Inspired by recent debates in material religion, and using the example of the central Indian city of Bhopal, this article characterizes an informal Hindu religious geography that flourishes in the interstices of India’s planned urbanity. The small wayside shrines that dot Indian cities usually arise spontaneously, created by believers who discern divine manifestations and begin to worship these. Traces of ritual activities animate others to follow suit and express their devotion, thus reinforcing the sites’ sacredness. The daily repetition of myriad minor ritual gestures maintains a dynamic religious geography, which in a recursive mode ties together devotees in an anonymous ritual community, whose members share a visual language and are inclined to take seriously the desire of deities to live among humans. With a focus on minor religion, and by concentrating on the social life of a cosmos of informal shrines, the text highlights a less-studied dimension of urban religion. It draws attention to the cumulative effect of lived practices and human–material entanglements, and complements discussions that frequently engage with omnipresent politics of formalization as well as competition of communities for attention and recognition in multireligious spaces.
AnjariaJ. S. (2016). The slow boil: Street food, rights, and public space in Mumbai. Stanford University Press.
2.
AppaduraiA. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
3.
BabbL. A. (1981). Glancing: Visual interaction in Hinduism. Journal of Anthropological Research, 37, 387–401.
4.
BallesteroA. (2019). A future history of water. Duke University Press.
5.
BecciI.BurchardtM.CasanovaJ. (Eds.). (2013). Topographies of faith: Religion in urban spaces. Brill.
6.
BharneV. (2013). Anointed cities: The incremental urbanism of Hindu India. In BharneV. (Ed.), The emerging Asian city: Concomitant urbanities and urbanisms (pp. 17–26). Routledge.
7.
BharneV.KruscheK. (2012). Rediscovering the Hindu temple: The sacred architecture of urbanism of India. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
8.
BjörkmanL. (2015). Pipe politics, contested waters: Embedded infrastructures of millennial Mumbai. Duke University Press.
9.
BräunleinP. J. (2016). Thinking religion through things: Reflections on the material turn in the scientific study of religion\s. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 28, 365–399.
10.
BurchardtM.WestendorpM. (2018). The im-materiality of urban religion: Towards an ethnography of urban religious aspirations. Culture and Religion, 19(2), 160–176.
11.
ChatterjeeP. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press.
12.
ComaroffJ. (2007). Ghostly topographies: Landscape and biopower in modern Singapore. Cultural Geographies, 14, 56–73.
13.
de LaetM.MolA. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263.
14.
DurkheimE. (1971). The elementary forms of the religious life. George Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1915)
15.
EckD. (1983). Banaras: City of light. Routledge.
16.
EckD. (1986). Darshan of the image. India International Center Quarterly, 13(1), 43–53.
17.
ElisonW. (2018). Site, sight, cite: Conceptualizing wayside shrines as visual culture. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 18, 1–28.
18.
FaríasI.BenderT. (Eds.). (2010). Urban assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory changes urban studies. Routledge.
19.
GaenszleM.GengnagelJ. (Eds.). (2006). Visualizing space in Banaras: Images, maps, and the practice of representation. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.
20.
GellA. (1998). Art and agency: Towards a new anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.
21.
Ghassem-FachandiP. (2012). The city threshold: Mushroom temples and magic remains in Ahmedabad. Ethnography, 13(1), 12–27.
22.
GoddardP. E. (1913). Wayside shrines in Northwestern California. American Anthropologist, New Series, 15(4), 702–703.
23.
GosdenC. (2005). What do objects want?Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12, 193–211.
24.
HabermanD. L. (2013). People trees: Worship of trees in northern India. Oxford University Press.
25.
HancockM.SrinivasS. (2018). Roundtable on spirited topographies. Religion and urban place-making: Ordinary cities and milieus of innovation. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 86(2), 454–472.
26.
HaskettC. (2018). On Varanasi’s tiny temples. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 18, 1–21.
27.
HengT. (2016). Making unofficial sacred space: Spirit mediums and house temples in Singapore. Geographical Review, 106(2), 215–234.
HennA. (2008). Crossroads of religions: Shrines, mobility and urban space in Goa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 658–670.
30.
HennA. (2014). Hindu-Catholic encounters in Goa: Religion, colonialism, and modernity. Indiana University Press.
31.
HolbraadM. (2007). The power of powder: Multiplicity and motion in the divinatory cosmology of Cuban Ifá (or mana, again). In HenareA.HolbraadM.WastellS. (Eds.), Thinking through things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically (pp. 189–225). Routledge.
32.
HolstonJ.AppaduraiA. (1996). Cities and citizenship. Public Culture, 8, 187–204.
33.
JohnsonA. A. (2014). Ghosts of the new city: Spirits, urbanity, and the ruins of progress in Chiang Mai. University of Hawai’i Press.
34.
KalpagamU. (2006). Secularism, religiosity and popular culture: Chennai’s roadside temples. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(43/44), 4595–4600.
35.
KendallL. (2016). Can commodities be sacred? Material religion in Seoul and Hanoi. In van der VeerP. (Ed.), Handbook of religion and the Asian city: Aspiration and urbanization in the twenty-first century (pp. 367–384). Routledge.
36.
KentE. F. (2018). Bus-stop Sami: Transient temples in urban South India. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 18, 1–22.
37.
KongL. (2005). Religious processions: Urban politics and poetics. Temenos, 41(2), 225–249.
38.
LariosB. (2018). From the heavens to the streets: Pune’s wayside shrines. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 18, 1–24.
39.
LariosB.VoixR. (2018). Introduction. Wayside shrines in India: An everyday defiant religiosity. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 18, 1–42.
40.
LatourB. (1999). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 15–25.
41.
LezaunJ. (2017). Actor-network theory. In BenzecryC.KrauseM.ReedI. (Eds.), Social theory now (pp. 305–336). Chicago University Press.
42.
LivezeyL. (2000). Public religion and urban transformation: Faith in the city. NYU Press.
43.
LowS. (Ed.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of anthropology and the city. Routledge.
44.
MaussM. (1954). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Cohen & West.
45.
McLainK. (2016). Visual and media culture. In HatcherB. (Ed.), Hinduism in the modern world (pp. 227–242). Routledge.
46.
MeyerB. (2011). Mediation and immediacy: Sensational forms, semiotic ideologies and the question of the medium. Social Anthropology, 19(1), 23–39.
47.
MongerG. (1997). Modern wayside shrines. Folklore, 108(1–2), 113–114.
48.
OrsiR. A. (1999). Gods of the city: Religion and the American urban landscape. Indiana University Press.
49.
OsterbergA. C. (2018). The role of roadside shrines in the everyday lives of female devotees in Mumbai. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 18, 1–20.
50.
OwensB. M. (1995). Human Agency and divine power: Transforming images and recreating gods among the Newar. History of Religions, 34(3), 201–240.
51.
PfaffenbergerB. (1992). Social anthropology of technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 491–516.
52.
PhadkeS.KhanS.RanadeS. (Eds.). (2011). Why Loiter? Women & risk on Mumbai streets. Penguin.
53.
PineF.Pine-CabralJ. (Eds.). (2008). On the margin of religion. Berghahn Books.
54.
RaoU. (2003). Negotiating the Divine. Temple Religion and Temple Politics in India. Manohar.
55.
RaoU. (2007). Partition in Contemporary Struggles over Religious Spaces in Bhopal. In JassalS. T.Ben-AriE. (Eds.), Memory and the Partition Motif in Contemporary Conflicts (pp. 297–320). Sage.
56.
RichardsonM. B. (2005). Reverence and resistance in Lithuanian wayside shrines. Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, 10, 249–267.
57.
SchnitzlerA. (2016). Democracy’s infrastructure: Techno-politics and protest after Apartheid. Princeton University Press.
58.
SekineY. (2006). Sacralization of the urban footpath, with special reference to pavement shrines in Chennai City, South India. Temenos, 42(2), 79–92.
59.
SrinivasS. (2016). Roadside shrines, storefront saints, and twenty-first century lifestyles: The cultural and spatial thresholds of Indian Urbanism. In WaghorneJ. P. (Ed.), Place/No-Place in urban Asian religiosity (pp. 131–147). Springer.
60.
ThomasN. (1996). Forward. In GellA. (Ed.), Art and agency: Towards a new anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.
61.
van der VeerP. (2013). Urban aspiration in Mumbai and Singapore. In BecciI.BurchardtM.CasanovaJ. (Eds.), Topographies of faith: Religion in urban space (pp. 61–71). Brill.
62.
van der VeerP. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of religion and the Asian City: Aspiration and urbanization in the twenty-first century. University of Chicago Press.
63.
WaghorneJ. P. (2004). Diaspora of the gods: Modern Hindu temples in an urban middle-class world. Oxford University Press.
64.
YoungA. (2014). Cities in the city: Street art, enchantment, and the urban commons. Law & Literature, 26(2), 145–161.
