchuk

Scott

C. D.

Sólymos

Bayne

E. M.

(2019). Sound level measurements from audio recordings provide objective distance estimates for distance sampling wildlife populations. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 6(3), 301–315.